Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

CptBarney

Players
  • Content Сount

    8,127
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    245

Everything posted by CptBarney

  1. CptBarney

    CV's shouldnt be in the game, by a CV player

    Think hes already here xD Oh well. I just want miss boooogue bak. And yorkie pls (USS yorktown)
  2. CptBarney

    CV's shouldnt be in the game, by a CV player

    Wait untill monday, when excavatus, allied or miss minia will burn the thread to oblivion. @El2aZeR @1MajorKoenig I suggest you two carry on your convo in the cv thread when this occurs tommorrow. @Sunleader Maybe you as well if ya want to.
  3. CptBarney

    Crazy ping ratios

    you should beat up their ISP m8.
  4. CptBarney

    CV's shouldnt be in the game, by a CV player

    Very much this. CV's work on a different plane of reality compared to the rest of the classes. Basically Dr.Manhatten vs the watchmen. Not as extreme but sets a good mental image.
  5. CptBarney

    Hull classification clarification

    I've heard that CV is actually a french designation taken by the yanks. Not sure why they didn't just use AC or why cruiser (or any other ship type) appears before the weight/role type.
  6. CptBarney

    Is your CARRIER like these.

    I dun get it. halp.
  7. CptBarney

    CV's shouldnt be in the game, by a CV player

    Im not sure why wargaming removed CV counterplay (as in your cv being able to kill theirs with no loss of performance or minimal at least) or made AA the way it was so you have no effective counter, just something that acts as a deterent depending on the ship, cv and players in question. Even though CV's had big alpha strikes compared to now, they at least had a finite amount of planes that could run out during the match, which meant a cv couldn't just suicide his planes and still have 1-3 left for a single strike regardless. Also the lack of options to pick what we want to strike with also makes no sense. Plus the stupid amount of automation as well. While the number of battles isnt the same lexi in its current for has better, winrate, exp earned and damage plus frags compared to the rts version (not massively better but still considerably noticeable). Whether this will go down or not after 2mil battles will remain to be seen.
  8. CptBarney

    CV's shouldnt be in the game, by a CV player

    For more team orientated peeps like myself its more of a step backwards. I haven't, i havent forgotten getting deleted in my KGV against GZ AP bombers. CV spotting power is still there regardless, not as multitasking as RTS but its still there regardless. If you can barely land strikes and lose most of your planes during said strike over and over, with little damage done then yeah your pretty much being shut down or at least being denied. I haven't seen any metrics on global flak damage and kills either. Either they don't exist, wargaming hasn't linked to them API yet or websites havent added them in yet. I guess you can use plane kills but that factors in DPS as well. Everyone here including you has a personal opinion on how CV's should be, some want RTS again and to be fixed and improved. Some want to keep the current iteration, others want to change the iteration or buff and nerf stuff. And some want outright removal regardless. Eitherway wargaming won't change what they have now, but at the same time they won't even add in new lines or fill in tiers 5,7 and 9. I prefer RTS in my opinion its closer to realism and while frustrating did provide a challenge (i didn't notice many bugs but then i had a small play pool) in which i wish i spent longer playing them too be honest.
  9. CptBarney

    Is the Genova bad ?

    @Elypse201 Do you have miss granola? Is pasta shipfu bad?
  10. CptBarney

    CV Rework Discussion

    is she that bad or did top tier turn into a half chopped tomatoe?
  11. CptBarney

    CV's shouldnt be in the game, by a CV player

    Dis. Do you notice something important about this ship inparticular?
  12. CptBarney

    Greek Ships

    Eh i would just sort the branches out with consistency and fill the gaps in with relevant designs that suit the overall tree. It wouldn't be hard too be honest since you can actually have a somewhat if not completely linear tree/line. I mean i don't mind fantasy ships as long as they are not totally broken and fudge up balans. But still i was talking moar about what you would actually put into the tree that isnt realistic to fill gaps and make it more consistent. Ehh, but again im not talking about realistic ships since its kinda obvious they would have sod all, so was just thinking the type of cruisers from tier 2 to 10 and what gun calibers, speed, AA, HP and armour schemes they would have. Also gimmicks would imply that the thing being shoehorned with it is useless or just for show (what the word gimmick actually means). Either way wargaming can fill the gaps in they just don't need to be bonkers. I don't mind unique modules because they give the ship something useful, instead of relying on raw stats they rely more on precision and long term thinking, hense why ships with unusual modules aren't gimmicks but just there so you can play the ship in different way to the rest and give them their own flavour. Georgia would actually be pretty boring without her speed boost and heal too be honest, plus decent secondaries its why i've played her more than any other BB so far. Because of that werid play style. But yeah both trees would be bare as hell, but im willing to just make up stuff if it fills it up. *gibs butterfly some butter* 'W'
  13. CptBarney

    Greek Ships

    Oh well, guess we can shove two 420mm BB's at tier 9 and 10. Obviously designed by meh for maximum balans! Even if they are design ships, what stats and attributes plus names would you give the tier 9 and 10 ships in that line? Pan-asia will be interesting.
  14. CptBarney

    Warhammer 40k Collaboration ?

    Dystopian wars would oddly enough fit (only the more gun centric ships) in with this game (sort of). At least the general theme of it. I really like the chinese battleship doe. halp.
  15. CptBarney

    CV Rework Discussion

    1) Red = DD 2) Blue = Cruisers. 3) Orange = BB's. Yes. I wan! Do i get meh biscuit now? Oh is it required brainpower to play dem ships? nevermind. 1) Red = BB 2) Blue and Red = BB 3) CV's!
  16. CptBarney

    why german BBs should be the worst BB line in game?

    Guess slava needs buff no? Thank you camrade! da! *hic*
  17. CptBarney

    Greek Ships

    Dun worreh comrade, we can balans tree with *hic* new ships! da! But wow what a thread lol, i wouldn't mind seeing greeeks put into the Euro tree and even a smoll BB line (even if it is made up).
  18. CptBarney

    CV's shouldnt be in the game, by a CV player

    I hope they actually don't, cus i want some of the famous CV's to finally make there way in (or bak)
  19. CptBarney

    Offtopical Disco

    @Yoshanai Damm that song is actually pretty catchy. I mean i have dis, but still lol.
  20. CptBarney

    SHIPS XP MUST BE FREE

    But muh feefees! Btw, i never spent a dime on dis game and have 4 prem ships (gg boiz) soon to have one of the tier tens (probs gonna be thunderer at this rate). Kinda ironic about a guy who use the why heff to be mad meme, when hes mad salty about not being able to convert free exp for free. K fam. My reaction to this thread:
  21. CptBarney

    CV Rework Discussion

  22. CptBarney

    CV Rework Discussion

    Does anyone still get camera glitches and planes having a fit, while playing CV's? jus wonderin' 'w'
  23. CptBarney

    Warhammer 40k Collaboration ?

    Well i hope bloody lunar class cruisers, mars class battlecruisers and Armageddon class battleships dont suddenly start appearing. Especially since they would be massive as well. if its a new game entirely den noice. Russian tier 22 super battleship premium when?
×