Karasu_Browarszky

Gettin harder to tell them apart day by day, though, ain't it?

So.. there'd be like a buoy with a flag stuck on it? I'd see some potential as a special event mode (with respawning) but... I just wish we'd see more 'engagement based' action in the regular game modes.

Two threads on this.

You mean the general change that pretty much wrecked AA for all ships? It also wrecked my cruiser play .. in general (**** you ever so much WG ).. because I used to run most of my CL/CA's with AA builds to have the ability to support the capital ships and DD's in battle.

At first, the forum pages could not get reached this morning. Then, a couple of minutes later, reloading the page brought it up. A little worse than usual, but I'm pretty much experiencing a degree of slowness constantly, with long load times and having problems quite frequently with notifications and trying to check on those. EDIT Saving and editing comments is also noticeably slow today.

The Misery scandal is not directly comparable, because the Missouri is a premium ship that was available for Free XP and the token price of 1 (one) credit. So, the Missouri is not a special ship but one of the old true premium ships that we thought WG(mz) would not dare to touch.

Playable mines er?...

Anyone want to come up and see my NFT's?

Best have no expectations or you may be liable to get disappointed. There's still the case of that steam engine model I was wanting for some Xmas many many.... many years ago.

FTFY

If we consider that 'historical accuracy' is a smoke screen (with a boost bonus), what are they concealing? If it is as innocent as 'game balance reasons', why the need for the smoke screen then?

So, you may get a free monthly copyright strike thrown into the bargain. Sounds like a real sweet deal.

@Aethervoxx You need to follow current events in Soviet history to stay up to date with the most recent events in history. It's less about historical accuracy, per se, but more about making sure you get history accurately...

Well.. it's Soviet historical accuracy we talking about here... so you catch my drift?

I take it does not mean they'll be paying us....

Opinions may differ, but to me it seems the best policy is to go for the highest drop rate for whatever you are after, as you are saying. For ships this would be the mega containers, for other things you'd have to look at the list of announced drop rates.

I know. I have the solution. Remove the islands!

Reminds me of WoT. At one time it was possible to span inside the rocks there. That was for keepers though.

Well, the old system was definitely not fair to small clans, if you got faced with a bigger clan you might just as well forget about it for that weekend because you had very little to gain. In the group system, all depends of course if you actually get something in proportion to your individual and combined clan effect if the change is fair or not.

I've yet to complete this collection, but I'm close to getting to stage 5 on ASIA. Will keep an eye on how it turns out.

Good thing it's all sorted, as I find this new 'Group' format more interesting and dynamic than the old one which was somewhat sterile and clinical. Think most agree with this.

Sounds more (than) likely given WG's penchant for corridor maps....

Dahlak?

The opinion seems to be divided then.