aquiles7389

Lock the turret and steer only the ship...

Omaha and Cleveland are great! And i have to say I enjoyed pepsi. I think Balti is a brawler...I havent played it that much and still have mixed feelings about, but I have destroyed some dd's and lower tier cruisers with it... AA as escort is always a safe choice. You have like 1km for invisifire with proper upgrades (more with 5th skill captain), but the shell speed doesnt help too much...I have to say I enjoyed NO more than this and can only way for the 6s reload Des Moines. I will stay tuned to this tread as I need some advice as well...

"Publishing permission from Vadim in Minsk" So thats the guy that approves glimpses on new ships, and with that logic, the one that keeps the secrecy of ships being tested... Vadim, we want to see other ships in action!!! Some glimpses of the early testing of the ships would be nice (German bb line, tone, red crimea etc...) On the meantime, swear that I will hunt any vadim i find on wows o7

"Let's talk about Soviet battleships"...Not many, you can count them with a hand and have spare fingers.

WG, people is getting sick of your sh**

Looks nice, some japanese bombs impacts missing here and there but nice...

And also, if the feature to sell upgrades is considered, maybe you want to think about one to sell modules (Ship with 3 hulls, got C, and now I can sell B). Please???

Could you please, pretty please add a feature to sell upgrades? (The process of getting T1 ship, then sell and repeat is....annoying)

Godspeed Ectar!

There's an old legend in WOWS...Every time somebody mentions that navy the release date is postpones 1 month. You just did it.

Had some battles today, the guy "leading" the team had no [edited]idea of what he was doing...happened a lot whit this GNB stuff.

I remember not playing Ranked (Only 1 battle last season) because it took 4 minutes finding match, that stopped me to keep grinding. Also, the fact that there was no ship reward (only flags/credits/signals) made me stay away from the whole concept. Now, finally there's a ship, but only available to players with a long run on ranked battles... That's why I dont push WOT anymore, this very same kind of behaviour. Played around 10 matches last month. WG always finds a way to grind people's gears.

I missed the first week...my fault as I believed this was another shi*** WG contest. Now I will be around 100 diamonds from the smith (got the Katori already), but as it is impossible for me to get those diamonds in less than a week, I stopped playing the GNB missions. I guess many will be in the same boat as me, and that will be an issue for non reaching the 15 million mark...

1. HP pool is big, no need to scale it down. 2. Actually, small shells have lower chances to start a fire. 3. I really like that idea! BB's had dedicated crews to combat fires and for under-deck (engine room, flooding etc...) problems. I think splitting the repair crew in 2 (same cool-down times and everything), one for fires and the othe for flooding/engine/general would give a more comfortable sailing without affecting performance or making BB's OP.

Hi all. I want to let you know a small (and for some, might sound stupid) change in the paint of the Hiryu. I know that this patch brought a lot of pain to CV players for the fu**tons of AA improvements, and to be honest, I'm not a CV player (so I really don't mind that much) but the new deck with a metal plate instead of the Japanese Sun is just disappointing for me, I am not as devastated as the CV players but it is a little down. Did anybody else noticed this?

"Wow, what a nice fella" was the first thing that popped into my mind.

I have the diamonds now and I would like to spend them on this nice ship but... It has no armour, so it's a floating citadel. It can sail vs T5 ships. The guns have great range, but they are not precise, to say the least. I can deal the last 2, but the citadel issue actually worries me. It has the same armour as a DD, but then it came to me Does AP over-pen the Katori??? How are your experiences sailing this ship? Thanks.

There are 2 arms races... The Argentina-Chile one from (aroundish) 1890-1905. Those 2 Chilean pre-dreads were ordered in 1901, at the final stage, so there was a high chance of the Chilean government to sell them, and at the time, the Russian navy was acquiring lots of warships, because they were concerned (and quite right) about Japanese expansion, so the RN folks jumped to conclusions and never gave the ships to Chile. The other arm race is the Argentina-Brazil-Chile from 1920-1940. Amazing battleships there. (No pre-dreads so I will not go into them)

Which BB?

One of my fav youtubers. That Myoko....

I got 1 logged out by server, so I understand that, and played more than 6 later on, are those all the stats available?

Yes, so much of this!!!! A small angle avoids a citadel. I had 5 games.... Between 50k ad 120k damage (min and max yesterday night) Around 15 citadels per game (I remember a salvo with 5) 3 krakens 0 wins I logged out and had dinner.

Argentina had the only "Riverine Battleship Pre-Dreadnought" ever built. It was the ARA (Armada de la Republica Argentina) Independencia. Built by Cammell Laird back in 1890. It was built both for sea and river use (Buenos Aires is next to the Rio de la Plata estuary), mainly as Argentinian fluvial commerce was (and still is) very important by the time.

AC (Armada de Chile) Libertad, built by Vickers from 1901 to 1902. Ordered in the middle of the Chile-Argentina arms race...At 1902, the RN was a bit concerned about Chile's goverment selling these (Libertad had a sister, AC Constitucion) ships to the Russian Navy (the Japanese goverment raised the issue to the Marquess of Salisbury) and decided to buy both ships (still not finished and against Chile's will). The RN renamed them as Swiftsure class battleships. The Constitucion became HMS Swiftsure and the Libertad became HMS Triumph. The only Pre-Dreadnoughts Latin America ever had (Later on, Argentina, Brazil and Chile engaged in a huge arms race, but those were Dreadnoughts, so they dont fit here!). P.D. I'm not Chilenian, I'm Mexican but we the latinos feel quite close each other!