Jump to content

Steinfall

Players
  • Content Сount

    29
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    2118
  • Clan

    [PH-FL]

About Steinfall

  • Rank
    Able Seaman
  • Insignia

Recent Profile Visitors

154 profile views
  1. Steinfall

    Nerf the Conqueror ...

    Because you clearly can't do it Why should I read a text which is insulting me? A text from s person who loves to bring discussion on such a personal level? By making fun of my limited English-skills you proved that you are even not thinking about, that I may be not an English native-speaker. Wir können die Diskussion auf deutsch weiterführen, aber ich akzeptiere, dass das hier ein englisches Forum ist. translation: we could go on having this discussion in German, but I accept that this is an English forum. I am just expecting you to show some respect. right now, you are just ignorant, arrogant and insulting. But I give you a chance to develop this discussion. The discussion started when I asked WG to nerf the Conq based on my experiences B.B. vs Conq. Later you confirmed that Conq is superior to all other TX BB. I addition you explained this fact by arguing , that WG was introducing the Conq to stop the dominance of the B.B. This argument is acceptable and I would like to develop the discussion from here. My point would be: if in the current meta B.B. are decisive for a victory and you want to break this dominance. Why would you do it by introducing another B.B. that is even better? because at the end the „old“ B.B. are gone (because it is still a game and people want to have fun; why using a ship that is not fun anymore) and the new B.B. replaces the old ones in a even worse manner. we have a saying in Germany: „den Teufel mit dem Belzebub austreiben“. Translation: „Chasing the devil by calling Diavolo“. Cruisers for example would not increase their battle value when they have to face a ship that summarizes advantages of the Cruiser and B.B. and before you start with „I am only crying“ and „I am not willing to adapt“. I play WG-games for some years. I know from WoT what it means when they change the meta and by that having your favorite tank being suddenly obsolete. I am fine with that. but i do not agree when this happens by calling Diavolo to get rid of the devil
  2. Steinfall

    Nerf the Conqueror ...

    You hadn‘t had a single game in a TX BB vs Conq. So you are just not able to understand. But you agree that Conq is superior to other TX BB and you know about the important role of BB in the current meta. You are getting more and more weird.
  3. Steinfall

    Nerf the Conqueror ...

    Now it is where the fun starts - or where it‘s get pathetic. another example that you are just unable to read and understand. I never complained about the losing streak, which actually could not have been because in between the GK-battles there were other battles which I won. I was only referring to the role the Conquerors took in those battles. But we already had this and you will never learn to read and understand - beside the fact that you already agreed the Conq is un-balanced versus TX BB. But I strongly recommend: - First get a TX BB and start battles with Conq in the other team to learn what we are talking about and: - try to argue in a less arrogant way. This behavior you express here does not really help to underline your simply false statements. just come back when you made the experiences you need to have made in order to be heard.
  4. Steinfall

    Nerf the Conqueror ...

    Guy, you have a major perception problem. for sure it was about B.B. vs Conq. it was me who started this discussion based on the fact, that I lost 10-12 battled in a row with the GK not because I am too stupid to play BB but because I always had 1, 2 or even 3 Conq in the enemy team which could do whatever they want, of course focusing on BB in my team (including me) to get rid of them. anyway, as you even won‘t believe me, why I started the discussion, it just do not make any sense arguing here. several others underlined the initial statement with theory, statistics, experience and you - who never played in a TX BB vs a Conq - still say in an extreme unpolite and annoying way , that we are all wrong. you are just not worth to discuss with me. Not because you may have an argument, but because the way you argue. Just disgusting and a reflection of a poor mind. nevertheless, you at least pretend to give it a try. Bye bye
  5. Steinfall

    Nerf the Conqueror ...

    And one very final argument: as you have stated that you didn’t play TX BB, it’s interesting how much you argue without any experience with what this discussion is about.
  6. Steinfall

    Nerf the Conqueror ...

    And your answer was: „Against BBs, yes.“ so. I refuse to put this level of arrogance in my words like you do in your words. Conq vs BB. This was what the whole discussion in this thread was about!!! (For sure you have read the initial comment in order to contribute to the discussion properly.) now you finally have confirmed, that the Conq is always able to dictate fighting conditions to other BB. And this is called: non-balanced and therefore: re-balance the Conqueror. thank you for finally agreeing
  7. Steinfall

    Nerf the Conqueror ...

    Guy, your arrogance is more than annoying. but one last comment: (see next post)
  8. Steinfall

    Nerf the Conqueror ...

    Wilkatis, this summarizes the whole discussion, brings it to the end and finally explains that you just do not understand the problem. You just do not have any chance to avoid that a Conqueror forces you into a 1-on1-Situation!!! That’s all. and now please do not argue with „teamplsy“, „DD“ or „Cruiser“. Because: the other side has also the same chance for DD and cruiser and teamplay. following your advice to „avoid 1-on1 against Conq“ means to keep a distance of more than 20+ km in the battle which means „ridiculous red line sniper“. Because: As soon as I got spotted and in range of Conq she will burn me with lucky single shots. My AP after 23 km Flight Range just Ding or cause minor damage. so again: tactical advantage for Conq leading to very high chance of taking out enemy BB and by that initiating victory for the team. aks: non-balanced therefore: nerf the Conq (or in other words: balance it) anf therefore: qed, end of discussion. Thank you for finally confirming this
  9. Steinfall

    Nerf the Conqueror ...

