Karasu_Browarszky

I could swear there is also damage when the shells don't seem to hit or penetrate at least. But Mum says I have to stop swearing...

@EnduringSilence is in battle against our team right now!

I liked the Crescent Hawks Revenge myself. Not an MMOG though...

You're right on that. It only takes 1 single ship that your team allows to 'slip' through to throw a game. Then it won't matter much how well you've played till that point.

There is a little too much emphasis on capping. A failed capping attempt is costly. The purpose is to win, which usually means you have to sink at least enough of the enemy ships. The viable strategy is to take at least one cap early, or deny all caps to the enemy while targeting their lead ships and/or DD's.

True, under very special circumstances like equal points with base capture, never seen that happen though in reality, too many variables. I think in the Benham event, it was possible to get draw and seen it happen then myself. EDIT Have had 18 draws myself. Extremely rare these days.

Win or don't, there is no draw.

The aim thing keeps me puzzled. I think yesterday I was repeatedly overpenning an enemy Yamato. The advice from team.. don't aim at the superstructure... I wasn't actually aiming at the superstructure (impossible actually...) but right at the target as much as I could. I hit the Yamato, so my aim was not off. If I had adjusted my aim, I would have missed completely.

I'm slightly tired of playing this game too as there isn't really much game left in this game. Unlike some, I don't want to mistake ships for content (meaning game content)...

Have a KitKat too!

I see something good, I see something bad: To me that kind of changes, don't they point to improved gunnery? If they do, is this going to be an indication of some upcoming change in the game balance or just intended make certain ships perform better? Another thing, if we start getting improved gunnery and range increases, the maps which are already too small and crowded, will get even worse to play on.... ...and having said that I probably am missing the whole picture...

The longer I try to make headway with this campaign, the less I have to say I like it. The problem is that not only does it seem to progress slower than the previous campaigns, but I've noticed I now play 'too much' tiers 8-10 and ignore some of my favourite ships from lower tiers as any battles on them won't contribute to the campaign in the slightest.

I don't much agree with fictional modernizations.. unless it is something barely noticeable like upgraded AA or slightly improved guns which does not alter the historical appearance of the ship. Whereas with ships which did undergo a refit or a number of refits like the Kongo, I think WG should change the MM so that it becomes hull/refit dependent.

Leaked footage from WeeGee's super secret Russian carrier programme.

I just wish for some opportunities to play Mutsu or all those very nice low to mid tier ships out there... The problem of lack of content (yes content, not ships...) for anything below 8/9 tiers is now getting worse than ever. I especially noticed this in connection with the current 'campaign'. Sorry for derailment attempt, please feel free to ignore my rant.

Cheers, got accepted still.

Crate drop in game. EDIT oops sorry thought you meant OP link.

Lots of hick-ups lately...

Why do they think the game benefits from having ships that are useless?

Curiously, there is no Lenin BB there...

Cheers, mate!

Why can people still smoke freely in battles? It's 2020, we should strive to make this a smoke free community.

Correct. More napkins have gone missing.

Those 'instances' you mean? No idea how many of those they are normally running. I assume the total number we see is all those combined, unlike in WoT where it shows the actually number on that server you are playing on (EU1 or EU2).

Very rarely at least interesting if not good (dunno?) things can drop. It is apparently a CV in DD shape.