Karasu_Browarszky

Well, this is nothing new. It's been the same for years. The reasoning is that the cost is relative to the lower earnings in Russia, as opposed to EU. Russia (monthly) https://www.statista.com/statistics/1010660/russia-average-monthly-nominal-wage/ Germany (annual) https://www.statista.com/statistics/416207/average-annual-wages-germany-y-on-y-in-euros/ That's about 50 000 rubles a month (about 575 euros) vs. 3500 euros per month.

Coop specialists in high tier randoms would explain a lot of what I see there... some of them make me look good...

Rocks, small maps, HE spam, angry clouds both with supernatural and regular aim, island huggers, bad tactics... did I mention rocks?

Cheers!

Someone who is very good and makes tons of credits and XP?....

Excellent options! This wouldn't be a bad thing if we had proper maps allowing for tactical play. Though, it would lead to a different play style and longer battles which some people find undesirable. I don't.

There isn't much to write home about currently. The game is somewhat viable in operation, coop, and random on tiers 5 to 7. Higher up, we mostly get into PITA territory. Oh... and isn't it funny, how every time you try to actually carry out either an evasive or an offensive maneuver with your ship, there's an effing rock right exactly where you intend to turn. How they do it? Seriously, how the **** do the WG devs know the exact locations on every map where you decide to turn the helm......

We have 'spreadsheet events'. We don't have that many real events.

Oddly the 'error' is always on the receiving end, WG itself is never at fault.

EU getting new content then? They are so spoiling us!

Curiously, most people haven't picked up on Friesland having a very specific captain build. Still.. they don't seem to mind as WG has told us....

But the community has spoken and WG listened (very uncharacteristically I might add but I digress..). People do not want Friesland in the Dutch tech tree. They want to keep it in the Pan-Flutey line up, and WG has obliged.

As if getting screwed over once is not enough... TBH, if the trade-in would work like it does in WoT, this would be a very bad idea. You'd paying throwing good money after bad, because essentially you'd be handing over a tank that you no longer want to get a tank no one wanted in the first place. In other words, they don't let you trade your old tanks for anything good that you might want.

Isn't that exactly what some clans do when they re-enact famous battles? I've seen some vids on the Platform-Where-Sun-Does-Not-Shine.

I see... the test server must be located upstairs right above the game servers then.

I don't see a problem with that.

PSST... Wait till it's Halloweeeen.

Sometimes the best challenge comes in the shape of your team mates.

Ah... earlier today I watched a whole episode of Jingles about some Flying purple warship eater. 'Except that they aren't there... they used to be...'' I have to agree (and you don't even have to twist my arm for it). Some ops are more enjoyable than others, and several of the more enjoyable ones.... aren't there... any more.

Ah, but you can't get the feel of the ship unless you been on her yourself, mate.

OP calls it 'Apollo', so we don't know. My gut feeling is it was Makarov...

Suing is really the last resort, you don't want to go there. The thing is, in the EU they have to comply with both EU and national regulations. If they don't, the correct address to contact is your national consumer protection agency.

This looks to be heading into the old argument about 'digital goods'. Meanwhile, if a company like WG has a refund policy, they should make sure every customers is aware of it, and they should stick to it consistently. Most of use who have been around longer know it's the 'one battle played only' rule, though I myself was not aware there is also a time limit in place. I can't actually even say where I learnt it was 'one battle only', now that I think about it....

Daily login.

I don't like to gamble... oh, wait...