puxflacet
-
Content Сount
1,694 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
3784
Everything posted by puxflacet
-
ok. so the very same thing arrived with british battleships as well...this is second hull for iron duke in this case the solution is pretty simple since the platform is very convenient. just lift that a bit higher and visibility wont be obstructed edit: it seems that they made this platform so that the holes for optical devices on top of the turrets wouldnt be obstructed but they didnt take into account the bridge behind. edit2: orion has the same problem while in his case navigation bridge has clear view. only view from conning tower is blocked and again this can be easily fixed
-
nvm
-
im confused. can someone sum up for me the recent state of bb tree from tier 7? ...with stating that "nelson didnt go anywhere" you mean literally anywhere? like she wont be in the tech tree?
-
The Hipper is an unmitigated disaster and needs huge buffs
puxflacet replied to Pocktio's topic in Cruisers
what about alternative hull option like mogami has. initial designs for hipper's sisters seydlitz and lützow were to mount on them four triple 150mm turrets (the ones on nurnberg) she definitelly wouldnt have problem with rate of fire... with atlantic bow... -
REQUEST for Premium Ships (wishlist)
puxflacet replied to 1MajorKoenig's topic in General Discussion
i would like to see kms seydlitz as designed as light cruiser 4x3 150mm - nurnbergs machineguns on hipper's hull: so tier 8 ...or eventually would be interesting to give this hull option simply to the hipper. same thing as with mogami. because im more fan of hull configurations which offers you some variations, rather than they are just worse version which you have to grind through to make your ship viable pre-war refit with sexy antlatic bow, funnel cap etc. however both seydlitz and lützow are not the best picks for the name because of the more famous ww1 battlecruisers which honestly deserve to be in the game more than this one...the more im thinking about it, the more i like the "alternative hipper hull" solution rather than premium -
yeah. its called "compass platform" or "flying bridge"... the thing is the superstructure doesnt reflect the sudden object put in front of it - in this case huge rangefinders. it seems to me that they modeled the hulls without completelly know which additional equipment would be fitted on B and C hull and on the last second they just randomly put stuff on it to look upgraded. there are windows facing steel wall (and even modelled optical devices behind them). if the rangefinders have to be there they should rebuild the superstrusture and lift the navigation bridge higher. this just look like the ship set sail in the middle of refitting when everything was done except the main superstructure.
-
but you cant have blocked sight fron navigation bridge even if steering wheel is somewhere else. in bertin's case they are literally unable to navigate the ship because they do not see whats in front of them
-
i like them pixelated
-
im pretty sure. the steering wheel is even visible on the models if you check gamemodels3d.com...the windows above are from so-called "admiral's bridge" where were officers usually during the battle to have better view
-
můžete prosím opravit tuhle blbost? nebo chcete abychom věřili že francouzští kormidelníci vidí skrz ocel? jestli chcete mermomocí aby bertin ten bofors měl tak ho dejte na conning tower, kde sice pořád bude zaclánět pár navigačním přístrojům, ale pořád je to lepší než tohle
-
fakt nechápu proč má mít 30 000 tunovej křižník 43 uzlů. totální nesmysl. tahle loď by i s přetíženýma bojlerama v reálu dosáhla stěží 38 uzlů a to by posádka musela vyhodit všechny předměty, které by unesla přes palubu a pak sama skočit do vody. a ta loď to podle mě vůbec nepotřebuje. jen posíláte realismus zbytečně ke dnu...a ano toto není simulátor - ale já jsem schopný pochopit arkádové prvky které slouží nějakému účelu - hru zrychlují, zjednodušují, dělají zajímavější...ale tohle jí jenom kazí celkem dokonalá ukázka power creepu: protože už jsou extrémně rychlé křižníky ve hře (rusáci a japonci) tak je musíte trumfnout jedině něčím co popluje totálně nesmyslnou rychlostí. italské křižníky nakonec skončí v očích hráčůch jako pomalé lodě
-
nemohl by wg vrátit eugenu původní skin? já chápu že spousta lidí měla kecy a když už je eugen tak průměrný, nemastný, neslaný tak tenhle skin asi sales department pořádně vyděsil, ale dát ho jako druhou volbu ke stávající baltické kamufláži nikomu neublíží. podle mě je eugen jedna z lodí, kterým čisté linie hodně sluší. řekl bych jedna z nejelegantnějších lodí ve hře a tahle kamufláž je pro ní úplně jako smoking
-
Battleships should earn 0 XP and credits for CA kills
puxflacet replied to G01ngToxicCommand0's topic in General Discussion
yeah. but the way you said that suggest that you can mean it both game-wise or irl i just sometimes come across people who really think that cruisers were meant to set battleships on fire and destroyers were meant to counter battleships with sneaky torpedo runs -
Battleships should earn 0 XP and credits for CA kills
puxflacet replied to G01ngToxicCommand0's topic in General Discussion
