JapLance

Murmansk is worth it at normal price, at 50% is a no-brainer.

I may retake my account in the NA server. Only played like 5 battles there, just to check if it was good enough lag-wise.

I'm sure you are a great businessman .

Yep, noticed that too this evening. Easy to see now with the new hit ribbons.

I've had this evening penetrating hits with AP registering 0 damage. Up to now there was no way to know that, but now with the new ribbons separating hits by penetrating, non penetrating, ricochets and overpenetrations is easy to see.

Up to 0.5.7 the maximum number of BBs in a game was 4 per side. Now I've seen 5 in the same team, which is NOT an improvement, specially for the poor guys playing in cruisers.

These are my thoughts as well. But WG could have used Atlanta in tier 6 for the US line instead of the shoehorned Cleveland, and they didn't probably because of the extremely different play style of an AA cruiser vs anything else. I suspect this (a mistake in my opinion) could be repeated with the Didos in the British line. I'd like to see HMS Argonaut. Love that name

Not sure why most comments in this thread aim at a 5 for "average". That would be true if there were as many good players as bad ones, but we all know it's not like this. I'd say the average is a 4 or a 3.

I think it can be considered official by now: Gremyaschy will never make it into the shop again.

Isn't it ironic that the new black citadel hit ribbon has a destroyer profile in it?

No. You just saw what happens in WG every day. People that did this pic has no idea of what a Yubari is or how does it look like. People that added the pic to the shop has even less idea of how the Yubari they sell should look like. Just deal with it. WoWs is a second/third rate game for WG. This would never happen with a tank. Not even with a completely made up one.

1 year ago I got 3000 doubloons from ShipComrade that served me to get a Murmansk which gave me tons of fun through this year. Glad to see that the website lift off and sails full steam into the next years. Good luck everybody in the giveaway.

OK. Can you put 2 more screenshots like that with Yubari?

I don't have Sims, but can tell about Yubari, and it's not worth the 10€ they want for it.

Indeed it was probably the cruiser that suffered most from the captain skills changes a few months ago, but it's still a good ship.

A great tool. Thanks a lot.

I'd say that option for NC was already there before today's patch.

I've noticed this as well. 2 out of every 3 of my games in the last weeks are in tier7, where the 13Km range is worth nothing. My average damage with Furutaka prior to the new C hull introduction was 30k. When the new hull was added I bought the ship again and played it, with my average damage going up to 40k for the first days/weeks according to WarshipToday. I really liked the ship. Most games were tier5 or tier 6. But lately, after a number of disastrous games in tier7 all the time, I just checked again and the damage average had gone down to 32k. Not worth it in my opinion.

Cap points are fine. You had a bad day full of tomatoes. Go eat a yogurt. And do 4x 20 series push ups.

It's a good idea, but... Unfortunately, with the proposed system 70-80% of the players would NEVER leave the bottom ranks, get bored and stop playing. The players that advance would soon get very poor queue times due to the lack of players, and mode would die in a few days. Doable in a game like WoT with a large number of players, but not in WoWs, in my opinion.

There's a bug in post-battle screen that may tell you that you have done the mission when you're actually at about 99.x% of completion. Seems like the game rounds up and considers it 100% done, when it's not. It happened to me with the 3000 hits to get ARP Haguro. I finished a battle, and got the "mission completed" in post battle briefing, but there was no ship in port. I went into missions folder and I had like 2985 hits... so the mission was not really completed. I had to play again to finish it.

This is the typical example of a ship that I would never buy before having tried it first. It is sold as a slightly better Pensacola, and certainly has some features that are better than Pensa, like the reduced detectability (which is atrocious in the regular ship). But one of the things that make Pensacola playable for me (I really like it) is the wonderful maneuverability that allowed me to dodge a lot of shells, and seems like Indianapolis is worse in this department. How much worse? I'd need to have a test and check if the lesser agility is still allowing me to dodge shells like in Pensacola.

I had no complains about AP on Königsberg and Nürnberg, and used it seldom with Yorck (but hits like a truck when close enough). But when I reached Hipper I expected a lot more from AP ammo. I'm having less average damage caused in Hipper than I have in Yorck, and I could swear its due to AP ammo being poor, which could be OK if it wasn't for everybody praising Hipper for its AP. To be honest, I'm very disappointed with Hipper, because it also maneuvers like a rheumatic elder.

Really? Are you comparing the regular BBs that all potato players can use to a Beta player exclusive ship and one of the most OP ships at its tier of the whole game?

That's cruiser turret turn speed.. I can smell two letters incoming... The first one is O, guess the other.