CptBarney

I completely forgot about that. Been 3ish days without internetz so been out of the loop. Is FDR under those rules as well?

*teleports behind yoshi* *puts clorophorme hankie over yoshanais mouth who now looks like nagato* *loud muffled screaming* I think weegee missed an opportunity, for memes with 4 cv's per match or even funnier teleporting cvs to either side of the map next to the enemy team, at least your dpm would go up Has there been any word on the german cv's yet?

halp.

Game will switch between both in the most inappropiate moments. or just yeet the bombs into another game as you see their models fling outside the map. I wonder which nation is next after germany for cv's now?

Would be nice if the webdev learnt some basic HCI and web design so its actually brought up to standard.

*sits on top of elypses head*. ahh ok ill put mince in the yard den.

Better save it for the italian cv branch itself, noticed many on redditings that the italian BB line should of arrived at least around now or before the german cv line. Probs would get SAP rockets lol, in weegee infinite wisdom.

Didn't know about the above, also where do you find this stuff? I actually like looking at unusual ship designs for fun so wouldn't mind seeing them. It wouldn't surprise me if they did it purely for monetization, too be honest it would be nice too see some more tier 4, 5 and 6 prems. Maybe even a few more tier 2 pre-dread prems as well. Never knew about kron having 380mms as a proposal. Do you know if stalingrad was ever proposed for bigger or even smaller guns in general?

Sorry to disregard the rest, but that basically summed up my post (probs should of made that more clear). I actually have no clue what else they could i guess design wise nevermind, blueprint, prototype or historic they could add for the russians. If i remember correctly slava was surpossed to be a silver ship so we could see a more slava like line (i hope it won't be mental) as the second line. Otherwise they will probs do what you mentioned.

Open question to all. How would you design AA and CVs if you were given total control over the development process? And yes i get some hate CV's but im more interested in how some peeps would balance things or what mechanics they would come up with. Plus besides the new german cv's there is sod all else to discuss about.

Heard pvp is buggered though, after a certain point (i stopped around the time you get autocannons due to irl stuff and forgot about the game entirely). AW is fecked hasn't recovered at all since 2015 and even lost more pop after sometime and they had to merge the servers. And naval action suffered the same thing, but i heard the PVE campaigns in AW are very good (although buggy at times). Not sure about Naval action. Oh well.

Well their, heavy and light cruiser not BC's otherwise their gun caliber would be above 350mm's+ (thank god they aren't as well). i know what you mean but i think thats the problem is that weegee is running out of (sensible) ideas for new gameplay for new ships so they either end up dupilcating some parts while changing others. The thing is new ships don't bring new variety just slightly new ways of playing existing actual content like game modes, operations, campaigns etc. So we need more of those rather than more ships, and too be honest i don't mind similar ships having different stat changes as long as its not bonkers. Speaking of the russian tree we could end up seeing an extra one or two BB lines, light and heavy cruisers plus a super and battlecruiser line as well (and cvs). Even if they are paper most of the recent sihps prove weegee actually has shifted their stance on historical accuracy considerably and are just adding ships for the sake of it (not that i mind theres certain ships i want too see in general). i know what you mean though, we need more variety of game modes more thna ships since we will run out of ship based stuff faster, new modes allows vastly new ways of playing with existing mediums (ships in this case). although with more variety the harder it becomes to balance something due to too many variables and objects interacting with each other in general. oh well, im gonna see what alpha 6 brings for UA:D.

@NothingButTheRain Too be honest, theres only soo many ways you can make things unique before you just get ships that become a combination of extremes or mildness from those extremes and forge middle grounds that make them slightly less boring. I mean with the USN CV line split you could have Low alpha, high regen, good speed, low hp planes. Or have High alpha, low regen, very good-avg speed, Moderate-High hp planes. Or High concealment, Avg alpha, High mobility, avg speed, avg hp, below avg regen rates. Or Low conealment, Good alpha, Good mobility, avg speed, high hp, avg regen rates. Theres lots of examples you can do plus also removing or even adding a new plane type (so maybe different types of torp bombers or new types of planes like a bouncing bombers or something). Eventually even things like stalingrad might even become 'avg' and have to contest against ships that are just far better, since once you start running out of things to add (ship wise anyways). Oh well.

Makes me wonder why they havent added in the other cv's for the US and IJN line? Yes i know that CV's are broken mechanically, but weegee won't put them down (ever) hense why them going for the germans first before ships they have modelled, animated and even already with stats ready to be changed as needed along with most of those sihps being real wartime ships (YORKIE!) makes it odd.

I wonder how many people will jump to UA:D once they add modern CL's, DD's, Ships between 1860-1900 (they have monitor and the other first non mast ironclad), have the campaign up and various other things. I have to admit even i enjoy co-op more than i thought i would since, playing more games in it. I prefer PVP, but even im getting sick and tired of PVP in-general and would rather play PVE. Maybe they should shift their focus at least then weegee and can go mental with balans.

The skill system is far too limited and non-customizable to even take some or even a few features of a ship and make them somewhat better or mostly better. Or just something interesting in general. Eitherway i don't bother deviating because i see no point in general. It would be nice if each ship had far more perma camos or even different hull types to experiment with different loadouts (they would have to be at least somewhat viable). But then that would all ruin balance i guess.

Id rather yashima (sod the new name) kept her alpha otherwise i dont see why we have the 510's in the first place. Interesting to see the changes on the new russian cruisers, and lol agir gets nerfed because flalu had too much funz. @JaaZZEe negrep moar.

Probs saw the reddit post about ap rockits lol.

Um yes since they arent prems in anyway shape or form. Guess reading is hard.

Well i wonder how mince will face up against ap rockets in the near future? SHall be an interesting prospect me thinks.

The cvs are tech tree ships fam.

there were at least 5 proposed if not more designs for german cv's think a nurnberg conversion was one of them but i can't rememeber exactly of the top of my head.

Tier VIII Soviet battleship V. I. Lenin, based upon the battleship Lenin, was added to the game. The new ship will be used for partner collaborations. Also what does that mean btw? Looking at these CV's they seem very, very AP focused, i think they will have similar AP bombs to graf but im not entirely sure too be honest. I call dibs on AP rockets being the foretay of this line. Oh and i just remembered we won't get stats untill 1-2weeks before release? and z-35 on the day its released?

Quick type ten essays nowah! Also what do you think of them anyways? Wasnt expecting the names too be honest.

@Yoshanai @Sunleader had to do two posts cus this bloody website was being an arse when i kept refreshing.