MrConway

I'll pass on the feedback!

I would call it more of a side-effect of the game mechanics than a flat-out intention. Kronshtadt performs very well on average and is more suited to long-range engagements. If we were to adjust the fuse time to reduce the number of overpens I can easily see it becoming OP. And while this is of course completely anecdotal, I just played a game to test it and got a very decent ratio of pens/overpens at a variety of ranges - your mileage may very.

We can do an exceptional refund, but only if the ship was played a maximum of one game. This policy is meant to reverse mistakes, not let someone test a ship. The Musashi is however a very good ship, just stick with it! :)

Unfortunately this is a limitation of the system, we cannot just credit the modules if the ship is already researched. I would recommend selling the respective ship before you earn it from the mission to prevent this.

Only the first spot counts for the ribbons, unfortunately the mission description here could be clearer. But this is working as intended.

Yes :(

Judging by the amount of responses here it does not seem to be a widespread issue. Please get in touch with our support team and we'll gladly help you troubleshoot the problem! https://eu.wargaming.net/support/en/products/wows/

Great idea, I included it in the feedback.

I am very sorry to say that I think we have more important UI issues to deal with at the moment ;) In those rare occurences just drop the player a message to let him know you don't want to/can't division.

I agree, we'll take a look.

If we stuck with the old ctrl+click system it would be too trivial to focus on a squad as there will only be the one. Sector control will force you to adjust as you maneuver and the planes change position in order to mantain max DPS.

Like I said, adjustments can be made if it turns out to be an issue. And while the waiting times might not be an issue for you, they will certainly impact anyone wanting to play the CVs.

Please do swing by our stream next Thursday, we've invited some guests from St Petersburg around for an in-depth CV discussion and can hopefully shed some more light on it there.

Unfortunately my lips are sealed in this regard, you'll have to wait for an announcement!

We will see. Luckily matchmaking changes can be applied on the server side without the need for a big update - so we can always intervene if necessary.

Honestly - I have absolutely no idea, this is just the information I was given and am passing on. To me it all sounds Japanese

We felt that spreading the word over two lines would give it more gravitas. In all honesty its an annoying little bug that has been around and known forever - hopefully we'll get around to fixing it eventually. As is often the case with these things, it is probably a lot more complicated to fix than it would seem and tied to some innate UI limitation.

It is very early for math. I have no reason to believe that the information given in the wiki (that the value means the area that 50% of the fired shells will land in) is incorrect. LWMs experimentation also seems to support this. We're planning to have more guests from the Dev team on the stream throughout the year, I'll see if we can maybe do a game mechanics deep-dive if I can find a willing victim ;)

Sitting at tier VI I feel she is a very different subject. The term supercruiser we are using here refers to how we have implemented them in the game (high-tier large cruisers) rather than a historical classification like battlecruiser. Graf Spee is also definitely not in need of any nerfs ;)

That is hard to say, it will take a while for everyone to get used to playing and playing against the new CVs, so I expect us to be making smaller tweaks for a while. So you think we would spend thousands of man-hours developing an entirely new aspect of the game just so we have an excuse to then remove them!? I need more coffee to deal with this level of tinfoil-hattery. Gotta deal with them snowflakes! ;)

That and reviewing the submitted content strike me as the main issues :)

We also look at the owners of the ships whose stats we are looking at, that means we can see if a good or bad player performs better or worse than his average in a given ship.

Of course, but being aware of feedback ≠ agreeing with feedback. The CV rework is certainly still in need of further tweaking and balancing, but there is simply a limit to how much you can do in a test environment. At some point you have to take it to a live audience and we feel that time has come for the CV rework.

With the rework spotter planes and fighters work completely differently, so the direction center no longer affects the spotter planes.