Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

CptBarney

Players
  • Content Сount

    8,127
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    245

Everything posted by CptBarney

  1. CptBarney

    Poll: Unofficial Most Anticipated Ship by this Forum

    Eh jus gib her 3.5 sec reload camrade! But like the other AA cruisers she will probs be a minotaur on steroids but smoll caliber.
  2. CptBarney

    Poll: Unofficial Most Anticipated Ship by this Forum

    So shes a british smolensk?
  3. CptBarney

    What happened to Slava/Pobeda?

    I mean you would think dat, but still. So slava, borodino and poltava, we just need a tier 9 and 10 coal bb's and a tier 10 steel one too. den ultimate balans1
  4. CptBarney

    CV Rework Discussion

    Makes it sad too be honest. I used to be quite exitable at the idea of suggesting things, but now i feel like a husk when it comes to do so. I mainly play due to the peeps on here and because no other game like it exists. And gaijin isn't a great sub mainly due to the horrible grind and also questionable map choice as well. Oh well.
  5. CptBarney

    What happened to Slava/Pobeda?

    I thought it got put on hold for now? So not testing, tweaking of anykind? Plus not too mention the other 2 russian bb premiums as well (or is slava a silver ship?) And if it is then we have a tier 9 and 10 too look forward too (yay..)
  6. CptBarney

    Smolensk... what is it based on?

    152mm smolensk.... 152mm bigensk! Im curious were peeps get dem images from, pretty interested to see what other designs the russians have. Then i guess we can play whos dat ship?
  7. CptBarney

    Doubloon warning!!!

    Hmm...can anyone check if these containers take doubloons plus tokens? if so seems very questionable, a lootbox that takes and gives the same amount of loot? Wheres doctor who for dem paradoxies?
  8. CptBarney

    CV Rework Discussion

    It's your job, people expect you to do things and hold them to a standard. If i were to design mechanics as a game dev i would dam well make sure they were pretty decent from the get go, before launching. And if they didn't work properly or well i would explain why, my thoughts on any ways of fixing the problem and consolting the community for further help. Yes it is, because like you said they could of simply of made their jobs easier and saved RTS in general. Instead for a very strange reason they decided to completely change the formula (mostly) and gained major negative feedback because of hit and hit none of their goals at the sametime. Although you could argue that scrapping CV's altogether would of been easier, but would enraged a lot of people. They have a job just because don't want to do it doesnt mean they shouldn't. That sounds more like ignoring feedback, because your talking about the feedback in general the pros and cons and weighing up all the decisions and explaining to the user what works and doesn't how they could implement it etc. I've learn't by now that giving feedback is useless to this company in general as they never mention if they have taken it into consideration, nor do they point specific users and even showcase their posts and explain how they implemented directly from the post and/or took inspiration and created their own version. I understand your point. And i get most feedback is utter trash (if you can call it feedback), im also aware wargaming has mentioned and provided feedback to the feedback itself from some community suggestions, but this is becoming increasingly rare. On the forums most peeps want to see more historical ships, rather than fantasy ships (i don't mind either way, but i sympathise with them). Ships that would probs earn them a large sum of money compared to the invest into said modelling projects. Sad really, because i like the game and want to give feedback to their utilities. But they rarely check anything unless voiced in large and/or consistent numbers and voices. So makes me not want to bother. Even things like a basic demount all flags button which would litterally take a few hrs to code, are shelved for no actual good reason.
  9. CptBarney

    CV Rework Discussion

    So basically your saying that instead of listening to sound advice that would actually make you a better baker, you stick your fingers in your ears and scream 'I wOnT lIStEn!!' Sure most 'suggestions' are terrible, but when your top players and CC's give you advice on how to make a particular thing better and you ignore it to create an epic fail of an reeeeework? Yeah no, is it so hard to accept, sound advice from individuals who basically know more about how the game is played and are very passionate about said game? At this point this thread serves no other purpose, but to allow random peeps to vent, or just discuss random things at this point.
  10. CptBarney

    Poll: Unofficial Most Anticipated Ship by this Forum

    Lusty! And washingmachine again pls. Maybe some others but we will see, fantasy ships are the priority for wargaming atm.
  11. CptBarney

    Doubloon warning!!!

