-
Content Сount
13,025 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
-
Clan
[I-J-N]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by Karasu_Browarszky
-
CV protection by matchmaking
Karasu_Browarszky replied to FixCVs_Nautical_Metaphor's topic in General Discussion
@FixCVs_Nautical_Metaphor -
CV protection by matchmaking
Karasu_Browarszky replied to FixCVs_Nautical_Metaphor's topic in General Discussion
Use a full AA build. Problem solved! -
WG wants you to join the Dark Side. Pro tip: they got cookies!
-
The sheer amount of money WG could make but doesn't
Karasu_Browarszky replied to FixCVs_Nautical_Metaphor's topic in General Discussion
So... active non-campy blob might be the answer? Maintain formation and screen for maximum AA bubble effect. Shatter opposition, re-deploy, rinse and repeat. Requires team play capable teams. -
Yeah, 3 DD's with a balanced torp/gun build selection could devastate the enemy flank by flank. IMO, you wouldn't want to split it up too early but use the division initially for maximum impact.
-
The sheer amount of money WG could make but doesn't
Karasu_Browarszky replied to FixCVs_Nautical_Metaphor's topic in General Discussion
This map size is an overall problem in WoWS when it comes to the higher tiers. Almost as if they had optimized the game for tiers 1 to 4, and added all the later tiers into the same matrix. The technology of the eras the game covers are so vastly different from each other, that they should have basically designed the game anew to match tier progression. They didn't, though, and we get to enjoy the mess. -
So why does that happen to me all the time..
-
The sheer amount of money WG could make but doesn't
Karasu_Browarszky replied to FixCVs_Nautical_Metaphor's topic in General Discussion
It's one of those vexed issues, IMO. They break the lower tiers, but.. historically speaking, the carriers need to be present in WW2 tiers, and they would need to be present in some scenario battles as well. Ideally, the question is how to manage that without breaking game balance in the process. -
The sheer amount of money WG could make but doesn't
Karasu_Browarszky replied to FixCVs_Nautical_Metaphor's topic in General Discussion
Curious, what led you to that assumption? -
The sheer amount of money WG could make but doesn't
Karasu_Browarszky replied to FixCVs_Nautical_Metaphor's topic in General Discussion
This is their combat role... and for this reason you would either have carrier battles or engagements where the carriers are either absent or capable of only fulfilling a support role. For reasons of variety, we need both IMO, but perhaps the carrier battles should be a separate mode like I posted above, because the meta is so completely different from cruiser/DD engagements, or engagements where the BB's are the most lethal capital ships around. -
Watching out for radar and planes you can try to actively spot the enemy screen in the hopes that your team is actually one of those rare teams good enough to actually shoot at them.
-
There's an added problem with DD's between you and your target. They will give early warning to any BB's behind them so they will have plenty of time to evade your torps.
-
Will depend on CV, radar, and enemy DD's. If you manage it, you will probably hit better, though. Mind you, German BB's are especially bad cause they can detect your torps early enough to completely avoid them even at short ranges.
-
I may have some Goth ancestors!
-
Wut?
-
The sheer amount of money WG could make but doesn't
Karasu_Browarszky replied to FixCVs_Nautical_Metaphor's topic in General Discussion
Massive fraud... -
The sheer amount of money WG could make but doesn't
Karasu_Browarszky replied to FixCVs_Nautical_Metaphor's topic in General Discussion
Comrade, switch to Rushan language client! -
Seems they will dodge them anyway... except for the unlucky few who have yet to discover the Secrets of the WASD.
-
The sheer amount of money WG could make but doesn't
Karasu_Browarszky replied to FixCVs_Nautical_Metaphor's topic in General Discussion
Well, we get a lot of Tier X only battles now, do there must be less of those 8-10 battles (presumably). All of this could have been easily avoided if WeeGee had opted for era based balancing instead. -
The sheer amount of money WG could make but doesn't
Karasu_Browarszky replied to FixCVs_Nautical_Metaphor's topic in General Discussion
Yeah, it ain't just the CV's that are a problem, though I think the distribution could be different and maybe we should have a separate 'Carrier Battles' mode not just randoms, in which case there shouldn't be any CV's in the randoms but this might just be a 'dream' knowing WeeGee. There's a ton of other things that needs to be fixed, not just the CV's. I've seen the game go from very promising to very frustrating during the past 5 years. Not happy about it. -
Black Friday combat missions are deceiving...
Karasu_Browarszky replied to Boondigo's topic in General Discussion
Sorry to break this to you, but this is a 'known issue'. As you said, it's not really misleading but, as always, with WeeGee you have to read the fine print. Anyway, enjoy your new ship!- 36 replies
-
- 2
-
-
- black friday
- premium
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Dont buy the Black Friday bundles...
Karasu_Browarszky replied to DFens_666's topic in General Discussion
Premium advice, cheers! -
Thankfully a sale I don't have the slightest interest in.
-
Which forum members have you seen in random battles?
Karasu_Browarszky replied to Cobra6's topic in General Discussion
Ee...uhm... We had a fantastic battle. I'll leave it to @Khaba_Gandalf to fill in the particulars.. as they were, while I make myself scarce.
