Bear__Necessities

Don't come back.

Hahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahaha Ohhh wait. You're being serious? Hahahahahahahaha. Just look at all this lossing I'm suffering currently on NA. Wow. They are REALLY hammering down to 50% here... https://na.wows-numbers.com/player/1036458028,Vasili_One_Bonk_only/

In short. The better WR a player has, the more influence they've made in games to win. This scales up in some cases for divisions (not always regardless of what the baying mob who hate divisions say). It's seen as a good measurement to go off a players solo winrate with a generally good spread of tiers and ships. Though you'll find some players excel in only the class they play and enjoy. And some are just great across all. Anything above 52/55% and most would class you as a good player. Certainly above average. 55/59% very good. 60% and above. Unicum. Or top 1/2% of the player base.

So why do some of us just keep on winning more than losing?....

They don't even know their own codes. Never mind picking any of that up. I mean, how many farming bots do you still active in this game. I've seen the same few now on NA for instance that have been there at least 2/3 years now.

He also failed to note that while the CV got "6 kills" it's exp even with it being lesser than other classes still still just below a T8 DD with 1 kill and just above a Fletcher and Ragnar. Almost like the CV just picked off low HP targets and farmed a little of BB's.... So. are DD's actually OP? Is MM rigged? Or is this just one of the MANY examples of a game that's truly put together by random MM. I know which is significantly more likely and saves me buying tin foil.

So what your saying is MM is random. Got ya.

Right... so, why do players still manage really good win rates, playing solo and in tech line ships.... Kinda disproves all your tin foil hat thoughts in one.

OP makes a click bait thread.... I'd never expect that from them...

It's ok. The bots are better than most of the player base.

CV planes becoming magically immune to damage when in strike mode.

No. The point is every rant and moan about cheats cherry picks a MM like this when they lose. The NEVER show the ones where they won. Which they won't ever because it would show MM is balanced by being random. And according to some CV's are balanced.... And the CV did not win 1 v 12. The fact I killed their CV early and drew 4 ships away was a huge factor. Hence top score finish.

Playing solo. Bottom tier. MM says my team should lose. We didn't. "BuT mM iS rIgGeD"....

Small violin playing just for you here.

Clowns to the left and potato's to the right, stuck in the middle with me ;)

To be honest I play a lot of T10 to purely to keep my skills in the ships at that tier up to scratch as CW is normally always T10. I like T7/8/9 far more. All the fun ships for me live in those tier brackets.

Some of us like and enjoy the challenge of being up tiered. And only T10 v T10, all the time? Boring as F***.

A) my comment was humour. A joke ffs. B) WG don't listen to us most of the time anyway. C) The last bit? Grow up.

Being as only 4% or less of the player population touch them. The data sides with boring and unfun. Not opinion. It's a statistical fact with evidence to back it up.

Or, maybe they are boring to play..... and unfun to play against.....

Still trying to derail using an incorrect example......

Small sample size yadda yadda etc etc. But I played 6 games last night and today and there was not a a single significant difference in any of the team. Now I've downloaded MM I can't wait to show how even teams actually are and that it's only the extreme outliners that are rare, yet ALWAYS cherry picked as an excuses for lost games. Rather than the common and obvious denominator....

You want to make Petro more accurate and have better HE? Sure. I'm up for that.