aquiles7389

Premium T7 BB will do...and I would love to see it tbh!

I would love these voices for British skippers: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhRUe-gz690 Thank you = "You are indeed brave, Sir knight" Affirmative = "So be it" Negative = "I move for no man" Requesting support = "Come 'ere" SOS = "Come on you pansy" That was a great battle = "You have proved yourself worthy" Good luck everyone = "I seek the finest and the bravest knights in the land to join me" $%*#@! = "Come back here and take what's coming to you. I'll bite your legs off" Change the annoying citadel sound to = "Tis but a scratch" or "Just a flesh wound" Also, change target penetrated/bullseye for = "The Black Knight always triumphs!" or "Then you shall die" Amazing idea right here folks...

Yeah, lets all keep our commentaries to ourselves, share nothing and avoid all this pointless discussions....kappa.I mean, forums are made to discuss, and if I'm wrong please correct me.

Nice vid, the sound is good and the gameplay is good. I'm not a youtuber so I cant tell you anything about it, biut usually what I like when people explain the ups and downs of any ship and show it on vid. Good luck!

This approach is useless, let me explain: 1. A lot of ships (I'm watching the soviet navy) never existed, so historically they are not accurate. 2. A lot of in-game features are enhaced or complitely ignored from the historical values. 3. WG has admitted that this is not an historically accurate game, being more arcade than historicall. Why do you want to stick to histroical values for some thing but others are completely obliterated by the developers imagination? I don't mind how historically correct stuff is, but how balanced....And IJN destroyers are in a terrible shape right now....

Well, to avoid this I stopped firing torps unless I am at the first line...Literally no friendly ships between the enemy and myself, and with that strategy not even a "friendly suicide" Khaba at full speed/speed flag/boast will be able to catch the torps, not even the slowest ones. Its been quite effective tbh...

Sorry, I forgot the not. I DONT support penalising, I mean, we barely make money now at T10, penalising will be the worst thing ever! But if rewards are offered, more players will be likely to pursue them.

I consider penalising not a good option, I mean, at high tiers you can barely make credits, most of the time you end up with less and less credits. Now, if WG rewards team play this will incentivate more players

Hi. Just researched the Shimakaze, and while browsing it I noticed the Type F3 torpedoes are not researched yet, even if I already researched them at the Kagero (are the ones I play with). Is this normal or just my account problem? Thanks

No problem at all pointing me ^^, at least you didn't insulted me like some forum users do. And about the survivability....it's because snipers and campers. I have most of my BBs with secondaries configuration, I like to charge and lead a push and I rely on my armour to do so, and in most of my matches I end up at the bottom of the sea. What I mean is that with this nerf, the BB players that charge and lead an attack will stop doing it as now the armour is less reliable...

Gain a little amount of xp or lose credits because my ships are more fragile (and thus, easier to sink).... I take the little amount of XP thank you.

"The armour thickness of regular Tier VIII-X battleships has been decreased. This change will allow penetration of the affected ships in the forward section with large-calibre AP shells." Well....time to stop being agressive and start to fire from the background and be passive... GG WG

Will be at the office at the time, so I will not participate in your giveaway, but it's very nice from you to do this kind of things. Happy b-day!

I never torp unless I'm in the front line...It's a bit shi*** as I had lost many great chances to kill enemies but I don't do what I dont lake people to do to me (even if they do from time to time and rant about how I "ran" into their torps...damm a*holes).

Where is the Die-Hard badge?!?!?No Die-Hard means you are not an overly manly macho man...Just a macho man

Thanks for letting me know. I'm glad is not my account but it's damm sad to know there are no common modules....

1. You are right, this is a discussion based on an early leak, no evidence the changes will remain as they are now. With that as a background, we are just writing what we think/feel about said changes...We are not talking about anything else. People can say anything they want and actually that might even help the developers by giving them a clue about how unpopular this change will be if released. After all, forums are to discuss the game...Now is time to say what we think about what we know about the changes, discussing a constructive way comes later when official changes are announced. 2. All hysterical....Yeah, I destroyed my computer in rage and jumped from the window of my building...Dude, I don't think "hysterical" people put emojis on their comments. 3. Constructive discussion about possible effects...Why bother??? The changes are not even official yet. We are just saying what we think about them from the thing we know, that's all. 4. Calling another forum user's comment crap is not nice dude. That only displays poor response skill from a limited mind. After all, this is an open forum where people can say what they think as long as they respect other people comments (like you didn't). I'm sure a "constructive" discussion will take place when an official statement will be announced, on the meantime the only thing that we can do is to share our own opinion (maybe even the developers might read them and change their minds). 5. And lastly, if you disagree with somebody's opinion, you are not obligated to answer (keep scrolling maybe?), and even less insulting the other person. Hope I helped you being a better forum user

Basically HE without fire...utterly disgusting. Somehow I knew WG would stop the so far good job and find a way to rekt the RN line (postponed for sooooo long), we can manage the low armour, or the poor shell arc/speed, but this is just silly (to say the least). We can not have a decent RN line because....reasons.(ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻ Also, I trained the RN skipper to spam HE and then this happens.... Y U DO DIS WG ლ(ಠ益ಠლ)

Nice vids pal. Keep the good job

Manners Maketh Man its not about not making damage... I spent 14 games with no damage to allies and never got it, then in the 15th game I rammed somebody so the consecutive games was lost. The next game we won (no capping) and I pressed the gg key (F9) at the end and I got it.

Ahhhh causing flooding damage without torps...thats manly. Put some more hair on yer chest and survive to get the Die-Hard badge, the manliest overly manly badge of them all. And as a manly man remember: Where we go, we dont need torps!

EG [WG employee, I omitted the name] 6 September 2016 09:19Hello aquiles7389, Thanks for getting in touch with Wargaming Customer Service. I am really sorry for the inconvenience that might be caused by the issue, Captain. Unfortunately, due to a technical issue, the system cannot grant the captain if the account has already had the Campbeltown. The issue has been already forwarded to Devs Team and will be fixed as soon as possible. Once the error is fixed, you will be informed via your ticket. Thanks for your understanding and the patience in advance. Best regards, EG [same WG bob] Wargaming.net Customer Service Representative So, It's getting fixed (I submitted the ticket on Saturday, so I guess there a lot of tickets right now) No...Plox read previous posts, people had to sell the Campby before completing the mission in order to get the captain.

Good they fixed it for the people that are finishing or will finish the mission. For the ones that finished on the weekend (Sat for me) looks that it's still missing (the 12 point captain)...

I think you meant picric acid. Also, I think it was not the acid but the ammonium salt (ammonium picrate), which is called Dunnite. A British/American legacy to the IJN iirc...