-
Content Сount
4,705 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
17888 -
Clan
[THESO]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by Excavatus
-
yeah.. as a CV player in ranked.. I have to agree.. this is so easy it is not even fun.. You just need 1 or 2 teammates with a brain to stay alive long enough for you to win the game :)
-
yeah, basically.. being in an abusive relationship :) Ofcourse, I'm not happy %100 about everything, I have my own complains, ideas to improve.. but in general I'm happy with the game.. and I'm certainly not thinking, "WG is basically Umbrella Corp. Lying through their teeth, do not believe 1 word they say, and they they do anything and everything just to make people spend more money! - May god burn them in hell!" Yeah, I'm not one of those folk :) those are the one I don't understand why they are still here
-
I know... everyone says Lexy is better than saipan.. I don't disagree.. on paper.. but I don't know why.. I'm better in saipan :) I'm weird :) I find RN smoke is easier to deal with than the kidd... Both needs to have a captain with a working brain though :) Let me say, they are equally frustrating to deal with.. and Kidd AA is actually not bad for a tier 8 DD.. better than the RN DDs..
-
here.. corrected it for you
-
I'll take out my saipan for a ride in ranked tonight :) because you know, having tier 10 planes in a match where only tier 8s present.. is so much fun :) Fun aside, If you wanna play a DD @Tracen the only viable choice looks like a full AA specced kidd... That thing with extremely long smoke, heavy AA and a Heal.. I usually don't go after it 2nd time If I find out that the player has a working brain.. Wasting time on a kidd usually makes you lose precious time and damage on other ships around.. If you are really insisting on taking a DD in ranked.. Take Kidd.. nothing else have a better chance.. some of them has none :)
-
The problem is, some people, they don't believe anything "The Man" says.. which is WG here.. They believe the company will lie about anything and everything at everytime... because... reasons.. the only point I really cannot understand... since your life cannot depend on a video game.. Why would you stick around in forums and in game every day after day after day If you believe the company of that game is so evil, liar, cheater (add enough number of negative personal traits here) It is like being in an abusive relationship :)
-
I KNEW IT! What did you do to my ENTERPRISE... ???? Oh.. shoot.. I don't have an enterprise.. .still..
-
you can always tag them in your posts, or PM them about your chat bans.. Try, tagging / PMing any of them..
-
Match Making = Quit or Find another Game !!!
Excavatus replied to _3frit_'s topic in General Discussion
Please use the MM thread for MM related discussions. And try to watch the language next time. -
Matchmaker Discussion Thread & MM Balance
Excavatus replied to Excavatus's topic in General Discussion
Matchmaking is completely random. Yes from time to time, you can have very bad teammates while there are amazingly good enemies on the other side. And the opposite can happen too. With the increasing number of battles, all anomalies even out themselves, and your WR will start to reflect your OWN performance. I see what you mean by your winrate dropping sharply, all of us gets bad streaks time to time, as well as good streaks too. If you want to make observations on your stats, don't look at individual sessions, but look at the big picture. -
Sorry mate, but If this is your "Average at best" I don't want to know what is "good" for your standards.
-
Have fun in your new home!
-
Yes.. .this.. lets try
-
How you dare to bring logic here!!!
-
I'm sorry mate, but your experience don't mean anything after it has been said numerous times by WG officials that "More than 24-hour chat bans are reviewed and given manually" You can find it in this forum too.. it has been said many many times in the past.
-
and that is not an automated ban... Someone checked your chat logs and punished you for that... If you want, you can always ask WG officials here in forum, to know what you had said..
-
Tutorials, tooltips and streamlining in-game information
Excavatus replied to _Teob_'s topic in General Discussion
You are absolutely right about that, but there are a great number of players, who does not know the basics of the game, and they lack the information of that they don't know the basics. These players even though they are bad, they can be just average only by being spoon fed with information and practical training. I guess thats what Teob is talking about. -
What a great SBMM topic. How about we discuss MM issues in MM topic :) This one will be locked.
-
Matchmaker Discussion Thread & MM Balance
Excavatus replied to Excavatus's topic in General Discussion
what was the enemy ship? -
Then I must be dreaming.. It happens when I play CVs :)
-
The real problem with the Dockyard might surprise you
Excavatus replied to Miragetank90's topic in Off-Topic
Thought of locking it.. But this is a very quality post woaw! 10/8 So moved into offtopic! -
I remember citadeling something with midway HE bombers... vaugely remember that.. once I guess.. can't remember what it is.. or was it TiTs?
-
may be mino and / or colbert? If you are lucky enough? I don't know about their citadel roof armor to be honest. can someone enlighten us?
-
Stat Shaming Rule Clarification Request.
Excavatus replied to Sunleader's topic in General Discussion
Errrm! no.. Gentelmen, Lets not kid each other. Stat Shaming and "NAMING & SHAMING" in a more broad sense... We all know what it is. Before you post about someone's stats, video footage, screenshot... Ask these questions to yourself and be honest about the answers.. 1) do I have good intensions or bad ? 2) Do I reply to this user just to assert my superiority? 3) Do I really post just to be RIGHT? 3) Do I want to help them or just want to hurt them? 4) Will my post be CONSTRUCTIVE towards the user & the topic? Then you'll find the Naming & Shaming very easy to deal with! -
Funny or Sad messages you recieve after a Battle.
Excavatus replied to Cyclops_'s topic in General Discussion
Hello we already have one topic for that.. 82 pages long.. I don't think we need another one.
