Excavatus

Show me any other online game with NO RESPAWN mechanic, and divided into 10 tiers and hundreds of different ships? That is the point you (not you in personal but people asking SBMM in general) refuse to see.. You cannot implement SBMM in this match system... Someone tried with another tank game, They've lost players faster than shooting stars.. They've tried to revert it into random.. but it was too late for them. They've come out the idea "WE HAVE THE SBMM YOU'VE BEEN ASKING FOR YEARS" people ran there.. then ran back.. Let me give you an example.. What are you gonna use as indicator.. like many people suggested.. WR? Here, my general WR: but here my WR for Helena : and my moskva : My Iowa : My Harugumo: M kremlin : My Musashi: And My bismarck : So where this MM supposed to put me in? you may suggest, the MM shoud look into not only global WR but also into Tier WR, Ship WR, Class WR.. Can't you see how long it would for MM to put together a match, especially at certain hours.. But regardless of these above.. I want to stress it out again.. you cannot put SBMM into a game without a respawn mechanic.. SBMM is founded on the idea of creating equal and fair teams.. The teams will be equal and fair, until you lose one ship... then equal and fair flies out the window.. poof.. gone.. SBMM will strengthen the snowball effect..

first of all, and again, it is not MY MM, no MY System, not MY company. I'm a player like you.. And I'm certainly not gonna try o convinvce you these are only shadows when you are sure they are monsters.. I've given the answers you're looking for may be 10 times just in this topic, so as the others. you don't want to accept or even consider them.. so, lets agree to disagree.. MM is rigged for you.. MM is not rigged for me.. Lets have it like this.

I'm just thinking about new 23knots top speed US BBs.... then I start to giggle out of nowhere!

rigged for what? to make specific players lose? Why those people though? why not others?

people paid 35K steel for a disabled yamato..

I don't think this game can be more arcade than this :) You'll hit your allies.. your torps won't go through them.. but They will not take any damage.. It is what its like in wot

People were complaining about putting UU into the RB and hiding them behind a grind/pay wall... WG makes the UU mostly Okish / not Okish.. not necessary completely.. People complain about that now :) I love this forum..

Additionally, we understand there might be concerns about the ship dealing damage to allies, and we plan to take them into account when the ship will be released. From this, I'm thinking, may be they are considering removing the team damage altogether. Like they did in WOT..

First of all, how many times It's been sid, I've already forgot but gonna tell this again, Moderators are not WG employees. We are regular players like others, just have some volunteered moderating duties in the forum. Anyway, thanks for the answer, so basically you want good players to be punished by being responsible to carry EVERY match they play, and bad players to be rewarded by getting carried.. So there won't be any incentive for them to git gud! Imagine the worse you get, the better players you get on your team :) Amazing!! And the opposite is true... the better you get, game will give you worse and worse players as team mates..

so let me ask to understand better.. When those 3 guys are in the enemy team... you want game to put more "BAD" players on their team, and more "GOOD" players on your team, and you call this balanced? fair? fair for whom? why those guys have to carry every team just because they are good players? Why do they have to get always bad players on their team? how fair it is for them?

Closed as requested!

I don't remember watching this :) but WoWs Launch Trailer.. 2.17 duration, 1.10 about aircrafts and CVs, total 1.40 about CVs :) Now everything is crystal clear for me :)

My personal bet is getting a second BB line for US... like secondary BBs..

Do you have IFHE on your captain? Because US BBs really need IFHE for secondary builds..

In an ideal world it cannot be because either selling an account or using a botting software is illegal in WoWs.

Hello OP, I guess we need more explanation about the subject.. because from what you've written, I understood that, you start to play X ship with 10 XP, you finish the battle, earning 5 XP, and when you get back to port, you don't see 15XP on that ship which should be impossible. Gib more details please.

really!!?? fighting even on this topic?? Guys.. this ends now.. Thank you..

actually first, lets use the CV discussion thread !

I've suggested this before, since a new topic about carma, will suggest that again.. 1) make reports does not drop karma.. 2) remove "more + karma more reports" system, 3) let the + karma people get to accumulate, 4) find a reward at the begining of the year (like 1 year premium or short, or a prem ship, some coal, steel etc..) 5) at the christmas stream, gib reward to the player who collected most + karma through out the year 6) reset karma every year..

I just want to hopeful too, but after the PR event, the financial numbers showed the GREAT majority of the playebase are not in around here, and they don't care what WG does.. they just gib money..

I personally think, even someone in the favor of this boycott, The main income source of WG is Randoms.. so I'm not sure how it will affect them If the CB praticipation drops to %50 in next season..

No it is not a joke. I simply want this topic clean out of the same discussion we have in multiple topics in the forum. So it does not turn into one their copies. You can always talk about that subject in one of those topics. because This "boycott" organisation seems important and I want people to stay on it.. instead of losing it in the numerous pages of same discussion. If that does not sound logical to you.. I'm sorry about it..

We have more than a couple topics discussing about the CV in CB situation. This topic is actually more like an announcement, It would be easy to lock & pin it.. but I prefer to keep it open because people may want to talk and discuss about the "CB Boycott Organisation"