Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

Karasu_Browarszky

Players
  • Content Сount

    13,025
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

  • Clan

    [I-J-N]

Everything posted by Karasu_Browarszky

  1. Karasu_Browarszky

    Subtitles?

    Ach, Gerrman. Ze true language of love.
  2. Karasu_Browarszky

    Subtitles?

    Nothing's wrong with that but.. that is what the subtitles would help to do, IMO. And... I googled i found a little something which would be nice to see in game as 'subtitles' although we now do see the translations (for Function key commands, I mean). I'd politely like to see it both ways in game! https://www.reddit.com/r/WorldOfWarships/comments/5r0am4/question_for_japanese_speakers/?depth=2
  3. Karasu_Browarszky

    Subtitles?

    While we are at it, WG could also add some sarcastic commentary from our captains like 'Bloody hell, I can't believe you missed.'
  4. Karasu_Browarszky

    300 ship poll (I want 600 said R Reagan)

    Likewise, can't vote as I can't answer the second question.
  5. Karasu_Browarszky

    Prank survey?

    Is WG trolling just me or is anyone else getting that 'prank survey'? I participated in the survey but all I got was a completely blank window.... in case I was the only one who got a blank one, what was it about?
  6. There was a real USS Georgia but... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Georgia_(BB-15) ... it ain't what we got in WoWS. While I understand the need to introduce new premium ships, WoWS U$$ Georgia sets a pretty bad precedent. Again, when there are real ships to choose from.. why?
  7. Karasu_Browarszky

    Dispersion Module is pathetic....

    Interestingly, this actually means that a tier 8/9 ship when equipped with the full set up gets a huge advantage over tier 6/7 ships when they are top tier. Tier X, on the other hand, will probably mostly be fighting ships that have the full camo and CE module buffs.
  8. Karasu_Browarszky

    Dispersion Module is pathetic....

    That's the one reason why I give a huge preference to the CE module on all my T8 and above ships. But.. wouldn't it be even worse without the dispersion module?
  9. The absolute thing to avoid is making the paper/fantasy/fake ships better than their equivalent real life ships. Apart from that, does every nation's navy, and every nation's tech line necessarily have to reach tier X? WG is limiting their own development by creating a matrix that is too rigid and inflexible. By at least making it about 50-50 they could introduce more tech lines offering variation in gameplay (like the battlecruisers) and smaller navies, even if those would not be complete and go all the way up to tier X.
  10. Still, as has been pointed out, there are a lot of real ships that are nowhere to be seen, even some Russian ships.
  11. That is a plus. I wonder how the Russian doctrine of always attacking the strongest enemy ship first got reflected in the design.
  12. That's pretty much how I see it too. Mentally much easier to accept an odd 'paper tank' or two than an entire fleet of phantom ships. The biggest problems in WoT IMO are not so much related to 'prototype' or 'blueprint' tanks as such, but the fact that some of the tanks there are just too unrealistic to ever have been built. Also many of their blueprint tanks represent failed designs. For gameplay purpose this can, of course, be adjusted. This is somewhat trivial because a lot of the problems for gameplay are tied to the MM. You just end up being bottom tier too often for it to be much fun. The two tier gap in WoT is also much bigger than the relative gap is in WoWS, thankfully. (By 'thankfully' I mean the gap isn't as big in WoWS, it is way too big in WoT, IMO).
  13. Isn't the Zao though supposedly based on the Design B-65 cruiser? Arguably she is (for me) the only really somewhat playable Japanese high tier cruiser so I am not exactly sorry that they included her in game. But agree with you in principle, especially with tiers where they could have selected ships that really did exist. There seems to be little point in adding paper ships in their place.
  14. Karasu_Browarszky

    Joystick gameplay idea

    For anything that requires flying and even driving I'd take a joystick over any other option but... not sure how it would work in this game because most sticks I have used (an older Wingman is what I currently have) tend to be.. well.. imprecise. What I would mostly want is actually having the ability to lock on target in the sense that I could have a look around and my guns would keep tracking the target.
  15. Or maybe it was meant as a catwalk. Italians are big on fashion things.
  16. Don't push too early. Don't get caught in crossfire. Keep your distance to the DD's as your secondaries are bit of a joke. For me the Vlad seems to work best when doing flanking maneuvers. It's as if the ship is somewhat similar to the George V.
  17. The reload time is bad, she also catches the fire all the frigging time.... But as long as you don't try to challenge tier X's, don't yolo, pack up enough repair parties etc (superintendent!) and position yourself wisely, you can do really well in the Vlad. PS I got the special camo for her too!
  18. I personally, am looking forward to the Swiss, Andorran, Monaco and Vatican navies.
  19. Karasu_Browarszky

    Soviet Battleships, another WG fail !?

    For Pete's sake (and Sean's)! Thanks for those videos. I think I've only had one battle in 'Pete' even though I had a good initial expression. Just too busy wrecking high tier battles I guess... I don't remember if we won or what map it was. All the maps feel the same to me, there is one good map and then a whole lot of maps with islands. Islands, islands everywhere. And I always hit one. Or two. Anyway, in my battle I started out firing at extreme ranges (because I prefer to fight at range) and.. either I push, start camping or start running for the hills. In this case I ran. I liked how the ship performed though, and I got to appreciate the gunnery, too. When you said that the optimal angle seems to be when you can bring all your guns to bear on your target that maybe the explanation why I liked her more than some. That is actually my prefer angle with all capital ships and larger cruisers.
  20. How many of them are complete fantasy (fakes)? Some are based on actual but never-to-be-realized projects, if I have understood correctly. Some are later period refits, some are ships that were laid out but never completed.
  21. Karasu_Browarszky

    Super container!

    For me the rare SC's I get seem to come in threes very close to each other. Then nothing for months... Suspicious, very suspicious....
  22. Perhaps it is best to call the second one a close tie so as not to offend anyone.
  23. Karasu_Browarszky

    Super container!

    My old pajamas!
  24. Karasu_Browarszky

    HMS Hood available on the 19th May

    There is an in game consumable camo 'For Meritorious Service' which would be THE camo to get for the Hood and many other ships. If WG were to make that available as a premium/permanent camo I'd be buying that one.
×