aquiles7389

Beta Tester
  • Content count

    372
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    5555

1 Follower

About aquiles7389

  • Rank
    Petty Officer
  • Birthday
  • Portal profile aquiles7389

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Mexican Pacific Fleet
  • Portal profile aquiles7389

Recent Profile Visitors

502 profile views
  1. You, I like your idea...But most of the time punishment never works and only make people flood the forums with complains.... I like your idea even more.
  2. Like in WoT....after X number of battles without torp damage to your allies you get a ribbon/medal. And maybe after X number of ribbons/medals you get some cammos/doubloons/xp/something as reward.
  3. Hi. I've been playing low tiers a little bit more lately due to the "Spoils of the Revolution" mission...But I found that I've been torped more by allies than by enemies. I can make my way to avoid enemy torps by using WASD hack, but FFS allies firing their torps not giving a flying fu*k and turning pink it's very common!...And of course they will always come with the "You jumped into my torpedoes" retard argument...(yeah, me on my big slow bb charging towards the enemy....). Explaining them that they should not fire torps when there are allies nerby is harder than teaching Nuclear physics to a Kindergarden kid. Penalties are harsh and accidents may happen....Why not reward the fact of actually aiming where are the low tier dds aiming their torps?
  4. WG EU giving special treatment to collectors just as in other servers?? No way....this is EU server, we dont have such things
  5. As you quoted my comment instead of the one from the guy who thinks Emerald is OP, I tought you were another OP Emerald believer... And yeah, "I'd go ahead and ask your mother for a refund on your brain, it's clearly malfunctioning" its quite a personal attack, thus ad hominem....But as you clarified that your comment went to the people that think that Emerald is OP, then I have no problem and actually agree. Carry on good Sir.
  6. Wow...ad hominem offending other players without reason....very mature from you (It's sarcasm, I can see you are a bit slow) BTW....stats show Emerald as the second worse (Win Rate) T5 cruiser...and the WORST damge of all the T5 cruisers... There you go kid....cold hard numbers. And keep your forum picture...It suits you.
  7. "the Tier 5 ship that has ROLF stomped every thing it could possibly meet is finally getting a nerf - I'm talking about H.M.S. Emerald of course!" I'm trying really, really, really hard to find the sarcasm in your post...Can't tell if you are sarcasm master troll or if you actually (HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA LOL) think that HMS Riverstone Emerald is OP.....Either case:
  8. Dou you think thats B8?!?!?!?!
  9. Thats why I will start playing the Conqueror and then make my way down the line.
  10. My last one was in February....and only 4 in total (since the container thing started) RNGesus hates me.
  11. Your solution doesn't work....I still have the 40 Gb folder.... The NA client one is around 20, so no....its not my PC.
  12. If I had a penny for every time WG doesnt stick to his own word...
  13. I love the 420mm and the sheer amount of damage....After all, 3 secs is not that much!
  14. Hi all. As the title says, which gun will you be using on the HMS Conqueror?? As far as I remember, the 457mm gun has a sigma value of 2.0 and the 419mm has 1.8...Beside the sigma and the fire chance of HE shells, Is there another advantage of 457mm guns??? Thanks
  15. Monty got really good after the citadel was lowered, and if you add an amazing AA suit, and the fact that packs a big punch (Both Conqueror and Monty will delete broadside cruisers, but Conqueror will suffer against BB's...Monty doesnt!) I went with Monty.