Bear__Necessities

(and yet....)

Thinking about it. I know we ALL know WG don't know how to balance. But after looking through the Buffs... I mean errrr "balance changes". I could not help feel this is also in a large part due to the direct actions of the player base. Think about it. Very few people actually bothered enough to test them, even less after the second round of changes. The players actively punished their own by mass reporting every sub player in sight, as well as sending some LOVELY personal messages :P , meaning on top of actually being boring, good to great players in subs had literally no reason to bother playing them as it was more of a hassle than reward. This meant only the taytos were left to play them.... giving us this via giving WG data that showed subs as weak etc etc. We as the player base also have to take some responsibility. We gave WG EVERY excuse to buff subs. This is why we got CV rework. Because the player base moaned about them constantly and dismissed the unicum CV players as "an elite out of touch group" (which they STILL do even now in THIS stage of CV balance). And in a twisted way, this is almost justified by WG. Almost....

Subs reset the other day so takes players time to re-get them via exp earning

Ohhh sweet summer child, you think I don't how play subs?

Spoken like someone who's got no skill in Subs.

" Submarines can no longer be detected with the Surveillance Radar consumable at the periscope depth."

I'm just saying it's awfully convenient that a bug is unleashed that makes AA and Secondary mounts invincible at the exact same time as they want players to whale on German BB's who gimmick is secondaries. And the bug nerfs the biggest threat to BB's. Those being DD's and CV's. Yes. I'm aware I sound like the normal tin foil hat brigade and it's likely "coincidence". But then again, this IS WeeGee we are discussing....

Moskva has a bit more versitility in the shell department. It's AP and HE are good. Petro has brilliant AP but crap HE. Petro has the better armour scheme and can take more or a beating. Moskva however is better at kiting. I have both. Like both.

Hardly. It's more it's played by potato's who have bought onto the Russian bais of it being invincible. It's one of the most dangerous T10 ships there is due to its pure ability to swing a game on a penny. Most utility boats are more dangerous than none utility and Petro is a beast.

Ohhh ffs

Ignoring our CV expert :P The T10 certainly is not be underestimated with. Especially divisioned with other T10 Scheffs or complimentary ships.

The servers especially at this time of the year become overloaded. If it becomes persistent then send a ticket. They are normally quiet good at giving prem time or some sort of compensation for this..

You were previously offered advice on this ship. You rubbished everyone who gave it. I don't expect this to go far. But who knows... Kremlin is not a BB designed for long range. It does not excel at long range and should NOT be set up for long range. If you cannot get past this concept. All other advice will be pointless. So, it's on you to decide if you want to play it to it's strengths or keep failing at trying to make it something it isn't.

Needs more range apparently.

Stay bad then. We don't care.

You've not earned it.

Why, apart from AA the ship hasn't been changed.

I can make it work and BB's are my weakest class. Soyuz plays the same way btw so here's another high tier Russian BB using it's strenghts.

You've already had this explained MULTIPLE times. It's a BB BEST suited to medium/close range. If you can't make it work, try another line. The Repub is better suited to range for instance.

Because it does not need it. Believe it or not. BB's should not all be played as far away as possible. Shocking to hear for you we imagine.

Played EU for the 1st time in a long time. Felt goooood. Pick of the bunch with the loss being the best of course....

It's stupid and broken.

So, getting better at the game and learning how to mitigate damage whilst getting good results is actually a bad thing in your view... OK...