puxflacet
-
Content Сount
1,694 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
3784
Everything posted by puxflacet
-
they just need proper animation to have really any meaning, because i think of them as immersion feature. but without the spectacle they are just annoying feature...however they should be in the game for sure
-
Ramming - the stupidest mechanic in the game
puxflacet replied to ajb13's topic in General Discussion
there is nothing stupid about detonations, there is actually no mechanic involved i would say...they just need proper animation to have really any meaning, because i think of them as immersion feature. but without the spectacle they are just annoying feature -
yay. buff for my albany edit: and for mikasa's fireworks too?...yum yum
-
Ramming - the stupidest mechanic in the game
puxflacet replied to ajb13's topic in General Discussion
i was saying this right from the beginning...ramming mechanics really makes no sense. especially this: two ships scraping their hulls -> big boom -
xxx
-
grammar correction: french cruisers were leaking
-
bah. stats. who cares...its italian! italian ships are there for their look not performance
-
no way...italians...hype
-
when one side manages to concentrate firepower on critical points more effectively (intentionally or not) the things will resolve pretty decidedly no matter what...i wouldnt blame mm
-
and i would forget the main news...majorkoenig you have to update the list once again: stock FUSO - gone stock COLORADO - gone stock NEW MEXICO - gone
-
sorry. i just dropped by few mins ago...will not pretend that i read all the pages
-
and you sir are...?
-
please visit these threads and strenghten our ranks! BB's stock hulls initiave Dreadnought Era Appreciation Thread
-
btw, prepare to be dazzled cruiser Gloire (La Galissonniére class) in 1944:
-
yeah. i meant cruisers...and katori is an oddity indeed
-
i agree. now i think that the friant will be the youngest design on tier 3, right? with its ahead-time gun layout it will look even more out of place
-
yeah. im not used to twin turrets for lower caliber guns so early. some other member wrote that friant is project 171 from 1919. so with duguay-trouin from 1922, it seems to me that french came up with the most modern gun layout on a light cruiser to that date. i had no idea edit: now i realize omaha had twin turrets too...but her layout doesnt look as modern as this. still i would prefer something more antique on t3. i think that the friant will be the youngest design on tier 3, right? with her ahead-time gun layout she will look even more out of place
-
well, duguay-trouin is from 1922 with same layout. i think it is the most modern gun layout to that date
-
ah...strange. its because im not used to twin turrets for lower caliber guns so early. wasnt the french the first one who designed them on light cruiser? edit: now i realize omaha had them too...but her layout doesnt look as modern as this
-
lets talk the french: another nail into dreadnaught coffin? friant looks way too modern for tier 3 imho. like 1930s. anyone knows what is this ship? definitely not the protected cruiser from 1893 EDIT: my ignorance...it seems that french didnt built light cruiser between 1899 and 1923...i had no idea. so the friant is probably some paper design
-
friant looks way too modern for tier 3 imho...anyone knows what is this ship? definitely not the protected cruiser from 1893 EDIT: my bad. i had no idea that french didnt built a light cruiser between 1899 and 1923. so friant is some paper design
-
ehm...ships are SHE
-
another minor detail i noticed is that mutsu's bow shape is a bit different than the nagatos...wiki says that their bows were elongated in 1927-30, however in game mutsu's bow is still bent a bit
-
youre right. nikolai is missing on the list...as well as novik, bogatyr, svietlana, diana and aurora
-
one of the most beautiful beasts ever afloat meet
- 332 replies
-
- 4
-
-
- dreadnought
- jutland
- (and 4 more)