-
Content Сount
13,025 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
-
Clan
[I-J-N]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by Karasu_Browarszky
-
Ach, Gerrman. Ze true language of love.
-
Nothing's wrong with that but.. that is what the subtitles would help to do, IMO. And... I googled i found a little something which would be nice to see in game as 'subtitles' although we now do see the translations (for Function key commands, I mean). I'd politely like to see it both ways in game! https://www.reddit.com/r/WorldOfWarships/comments/5r0am4/question_for_japanese_speakers/?depth=2
-
While we are at it, WG could also add some sarcastic commentary from our captains like 'Bloody hell, I can't believe you missed.'
-
0.8.4 PSA: another code for a day of premium
Karasu_Browarszky replied to Norris_of_Quirm's topic in General Discussion
The code activated for me, but as stated previously, it is a WoT code.- 9 replies
-
- waiting for authorization unable to log_in
- disconnection before and after the match
-
(and 35 more)
Tagged with:
- waiting for authorization unable to log_in
- disconnection before and after the match
- unable to be serviced after the match...
- clan battles
- 0.9.9
- hellas
- greek
- liberty
- space battle
- sound
- camouflage
- cc
- clanwar
- tier x
- 0.6.2
- 0.6.2
- 0.6.2
- Support please
- machinima
- dramatic
- desperate
- jingles
- tirpitz
- cambletown
- overmatch
- survivability
- arpeggio
- WoWs
- Tyucan
- tier VIII
- IX
- Multi-Ts.pl
- DD
- un peu trop puissante
- Epic battles
- gameplay
- series
-
300 ship poll (I want 600 said R Reagan)
Karasu_Browarszky replied to pzkpfwv1d's topic in General Discussion
Likewise, can't vote as I can't answer the second question.- 14 replies
-
- silver ships
- premium ships
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Is WG trolling just me or is anyone else getting that 'prank survey'? I participated in the survey but all I got was a completely blank window.... in case I was the only one who got a blank one, what was it about?
-
WG, don't do the same mistake in WoWs as you did in World Of Fantasy Tanks
Karasu_Browarszky replied to HussarKaz's topic in General Discussion
There was a real USS Georgia but... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Georgia_(BB-15) ... it ain't what we got in WoWS. While I understand the need to introduce new premium ships, WoWS U$$ Georgia sets a pretty bad precedent. Again, when there are real ships to choose from.. why? -
Dispersion Module is pathetic....
Karasu_Browarszky replied to ___V_E_N_O_M___'s topic in General Discussion
Interestingly, this actually means that a tier 8/9 ship when equipped with the full set up gets a huge advantage over tier 6/7 ships when they are top tier. Tier X, on the other hand, will probably mostly be fighting ships that have the full camo and CE module buffs. -
Dispersion Module is pathetic....
Karasu_Browarszky replied to ___V_E_N_O_M___'s topic in General Discussion
That's the one reason why I give a huge preference to the CE module on all my T8 and above ships. But.. wouldn't it be even worse without the dispersion module? -
WG, don't do the same mistake in WoWs as you did in World Of Fantasy Tanks
Karasu_Browarszky replied to HussarKaz's topic in General Discussion
The absolute thing to avoid is making the paper/fantasy/fake ships better than their equivalent real life ships. Apart from that, does every nation's navy, and every nation's tech line necessarily have to reach tier X? WG is limiting their own development by creating a matrix that is too rigid and inflexible. By at least making it about 50-50 they could introduce more tech lines offering variation in gameplay (like the battlecruisers) and smaller navies, even if those would not be complete and go all the way up to tier X. -
WG, don't do the same mistake in WoWs as you did in World Of Fantasy Tanks
Karasu_Browarszky replied to HussarKaz's topic in General Discussion
Still, as has been pointed out, there are a lot of real ships that are nowhere to be seen, even some Russian ships. -
WG, don't do the same mistake in WoWs as you did in World Of Fantasy Tanks
Karasu_Browarszky replied to HussarKaz's topic in General Discussion
That is a plus. I wonder how the Russian doctrine of always attacking the strongest enemy ship first got reflected in the design. -
WG, don't do the same mistake in WoWs as you did in World Of Fantasy Tanks
Karasu_Browarszky replied to HussarKaz's topic in General Discussion
