Bear__Necessities

Bumped into @___V_E_N_O_M___ Sailing his ShinyHorse on the opposite team while I was Big E. Sorry for that triple cit buddy. You were the only lone target at that time. Still a close game, even if it didn't look it coz my lot were one mistake away from potatoing through the whole game

Freedom of speech applies to governments. Not the property of private companies. This a page IS created by a private company. They can place what rules and restriction they want. If you’re not happy with that. Rules like not spamming the the forum with the same threads hourly. There is a perfectly good sub thread on the Re-worked CV’s which is very well used.

It’s a moan thread. From the off. Nothing you say or do will change the obviousness of that.

As I did quote it clearly. Have you read your own post? Because other than moaning about mods and not being “listened” to you didn’t actually offer any suggestion about CV’s. The suggestions that have since been put forward have already been discussed in multiple threads multiple times. It’s like Groundhog Day in the forum now.

Your opening thread wasn’t even about CV suggestions. I was a moan. From the off. Frankly multiple threads on the same thing frankly get boring. And currently CV threads outnumber all the threads about all the other classes combined. WE GET IT. Players don’t like CV’s. We have the same thread every day.

Do you people not read? We have a MASSIVE thread about CV’s ongoing. It’s pinned to the top! We don’t need endless threads on the same topic when we can just have the one for the love of cheese and wine.

More have already started to spread the word of Big E, we will never stop!!

WG employee: Boss, this guy almost has a 90% WR in the Saipan. WG Boss: You know what to do. WG employee: You sure? WG Boss: I'm sure, unleash the potatos!! (Both laugh maniacally) Me....

The CV will die. Already half HP. The 2 remaining CV’s will have had no problem finishing that other CV off. It’s a poor move no matter how anyone tries to present it. However the OP didn’t present the final end game screen that would have proved the whole thread pointless.

The CV in this case made a massive error of Judgement. Going into a cap with surface ships around and able to shoot at them is a No No. Going into a cap with no other AA support against a combined enemy focus including both CV's is a No No... They have the lead, are equal on ships and the CV that yolo'd the cap has then effectively thrown any chance of a win. They will lose the points from the CV. They will be down in air attack and defence. With more than 4 mins left on the cards the game is now entirely the other teams to lose. This example of being a "warship" is the worst one I can think of. If anything those 2 remain CV's sticking together will probably get them the win... Point of this thread then??? None. Nothing. Nada. Zilch.

Yes... and No. Yes, for the fact you have no chance to return damage in such an encounter, other than shooting some planes down, which depending on DD is... well... yeah... *looks at Kamikaze's "AA"* No..... ish?? On the counter point that another class like a BB can one shot a full HP cruiser without ever being seen, yet that is acceptable for the player base overall... I don't know what the answer is I'm afraid. I am still a DD main, however since I've been playing CV's the last 3/4 weeks I haven't felt the urge to be on the other end of them. Not that's it's stopped me doing well when I have been in DD's... but I've been playing the game since it was pretty much released so have seen all the changes and this for me just another change. I don't think we'll be able to judge the full CV effect until after summer when the "new rework" phase has died down and now lines have become the in thing (RU BB's for example)

I've lost count the amount of times I've been flying planes to a big obvious target and a DD sails right through my predicted path with AA on. If they had just kept AA off and changed course they would not have been spotted and become my new priority target. I've said in this forum before, that DD play now requires the highest skill level to succeed. But players (not saying OP or anything) still make potato mistake after potato mistake and wonder why they are being punished for it. So many DD's smoke.... then leave their smoke... what was the point? OK, I'll just DB you after all then.... This isn't just a CV is the problem issue... this is the playerbase still not learning issue. Not adapting, I mean not learning from countless mistakes.

There was a little bit at the bottom of that post that said "but I can say what I want, i'm not an elitist stat padder snobbby pink peacock, ner nerrr ne nerr nerrrr"

My team decided to throw the game with a 2-1 cap advantage and healthy 250 point lead by yolo'ing needlessly into the open...But I at least achieved my highest damage in Midway trying my best on my own to hold out for points and time... so there is that.... Ohhhh and Saipan is quite extraordinary, so strong. Loving it so far.

It's the weekend!!

Print screen key died valiantly and... NO! I will not stop clubbing! Clubs for the club god!

Please excuse the poor screenies. Print Screen decided to go on strike today. Well. When your surface ships decide to potato, it’s time to carry hard or go home. Saipan times

Well, I did find an ancient text called "I dOn'T bElIeVe In StAtS tHe WoRlD iS rUn By ElItIsT pEaCoCkS". I used that as a base route of translation. But I didn't help much. So, just put them on the ignore list. Problem solved.

Honestly chaps. Just use the ignore function for this individual. Saves a lot of “wtf’ing”. I do however feel your concerns. I’ve been pretty much playing CV for a couple of weeks now. And have no urge to go back to surface ships for a while. I got my kicks out of DD’ing in CW’s. Now? I’m just waiting for CV numbers to stabilise and then reassess. RU BB’s should lower the CV numbers. 1 CV per team is quite manageable. It’s when there are 2 per team I found being in a DD... not fun. Not impossible. Just not fun.

1. Kamikaze 2. Cossack 3. Enterprise (re-work) 4. Minotaur 5. De Grasse & Henri equally.

I approve