why? you can figure it out, cant you? but battleships were built to counter other battleships. battlecruiser were built to counter cruisers, or armored cruisers to counter protected cruisers. this was about managing resources. battleship is an overkill for a cruiser. you dont need it to counter cruiser, not to mention that every cruiser captain would avoid fight with battleship unless there would be no other option rock&paper&scissors has no basis in real life. the smaller the ship the more of them you can build and control bigger area, so destroyers will be send for various support tasks, cruisers will hunt enemy commerce and battleships will fight other battleships. thats the real reason why there were ship classes -
Battleships should earn 0 XP and credits for CA kills
puxflacet replied to G01ngToxicCommand0's topic in General Discussion
no it isnt -
definitely. im not saying that look is everything. thats why i will not buy her unless shell be on 50% sale. im quite surprised that they didnt make the offer already. i can imagine that eugen's sale arent anything amazing. i dont think that 30% will make them much better - but thats just my impression
-
she has also better looking bow shape than hipper. funnel shape is more elegant...hipper somewhat looks a bit more bulky than eugen. eugen is like more slim chic brother for me eugen is just about the look i also wish she still have the option to mount the monochromatic naval grey skin...why is wargaming afraid of these? some ships look soo good in plain simple color without that excessive rust
-
i would actually buy her just because i love her look. elegant ship, one of the most beautiful imho...but the ship itself isnt worth the price imho. and not even 30% discount is enough for me. 50% would be insta buy though.
-
firstly, combining carrier+gun ship playstyle will never work. secondly, these planes were not a big deal anyway. afaik ise's bombers werent floatplanes so werent even able to return. only solution for these planes is imho make them consumable like ctrl + click autonavigated but still you will have to do the job mainly with your guns. tone will be completelly ok for that. ise not so much i am afraid yeah. thats also good idea. aa support ship is ideal role for both tone and ise
-
24 hours chatban for certain amount of m-i-c reports is certainly thumb up from me
-
Time to fix the German Low Tier BBs (after a year)
puxflacet replied to 1MajorKoenig's topic in General Discussion
you obviously didnt get what this discussion is all about. show me any ship in 1900-1920 configuration beyond tier 4 -
Time to fix the German Low Tier BBs (after a year)
puxflacet replied to 1MajorKoenig's topic in General Discussion
dont forget that because of the squeezed space tiers 3 and 4 have matchmaking rule +1 tier only. this wouldnt be needed if there would be 2 more tiers so actually more people would be allowed to join a battle -
Time to fix the German Low Tier BBs (after a year)
puxflacet replied to 1MajorKoenig's topic in General Discussion
not just germans. only americans and japanse doesnt have this issue as prominent because they didnt built much ships before ww1, but every other nation will have to deal with this to some degree as well. and every nation has a battleship gap from ww1 to ww2. but i would rather bridge this gap with never-builts rather than take real and iconic ships and turn them into something beyond recognition. ...i am just passionate person. now you mind waiting time when you were proposing separate mode. guess which one would have longer wating time and what do you mean by this? i would love to volunteer actually...also new ships are added on regular basis, thats the essence of this game, so where is problem? -
yeah. and the most drastic example of all: the only thing these two ships have in common is the name stated on their stern
-
Time to fix the German Low Tier BBs (after a year)
puxflacet replied to 1MajorKoenig's topic in General Discussion
it is strange to find myself, op and many others in position that we are treated like some weirdos who are just pushing their favorite nerdy ships and according to everyone else, everything in low tiers is ok. i cant help myself, but you must have zero knowledge about naval history, otherwise i cant imagine that you think that there is no problem in low tiers. 1900 - 1920 is most dynamic period in naval history: there were born pre-dreadnoughts, semi-dreadnoughts, dreadnoughts, superdreadnoughts, armored cruisers, battlecruisers, aircraft carriers, etc...and we have just 2 tiers to cover these turbulent times and for 1920-1950 we have 7 tiers while even less ships were laid down during this period. some even says "this isnt age of dreadnoughts game" but we have them in the game already and it wasnt my decision to include them. if youd ask me, i would rather have either ww1 or ww2 focused game but wg decided that they want to please everyone. ok then, but make it right! and not the way that the low tiers are just some misconcepted curiosity which should be quickly race through and never come back adding just two tiers more down there would be the most feasible way to fix this. nothing would change up from current tier 4 and low tiers would finally have smooth and natural evolution. gosh i even remember when saint louis was meeting fully refitted kongo - there is like 40 years between those two ships. you find nothing like that in high tiers- 47 replies
-
- 2
-
-
- german
- battleship
- (and 3 more)