puxflacet

when WG is able to present this↓ as historical skin, im afraid your only option is to mod really i would recommend everyone to visit mod section, there are already plenty of threads for camo adjustments/removal (mine included). the best way right now is sadly "do it by yourself"

Some rust-free monochromatic paint jobs would be definitely cool. Shame that WG is so afraid to intruduce them. People were too bitchy about Tashkent and Prinz Eugen

is this real thing? facepalm. russian aesthetics strikes again...just give me the option to turn it off and im fine i met freedomcamoed ship recently in a match and was unpleasantly surprised that the thing cant be turned off in the port. im modding nearly every camo in the game right now, because i just cant stand most of them. except of majority of premium camos, but these are mostly historical, thats why they look good...hsf camos look also good, subtle and elegant (even the kitty harekaze) i wish they finally do something about regular camos, because they are just wrong from the very basics

i would say that 203 are not really heavy cruiser guns anymore at t10, especially thanks to des moines. these super cruisers are the real CA of the high tiers. they just wouldnt fit any other role edit: ...or did you mean just "cruisers" by CA? calling that overreacting would be an understatement

1MajorKoenig wants, 1MajorKoenig gets

Well thats what im talking about. What did they remove on Cossack?

I thought that gun angles are determined by nearest obstacle...

Cossacks gun angles has been buffed? I wonder how can you adjust gun angles on a real design? Move the guns forward?

Yeah. Unfortunately this game really makes an impression that it actually starts at tier 6.

me making wild claims? you are the one who is talking about catastrophic damage and claiming that ship werent able to hold leaks from torpedos... what what?

can you name at least one other ship except for bismarck which was damaged on sea? titanic doesnt count

what?

lolyep. you would be probably surprised how many damage can be fixed on sea and the ones which can not are obviously represented with depleted health pool. the game doesnt really specific the damage so can get away with that where the game obviously isnt realistic is that damage isnt affecting your speed, accuracy, rate of fire, listing...

When talking about realism people tend to forget nr.1 rule of this game -> evverything is speed up (except reload times etc) Naval battles also didnt take just 20 min but hours. So not really a magic button but speed up damage control party

Premium ships bots in training room...i would like to test my weapons on these too as well as recreate some historical/hypothetical encounters with proper ships, as i sometimes do for recreational purposes ;)

You probably wont believe this, but even I didnt suppose that you were proposing anything such ridiculous as put Alaska alongside South Carolina...I meant "lower tiers" ofc, but just mistype that.

You were saying that she should be low tier BB. Im still against that, but more importantly it can not be done. "Act as low tier BB"? What that suppose to mean...no. We are not on the same page at all. I only said: give them BB matchmaking if necessary

Yeah. If the only concern is MM, then label them CB and give them BB matchmaking

Shes more cruiser than BB from whatever point of view you choose to look at.

which buffed BB stats? she has no BB stats except those guns and try to balance them at low tier: either those guns will be there OK against BBs but nightmare against those fragile low tier cruisers, or balanced against cruisers and garbage against other BBs. Those guns just cant work there. stop imagine that Alaska is US Scharnhorst. Shes not. She has no armor, nor secondaries, nor torpedos...or maybe imagine Alaska as Scharnhost - imagine you are in Scharnhorst and have only those guns... You will just never make her behave like a BB, you would have to turn her upside down and make completelly different ship. The only thing you can balance are those guns. And she still will have to run from even mid tier battleships. Shes just not BB. To make her high tier long-range-heavy-punching-glass-cannon is just the only possible solution. And I dont get why Alaska as high tier cruiser would be some disaster for the game balance. Did Kronshadt destroy the game or what? Why are people so freaked up? Because of some youtube videos of Stalingrad?

Alaska as mid tier BB is nonsense. Shes not Scharnhost. She is not even BB, not even close. High tier cruiser is the only possible solution

forum feature request: "useless comment" tag

Has nothing to do with laziness. It can be just collected in your last battle you played that day, in which you died early. Certainly i wont be waiting for the results because of one container. Happening to me a lot so definitely welcomed feature

looks way better than with what WG came up