That's pretty much how I see it too. Mentally much easier to accept an odd 'paper tank' or two than an entire fleet of phantom ships. The biggest problems in WoT IMO are not so much related to 'prototype' or 'blueprint' tanks as such, but the fact that some of the tanks there are just too unrealistic to ever have been built. Also many of their blueprint tanks represent failed designs. For gameplay purpose this can, of course, be adjusted. This is somewhat trivial because a lot of the problems for gameplay are tied to the MM. You just end up being bottom tier too often for it to be much fun. The two tier gap in WoT is also much bigger than the relative gap is in WoWS, thankfully. (By 'thankfully' I mean the gap isn't as big in WoWS, it is way too big in WoT, IMO). -
WG, don't do the same mistake in WoWs as you did in World Of Fantasy Tanks
Karasu_Browarszky replied to HussarKaz's topic in General Discussion
Isn't the Zao though supposedly based on the Design B-65 cruiser? Arguably she is (for me) the only really somewhat playable Japanese high tier cruiser so I am not exactly sorry that they included her in game. But agree with you in principle, especially with tiers where they could have selected ships that really did exist. There seems to be little point in adding paper ships in their place. -
For anything that requires flying and even driving I'd take a joystick over any other option but... not sure how it would work in this game because most sticks I have used (an older Wingman is what I currently have) tend to be.. well.. imprecise. What I would mostly want is actually having the ability to lock on target in the sense that I could have a look around and my guns would keep tracking the target.
-
Russian battleship line's meaning and future possibilities.
Karasu_Browarszky replied to Markhand's topic in General Discussion
Or maybe it was meant as a catwalk. Italians are big on fashion things. -
Russian battleship line's meaning and future possibilities.
Karasu_Browarszky replied to Markhand's topic in General Discussion
Don't push too early. Don't get caught in crossfire. Keep your distance to the DD's as your secondaries are bit of a joke. For me the Vlad seems to work best when doing flanking maneuvers. It's as if the ship is somewhat similar to the George V. -
Russian battleship line's meaning and future possibilities.
Karasu_Browarszky replied to Markhand's topic in General Discussion
The reload time is bad, she also catches the fire all the frigging time.... But as long as you don't try to challenge tier X's, don't yolo, pack up enough repair parties etc (superintendent!) and position yourself wisely, you can do really well in the Vlad. PS I got the special camo for her too! -
Russian battleship line's meaning and future possibilities.
Karasu_Browarszky replied to Markhand's topic in General Discussion
I personally, am looking forward to the Swiss, Andorran, Monaco and Vatican navies. -
Soviet Battleships, another WG fail !?
Karasu_Browarszky replied to HardLens's topic in General Discussion
For Pete's sake (and Sean's)! Thanks for those videos. I think I've only had one battle in 'Pete' even though I had a good initial expression. Just too busy wrecking high tier battles I guess... I don't remember if we won or what map it was. All the maps feel the same to me, there is one good map and then a whole lot of maps with islands. Islands, islands everywhere. And I always hit one. Or two. Anyway, in my battle I started out firing at extreme ranges (because I prefer to fight at range) and.. either I push, start camping or start running for the hills. In this case I ran. I liked how the ship performed though, and I got to appreciate the gunnery, too. When you said that the optimal angle seems to be when you can bring all your guns to bear on your target that maybe the explanation why I liked her more than some. That is actually my prefer angle with all capital ships and larger cruisers.- 145 replies
-
- soviet battleships
- wargaming fails
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Soviet Battleships: The History and Features of the In-Game Ship Models
Karasu_Browarszky replied to The_EURL_Guy's topic in News & Announcements
How many of them are complete fantasy (fakes)? Some are based on actual but never-to-be-realized projects, if I have understood correctly. Some are later period refits, some are ships that were laid out but never completed. -
For me the rare SC's I get seem to come in threes very close to each other. Then nothing for months... Suspicious, very suspicious....
-
Soviet Battleships: The History and Features of the In-Game Ship Models
Karasu_Browarszky replied to The_EURL_Guy's topic in News & Announcements
Perhaps it is best to call the second one a close tie so as not to offend anyone. -
My old pajamas!
-
HMS Hood available on the 19th May
Karasu_Browarszky replied to anonym_u5USg8CcK96I's topic in General Discussion
There is an in game consumable camo 'For Meritorious Service' which would be THE camo to get for the Hood and many other ships. If WG were to make that available as a premium/permanent camo I'd be buying that one.
