Karasu_Browarszky

Cheers again, OP! This maybe a dumb question, but what is GENUSGADUS? It sounds like a Monty Python character...

350 ships.. wow that's one expensive piece of crap.

As a young boy me and my mother once got to stand on the deck of the Vasa (no, not when it still sailed I'm not antediluvian) . I've told this story before (not senile yet), wish I could tell you what the inside of the cabin looked like but it was pitch black darkness in there. The ship was black as well, it was still in the process of preservation at that time, so it was constantly being doused with some kind of chemical compound.

You'd think we had some Norwegian ship then though...

You can get SC's with the current TYL containers at least. Just got one a couple of weeks ago. However, I don't advice TYLing too often, because unless you get a SC, you lose out. Clan containers? Those I haven't even heard of.

This might not be a good time to bring up the fact that one of my many cousins once wanted to sink your whole navy... ... but it looks nice enough for a new port.

I've bought better looking crap badges from the drug store when I was a kid. The 300 one is the least crappy of the lot, though, the lower ones are even worse. Still looks like it's been buried in the ground for a few decades...

Even if you lose.

Also, gambling is addictive and habit forming. ..........

Had to manually type the second one, then it worked, cheers!

I can happily go without their loot boxes as long as they won't ban boxes of chocolate.

This happens when the lookouts fall asleep while on duty. Discipline is too lax, you need to run a tighter ship, mate.

Worked, cheers!

I use my trusty Asashio to slip into battle quickly. To the delight of the many BB's there, I pack an unlimited supply of my famous fishy gifts. Wut!

Yes, if you use that information constructively as in your example above.

A very Russian Tsushima Experience we could say.... Yes. It is important to remember that even if someone thinks their team mates play like bots, you will get very human responses from them in return.

TBH, I get royally ****ed off when I get remarks about my stats and performance while in battle. I may blow a fuse, but I'd never start purposefully killing or sinking my team mates. The reason I get pissed is not because of my stats, but because they seem to question if I have the right to be in the same battle as they do. This is in reality IMO insulting. The stats themselves, my own or anybody else's do not mean anything to me while in battle. I always will try to put maximum effort into every battle (unless I'm distracted in RL or too tired to focus late at night.. I know, time to log out and hit the sack). So should everyone else, perhaps doubly so if they spot or suspect some team members are not up to the job. Just those 2 cents of mine.

I did manage to do pretty well in battle with the Bayern, though I did not top the results, I feel I contributed decisively to the winning outcome. But ****** that, I'm just using that as a pretext because I want share how mind blowingly beautiful ship the original hull version of the Bayern looks (and still performs reasonably well).

I feel I must correct you on that point, it may have escaped your attention that the Scummas event gave us not one but two ships and it was entirely possible to get both of them free. Doctored by Karasu_Hidesuke after posting to recant preposterous claims.

There are the class limitations, indeed. If one class dominates the MM, that class will also dominate the battle, whatever the class. But if the MM is balanced, they will need to coordinate their tactics properly in order to win the battle. If you got a good team, that can happen. If the red team has a good team, let's just say you ain't gonna win that one.

This^ BTW, when I said 'karma' in an earlier post, I wasn't referring to the in-game concept, in case that is how OP understood it.

From a legal point of view, and the game rules help you determine the blame in that regard. You can still make the argument that from an ethical point of view OP's chosen path of action is questionable. There is, of course, no rule based consequence for that, but in a moral sense you may still get your just desserts and then you'll have to live with that.

I agree. Everyone is responsible for their actions, but it is indeed sometimes unclear how the blame is attributed later on. Those are actually very good examples, I suppose this is where established principles come into play and there is some kind of proportionality that becomes the deciding factor, and there is also a difference between a rule based framework (such as the law) and and ethical/moral one.

Correct. Everyone is responsible for their own actions. It gets a little complicated when something starts off a chain reaction, of course.

He does not know, but if what follows happens as a consequence of his words (or other actions), he bears the responsibility due to there being a causal relationship. If what happens is unrelated, then there is no responsibility. The point, however, is that you never know or even can know exactly what the effect is, but the responsibility remains.