Karasu_Browarszky

The process should be wholly transparent for obvious reasons. It is not unreasonable to expect to get a full refund after one (1) battle played only.

.. and you can dive too!

You got that right. There's a reason I got only two vids on my personal channel. If I ever was going to start uploading more vids, I'd use a non-personal channel to do it. And keep local backups. Always. YouTube allows for the DMCA to be abused every wich way, and generally has the exact same level of respect for it as a passing stray dog has for the fire hydrant. Simply put, different rules for different users, and the criteria to go by is how much revenue they bring to YouTube... or not.

And, regardless, it still isn't a valid copyright issue. However, YouTube is a bit of a twilight zone when it comes to copyright law....

Oh you sweet summer child...

Well, in the past you could take out the Missouri, start the battle, go put the kettle on and come back to collect a nice bundle. Profit!

I just don't know if they can legally place conditions on any single person, or if it's a blanket policy that remains the same for everyone. CC's are a matter of internal policy, so it depends on what the terms are there, of couse. They can terminate his CC status, but then again, I don't really see how this becomes a valid copyright issue. I suppose they could get an injunction against him but that is way above my head when it comes to legal stuff. YouTube will shut down a channel due to copyright strikes, yes, and notably whether those copyright strikes are legit or not (it's not like they give a f*** anyway). They will also close down a channel over ToS/content violations. However, does this qualify for that? Remember also, that corporations have no honor to defame, so it can't be a libel/slander case either, though I don't know if devs as representatives are individuals (they might be if they get targeted with personal attacks) or covered by the 'corporate entity' blanket. Nope. Still gets done, though. You can misuse it, or rather abuse it. Most if not all regular channels have no means of actually fighting wrongful copyright claims.

Might still turn out to be disaster. There's only one 'entity' in the world who is allowed to freely piss on the DMCA. And it ain't WG....

Okay. This is largely academic for me, as I don't use any sort of signal flags any more.

The point is, are they still more effective to use with the Missouri, as opposed to using them on other ships? I take it you mean they give the exact same bonus no matter the ship, and I inferred this was not the case previously with the Missouri.

Stackable bonuses?

If these issues only effect you, there could be an issue with your PC. (Clean up maybe needed, drivers/browser/software updated, how's your anti virus?) Have you tried different browsers if they all act up the same way?

Will it tell me if my stern looks too big?

So... in order to gain something and not lose out on something, the best cause of action is to run the Missouri without the additional credit modifiers? This means your choices are limited to just two, both of which will farm you fewer credits than what you could potentially farm previously, the only choice you have is whether to commit extra resources to it or not. Indubitably.

That does sound strange. You might want to submit a ticket on issue, as there might be restrictions applied in different countries, but I don't think what you are describing fits that.

Is this some kind of a country based restriction?

Sometimes not even 3 good players can carry a teamfull of noobs.

Sorry to break this to you, but I'm retired from ranked so....

I have several. All of them have those cursed rocks on them.

That's just what the famous Russian admiral Dzhon Pol Dzhons used to say!

Aggressive players can lose which will lead to the team losing. Aggressive teams that engage in team play are much more powerful, though they can still be defeated, as long as the team that has to go on the defense can counter the aggression fast enough. You are right about good players, as all things being equal, the team with the better players invariably wins (not always, however). The issue here, however, is that it only takes a couple of better players to make the difference (especially when they play in a division). I think it's somewhat problematic that the meta favors skilled individuals over skilled teams.

NC was a very good tier 8 BB, but my impressions are, of course, many years old.

The Colorado actually has pretty decent guns... only, by the time she actually gets 'there', there's precious little to shoot at.

Cheers!