Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

puxflacet

Players
  • Content Сount

    1,694
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    3784

Everything posted by puxflacet

  1. puxflacet

    Never seen a Super-Container since update ....

    i havent seen one like in year
  2. and will she be premium?
  3. its not a stock amagi guys, different ship ...her bow really doesnt look very japanese, but i must admit that i like it
  4. puxflacet

    Remove detonations please

    i agree that current form of it is pretty lame but i think that det mechanic needs just some rework like: - dice roll for detonation can occur only when magazine area is penetrated with ap or hit by torpedo or ap bomb (not engine compartment (and certainly anything else)) - this would even give new meaning to shooting under the turrets when brawling - maybe it should occur only if ship has certain percentage of hp, like max 50% - and certainly it needs proper animation, because without the spectacle it really doesnt have any meaning to be in the game but detonations belongs to warships as water and explosives so it should be in the game in some form
  5. puxflacet

    New ship Preview: Kii (Japan)

    so this isnt the promised premium amagi's removed stock hull? so what is it? premium or regular? i would love to see amagi's old stock hull at tier 7 as well. and wait...do i see torpedo launcher? btw she loos nice indeed.
  6. puxflacet

    Do you want to wake the dragon?

    fu-shun is really nice looking ship... however, i dont think that this tree is a good idea because with introducing these ships you will just diminished the possibility to introduce these ships in tree branches of their original country...and it looks really messy
  7. puxflacet

    Realistic Camouflage

    +1 i know what you mean. however the colors are not the main issue. the way regular/non-premium camos are done is basically wrong because these texture are tiled. thats the main reason why these will never look like a proper naval camo check this thread:
  8. puxflacet

    What should be future steps of WG?

    every nation has this gap in bbs because of naval treaties in 1920s and 30s...if youd ask me thats the place where to put paper projects
  9. puxflacet

    What should be future steps of WG?

    they have protective matchmaking because tier 2-4 has to cover 20 years of naval development. the difference between each tier is way more drastical there than in high tiers. i remember times when st. louis was meeting fully refitted kongo...at least in this case wg has enough judgment to recognize this issue
  10. puxflacet

    What should be future steps of WG?

    what exactly do you mean?
  11. puxflacet

    What should be future steps of WG?

    whats wrong with matchmaking? you want completely mirrored teams?
  12. puxflacet

    i'm so in love right now

    i had never really remarkable game with her although i feel her potential...shes also pretty good looking
  13. puxflacet

    Ships with fastest shells

    i believe scharnhorst's shells are fastest among bb
  14. you dont know anything about the implementation. there has to be some factors to balance this like longer lasting smoke and longer time for smoke generators...i was just saying that its worth testing...and you came with all this overreacted BBphobia. frankly, it annoys me
  15. was that stated? i was looking at this from the beginning as attempt to bring a new mechanic to the game which opens up new options and not just something which has to nerf certain ships
  16. cruisers should play defensively when they facing bb just as dd should when facing cruiser ...and again i was never talking about "smoke meta"
  17. most cruisers dont have smoke...i have bolded it for you as well
  18. i dont know. no "smoke meta" was ever my argument
  19. what a nonsense fabrication...only few cruisers have smoke. how are the ones without it able to survive in the game then?
  20. puxflacet

    Damnkurque this camo is fugly :o

    same cathegory as eugen's "russian neonazi motoclub" big stupid chicken...i hope there is option to disable this
  21. and you still seem to forget that without shooting you still will able to use the smoke as up to now and you can lay semi-circle to prevent spotting from multiple angles...however i think that ships will need a bit longer duration for laying the screen to compensate as i said. this change has interesting potential and its worth at least testing
  22. the intention has its appeal - you will be able to use the smoke defensively as up to now, you also will still be able to lay a long line to cover your fleet...but there will be penalty for sitting in smoke and shooting
  23. are you even able to make a post without that word?
  24. which just means that smoke will be more useful for other ships rather than just for yourself...wasnt the op complaining about lack of teamplay?
  25. it rather seems like more need of ahead thinking for smoke usage. so rather than firing from inside the smoke you will fire behind the smoke so will have to be aware of positioning of enemy ships. i think it may bring some interesting options
×