Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

Karasu_Browarszky

Players
  • Content Сount

    13,025
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

  • Clan

    [I-J-N]

Everything posted by Karasu_Browarszky

  1. Karasu_Browarszky

    [POLL] Has wargaming made the playerbase indifferent?

    ... and wishing, no doubt, that they'd be indifferent to you as well.
  2. Karasu_Browarszky

    [POLL] Has wargaming made the playerbase indifferent?

    My wallet cares. Seriously, I only play anywhere from a couple of battles to half a dozen or slightly more per day nowadays, which is a considerable drop from previous years and is not just about me having played this game for close to seven years. The seven years matters, because it gives me a lot of perspective when it comes to various things. WG consistently make the exact type of decisions which reduce the fun and engaging aspects of this game for me. I view things like the crap storms and the overall shenanigance with questionable monetizing separately from what I see and experience in the game (or lack thereof). Both these discourage me to spend much more on the game, but only the latter discourages me from playing more.
  3. Karasu_Browarszky

    BTW, Thank you, Wargaming

    Surely it's Schnapps, not vodka. Pros't!
  4. Karasu_Browarszky

    We need Kamchatka!

    Perfect for a convoy mode I'd say. Now we only need some OP fishing trawlers lying in wait somewhere in the fog.
  5. Karasu_Browarszky

    So what happened to my / Großer Kurfürst

    It's not actually in the tech tree (at least not without mods). The port shows it though.
  6. The sticking point seems to be where the airship routes converge. Obviously control of the arrival zone matters as well.
  7. When I took a spin in the race, I was on a smoke free DD, and found it a little difficult to make up my mind what I should do. I didn't encounter the enemy DD's in the mid map position, so what I tried to do was spam torps in the direction of the BB's instead. With rather lacklustre results though...
  8. What I observed when trying this mode, in the first part you focus on sinking as many ships as you can to improve your chances of winning. Seems rather self explanatory, in a sense. In the latter part you focus on blocking the enemy airship, and this is, perhaps unexpectedly, easier if your team did well in the first half of the battle.
  9. Karasu_Browarszky

    I want oared warships in this game

    Sounds like Greek bias...
  10. From that I point of view I can agree. I don't lose in coop nearly as often as I do in randoms.
  11. I hide my stats, whatever the season.
  12. Karasu_Browarszky

    Possible Fix for long login times

    Okay, so you end the Error monitor 32 only when you get stuck in the 'Game loading' screen. Interesting. Though, it can also be related to any ongoing server problems. I get the 'Error Connecting Server' occasionally, and it may be due to the servers or latency on my part.
  13. Karasu_Browarszky

    Possible Fix for long login times

    Uhm.. er... I tried this, disabling the error monitor gives you a pretty instant 'Press any key' to log in... however, the 'Logging in' stays there for a few minutes, then it moves onto 'Game loading', with like 3 to 4 minutes more of mesmerizing swirling to see, until finally I achieved this.
  14. Karasu_Browarszky

    Preussen - One hit "No" wonder

    @Aragathor Well at least the camo looks good.
  15. Karasu_Browarszky

    New update is here...

    Are the servers now Sub_Octavian's responsibility? Is that his new job with WG?
  16. Karasu_Browarszky

    Preussen - One hit "No" wonder

    Do we have a LWM review on the Preussen?
  17. Karasu_Browarszky

    Preussen

    Indeed.. I typically play "bonfire".
  18. Karasu_Browarszky

    Sub_O is moving on

    Yes, he demonstrated that there was indeed a way to get Puerto Rico for free. It's just that the way he did it revealed the full hypocracy behind WG's statement.
  19. Karasu_Browarszky

    the new subs

    The core problem that WG can't solve is that submarines are essentially completely different from surface ships of any description in terms of tactical combat and what is required of them, and what should be within the range of their capabilities. In short, they need to rely much more on passive tactics because for them every engagement is 'hard commit'. That's how they are supposed to be successful, whereas surface ships need to take a much more active role. They can't really make the subs into a 'passive playstyle element', because that won't work in the randoms. (Whereas it might work very well in 'Convoy Operations'...) So, it seems they've opted to give the subs unnatural abilities to make them playable in an active role against surface ships. Bollocks, is what I say.
  20. Karasu_Browarszky

    Nice monetizaton

    No effing way I'm paying that much for one random ship, especially as are already have some of those, and don't need any more. Especially at that price.
  21. Hard to say... do you go by what they say or what they fail to say. What was the exact wording in the news when the camo became available... Haven't seen that mentioned, and you never find anything in the News afterwards if you go looking... EDIT Found the article: All it says is https://worldofwarships.eu/en/news/game-updates/update-0110-pan-asian-cruisers-part-1/ So anyone's guess is as good as mine. Best case scenario, it will stay available. Who knows for sure, though. @XDMeloniXD if it's availabe for 0 credits now, why don't you get it. It's not like you are likely to get a better deal in the future.
  22. What they tell us: https://worldofwarships.eu/en/news/game-updates/update-0111-pan-asian-cruisers-part-2/
  23. Karasu_Browarszky

    the new subs

    I'm gonna go check that my wallet is closed, just in case...
  24. Karasu_Browarszky

    the new subs

    Infrared equipment.
×