-
Content Сount
1,694 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
3784
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by puxflacet
-
[12.6] Simply Grey Paint + Historical camouflage v.1
puxflacet replied to Lutjens41's topic in Visual Mods
I guess your right... That happened? 😄 And it used to be such a problem... I lost a track -
[12.6] Simply Grey Paint + Historical camouflage v.1
puxflacet replied to Lutjens41's topic in Visual Mods
This is total quality stuff! Didn't you think about combining your forces with TheKingofUm a maybe put your two mods together and spare us the dilemma which one to install? :D -
Hey King, this mod is total lifesaver. However, not trying to disrespect Wawan, but I would recommend updating the very first post and display there the most recent eyecandy stuff. That post is the show window of the mod after all. Cheers.
-
Hello fellows. New dreadnought game on the horizon. Take a peak... https://www.dreadnoughts.ultimateadmiral.com/ Search on YouTube for a gameplay videos.
- 332 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- dreadnought
- jutland
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
the secondaries are the only buff german BBs really need. forget the main guns. secondaries was suppose to be their thing, while now every other BB has secondary build. germans have armor + hydro which screams "get close" ,but when you get there, you'll find out that you really dont have that much in your sleeve to win a fight...WG should definitely come up with someting which makes german secondaries viable again... please no...
-
kinda agree...except for the GC comparison. T6 is where GC belongs and testing clearily showed that. VU certainly wasn't as strong at T4 as GC is at T5.
-
No, there is no trade. SAP does more damage all the time. Why switching to AP when even SAP is even able to citadel things(?) (if Im not mistaken I even saw that Venezia citadelled other cruiser with SAP, thats just ridiculous). The long reload just asks for this question: should i go with guarantee damage or switch to even bigger alpha strike? But currently the AP doesnt offer that choice EDIT: that SAP citadel had to be a bug
-
definitely agree that AP has to do more damage than SAP otherwise there is literally no point to have it. citadels itself cant compesate the fact that it has way worse bounce angles and can even overpen.
-
so 31 knots...why am I not surprised https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_K-class_submarine
-
Cruisers and CVs mostly too...
-
and cruisers and CVs...and even more for the DDs because they are the only class which was equipped to fight them, so another task for already overloaded class. (Unless WG gives depth charges to battleships ofc) I can see the chat already "why arent you capping? why arent you spotting? why arent you screening DDs? why arent you hunting subs? why are you dead already?" The old stupid song that subs will somehow fix camping BBs...get a grip
-
Proves that not a single statement of WG has any value.
-
ST, Italian cruisers tier VIII-X and Genova, tier V
puxflacet replied to _Weikath_'s topic in Development Blog
I didn't get that name change at all. "France" is such an elegant name and many war/ships had it... -
I really don't like T3. It is quite unprecedented to have a captured/seized ship as tech tree one. Didn't italians had anything that would fit in that tier? I would definitely prefer even paper design over captured ship.
-
Ok then. I was simply pointing towards the fact you are seeking only nicknames for a fail ship...which doesn't seem the be Siegfried's case.
-
huh?
-
really? not what i saw...
-
"Boring sea" you say? The old Islands of ice definitely had more character than the current ones. And imho it was the most beautiful map in the game. Wish WG found a way to save it.
-
Addressing bugs that have been in the game since day1
puxflacet replied to Yankmyplank's topic in General Discussion
Just to be sure...you know there is a cooldown on the consumable, right? -
Frankly I would rather want to see german ship with 4x2 layout than american. And 4x2 450mm would imho feel more right than current GK's layout...
-
well, my point was like: if italian BBs' gimmick is suppose to be AP and semi-AP, there should be something what makes it worth it, because british BBs can say: "hey, we already have semi-AP shell, and it can even start a fire"
-
My thoughts exactly...and how relevant this shell actually will be (assuming it is intended for italian BBs) when british BBs' HE is basicaly already semiAP shell with fire starting ability on top
-
yeah. then he says it is neither bad or good
-
Really? The situation he describes is open to debate whether it is good or bad? Are you serious? Is there any freaking weirdo who considers that being good? Like seriously this kind of thinking gives me creeps