    Man, just enter into Reality. whatever you do, the Conq has the TACTICAL ADVANTAGE!!! Sure there are ways to fight a Conq, but at the end, the Conq will always be able to dictate the fighting conditions. JUST ONE EXAMPLE: you said go point blank. Funny. Until I am point blank I lost most of my health because of HE-Spam. And: if the Conq realizes that my plan is to approach, she may evade with ease. Thereby showing me the [edited]which means problems to hit with AP while getting HE-Spam. And: after I decide to go point blank I have no chance to disengage because Conq has better maneuverability. Therefore she keeps me on perfect distance for her HE and keeping the tactical advantage. not to mention that she may get support by DD and Cruisers. which brings me to your next ridiculous quote. I should trust on other DD? Well, in an even situation the Conq may trust on the DD in her team. Having better maneuverability she has better chances to use the situation „support by DD“ for her advantage. Or did you mean that I should use DD or cruiser? Well, this is not topic of this discussion . We are talking about the balance among the class of TX BB. Which means: every B.B. should be able to fight another B.B. due to its own strengths. This works against Monti, Yam and GK but not against Conq. So not balanced. Q.E.D bzt as you said, that my problem is, that I do not know how to do it, I desperately als you to SHOW ME!!! show me links with battles where GK was able to fight Conq in an even situation. Just.show.me
  10. Steinfall

    Nerf the Conqueror ...

    Reading your comment again, I realized that you have just confirmed our opinion: Firstly: yes, I can do a Yam or Montana stealth build. The Conq with stealth build will still be better -> therefore always will have the tactical advantage. Secondly: i am not asking to nerf the strengths of Yamato or Montana because I know how to counter it AND I HAVE THE OPTION TO CONTER IT! Compared to the stealth-mode which I can not conter because compared to a DD which is in serious trouble when its stealth failed and gets big volleys from few km distance, the Conq is stealthy at long distance from where my shells make reduced damage and he answers with HE-Spam. do you see the difference: against Yam, Monti, GK I have the option. Vs Conq I have not unless the Conq-player is too stupid or makes some unlucky mistakes.
  11. Steinfall

    Nerf the Conqueror ...

    Wow, I wasn‘t really aware about that. I always thought, that strong cruiser like Zao could go and make life difficult for Conq. Turned out, that the Conq is an op battlecruiserbattleshipflamethrower. Why give her a squadron of torp-bombers on the catapult? but blackorchid will very soon for sure explain us, that we are just doing wrong and need to adapt.
  12. Steinfall

    Nerf the Conqueror ...

    Guy, please. Open your eyes. it is about gaining and keeping the initiative and using the resulting tactical advantage. a Conq can always force the other player to react and therefore chose the better option in his favor: engage, disengage, hide, chase whatever. The enemy is always outmaneuvered. And even IF both are approaching in good fighting distance: both angles, the one bounced at the angled Conq while the Conq spreads HE with ease. regardless of that. You just get the first damage just because you are in the battle. Depending on the map you get discovered by enemy cruiser or dd... happens quiet fast in a TX BB. Other BB may hit the initial AP-Volley by luck with a few shells making some damage. Conq just needs to hit with a single HE-Shell from 24 km and you have the barbecue. just accept it. as the others have said: take your GK or your Monti and fight a Conq. Upload three or four battles where you show that you have a working tactic and will adapt. Until this proof of concept, I postulate: You are just wrong.
  13. Steinfall

    Nerf the Conqueror ...

    Do you Really Try to understand what we are saying? every bb has its strengths which you Can use to win. montana meets GK, Montana May win if it uses its strengths. gk Meets Monti; the Same. monti meets yamato; the same yamato vs Monti; the same yamato vs GK; same gk vs yamato; Same. GK, Yam or Monti vs Conq or Vice versa: not the Same. Big tactical advantage for Conq. if your tactic against Conq Means Go close: He-spam of Death by Conq if you Need to angle: he-spam of doom if you Need to keep distance: he-spam from hell if you depend of Cruiser Support: Ap-spam of terror while Conq angles Torwards you and bounces. if conq Indeed gets Problems: no Problem to disengange and activate Romulan Cloak device of invisibility. if you want to change Flanks to avoid Conq strategically: She May Follow you in stealth mode and re-start he-spam of surprise. all options mean in conclusion: all major tactical advantages by Conq with good chances to take out enemy BB and by that contributing to the win. this also known as: non-balanced. reduce either stealth or heal or he-spam potential and this ship is Fine. right now your are not depending on your skills nor on skills of teammates but mainly on the stupidity of the enemy Conq-player.
  14. Steinfall

    Nerf the Conqueror ...

    Yes
  15. Steinfall

    Nerf the Conqueror ...

    Please, have you Even Tried to Understand why I Started this discussion? - it was Not crying - it was Not about tactics in teamplay - it was Not about changing the Type of Ship (eg going from BB to DD) it was about one fact: a Conq facing Another BB has all tactical advantages heile the other BB has no Chance to gain Initiative (assuming That Both Players are on Similar skill Level). for all other combinations of BB Meeting each other, one could bring the Individual strengths of this BB and by utilizing this, has the Chance to succeed. No versus a Conq. thats all, an this is what we call non-Balanced. Others confirmed that. Stats confirm that. And this is a unique Situation in this Game due to the stealth of Conq, the fact that it just Need to Hit you regardless of angles and has a Range of primaries that are longer than that of GK. So there is no Chance to Evade if get Attacked nore a Chance to attack as the Conq always Can evade, angle and spam HE - or vanish in stealth-Mode. at the The end the Conq contributed take out Enemy BB and by that the Battle is over. Two or even three Conq in one Division and it is an Auto-Win. And I had exakt such Situations several times in 10+ battles in a row. Thats all. Thank you for Reading
×