    When Mark 1 eyeballs are out of the meta. Buff when peegee?
  12. CptBarney

    CV Rework Discussion

    True, all the decent advice we gave them on how to fix RTS CV's and they well..just threw it back into our faces. Not our fault when you as the developer decide to for some strange reason ignore excellent and well thought out suggestions. I thought what wg did with fara was quite disgusting and unprofessional.
  13. CptBarney

    Smolensk.

    I legit almost had a heart attack when i saw panzerknackers vid with the kremlin in it having a radar luckily i read it again shortly afterwards and saw minotaur next to radar lol. I wouldn't mind a tier 9 version of the thunderer doe. Champion? Indescriable? Cavalier? Wun sum chipz frum dah chippeh luv? (lmao)
  14. CptBarney

    Italian cruisers are intentionally that bad?

    Lol, i wouldn't be surprised too be honest. But seeing them with SAP wouldn't suprise me and i hope they don't SAP seems pretty situational atm. Never understood why roma has such bad dispersion though.
  15. CptBarney

    Italian cruisers are intentionally that bad?

    Borodino seems like a far more armoured ricchy, poltava is in a werid spot but even so seems to play somewhat fine regardless, but if wargaming wants her to play like the others she will probs need an armour buff or something. We will see anyways wargaming have put slava on the shelves for now. makes me wonder how good the italian bb’s will be.
  16. CptBarney

    Italian cruisers are intentionally that bad?

    Well you got bornonino and miss poltava that will hit the servers soon (maybe). not too mention the coal tier 9 and 10 prems that will inevitably appear and any steel prems too.
  17. CptBarney

    Smolensk.

    Now we need bigmensk to seal the deal. 16 305’s with 5.5 sec reload anyone?
  18. CptBarney

    Royal Navy is being discriminated against by WG

    I actually dont mind since looking at world of tanks not many of british stuff there is all too (yes i know about cromwell and super conq but thats besides the point). too be honest most if not all the nations could do with better representation but because wargaming only does a brach rotation rather than a tree you only get smaller segments of the tree added at a time (which make sense too be honest). i just wish the bb line wasnt a bunch of HE slingers (wtf was wargaming smoking when they thought that would be a good unique trait). oh well once ultimate admiral kicks off i doubt ill much of this game which is sad doe. i still like all the toinehs on the forum however. (yes im british as well).
  19. CptBarney

    Any hope for Enterprise?

    After watching the first episode of azur lane, i imagined thats how you normally play enty lol.
  20. CptBarney

    Noob actions

    I don't think i've ever seen a CC from the EU side come on here actually, probs more active on the NA server, although would be nice to chat too them i guess. I haven't played against a CC but i did play with flambass twice, in miss lexi (didn't say anything but neither did i lol). Probs played against one but never noticed knowing me lol.
  21. CptBarney

    Any hope for Enterprise?

    Kaga out of the remaining three requires the least amount of skill, due to decent regen rates and large plane reserves. Not too mention she has insane torp bombers and HE bombers which helps with DOT. Saipan requires quite a bit of knowledge to do well with, but still decent, GZ is ok her torp bombers are gud but the dive bombers are pretty tricky to handle for most.
  22. CptBarney

    Noob actions

    When people decide to throw a 900 point game with all 3 caps secured because sniffing each others farts is more important. That and the god awful players that feature in panzerknackers replays consistently.
  23. Your a bad player who has no clue on how to play at higher tiers. Essentially you are one of the reasons as to why you lose on a consistent basis. Go on youtube learn how to play the ships through guides or watch vids on how better players play their ships and this will give you a decent idea on how to play. atm you just suicide into the enemy at the start of most matches expecting your team to suicide into a crossfire (which makes no sense) and yes while the zao has great concealment you're surpossed to kite and learn to 'fire and vanish' (so fire once wait for you to drop into concealment wait a bit then fire while alos dodging when nessecary and making sure to stay in concealment to choose a decent route out of harms way, repeat etc.) that doesn't mean to border hump, you just need to know when to push, when to hold, when to support, where to go etc. Also rushing up the tiers is never a good thing.
  24. CptBarney

    Any hope for Enterprise?

    Just call it el2azer and stick at tier 10 with tier 12 jets. Heat seeking missles with 75mm's pen 8k damage. Monopropellant 750mm torpedoes with inbuilt sonar and counter measures 10k per damage and 60% floodings. sell it for £80's. balans for teh kiddies.
  25. CptBarney

    what is happening to this game lately?

    Probs a new feature they are testing to hide any new and upcoming balans ships
×