Miragetank90

Inclement weather - i.e. Cyclones and thunderstorms already improve the ''gameplay flow'' by forcing different actions and pushing players into different situations, despite the complaints from some. In addition, these at least make sense within the confines of a naval-themed combat game. A shrinking map doesn't. To me, this would only be acceptable and fun in special modes, like April fools, etc.

What are you saying?! I only JUST removed my Xmas tree yesterday, and I still have other decor still up! And am gradually working them out for Chinese new year ones.

I almost forgot these were fictional, and started to think, why is this all so new to me?

Can I come? We could protest outside WG HQ for funsies I'll bring placards!

RIP Yueyang, you were already dead

I don't play low tiers much, if at all. However, in the odd time I have played them post-rework - I'm thinking that if I was a brand new player and I didn't like warships so much, I would not have stuck around. Largely thanks to Hosho. And lots of them. Now, I'm not one of the CV haters, but things in low tier seemed kind of egregious to me.

Meh, I still think WoT community is the absolute worst among WG games. This one is no where near as bad, and that's an accomplishment!

Are you using a secondary build? I built main guns. Improved USN dispersion module. Never had any issues with Georgias' accuracy.

Either Free XP or Coal would be nice. Heck, steel is just fine too. Basically I'm just down with anything that is NOT RESEARCH POINTS.

Things are on fire, yeah. But at least the memes are top tier.

Considering this ''interesting' year wows has been through, I sometimes wonder if this boat has a new skipper

It's slower than Kongo but still faster than the US Dreadnoughts. Your guns are the same, but reload faster and turn faster too IIRC, not to mention you get more of them for a much heavier broadside. You also have better protection overall. As for accuracy, I recall having a different experience... I really couldn't complain, I thought it was fine. idk. But, as always, you might have bad luck and your shells end up being ineffectual in what might otherwise have been a perfect shot. I don't really know of any special tips when it comes to Fuso, but it's true she is lacking in manoeuvrability compared to Kongo. Just keep it in mind when playing, because you'll have a harder time escaping from trouble if you make a mistake or overextend for instance. Kongo is a bit more forgiving in this regard relatively speaking thanks to her speed. But well, I haven't played Fuso in quite some time. Maybe others can be more useful.

Did they change people at WOWS management this year or something? Seriously.

I feel like we've gone slightly off topic Sorry @The_Chiv But hey, welcome to EU! Enjoy your stay!

Moving from 1 battle as you originally said then upping it to 5 is shifting the goalpost. It's true that skill level and playstyle is not mutually exclusive. I'm not disagreeing with that and it's not my point of contention. Neither is his observation, maybe he's correct, maybe he's wrong. Who knows? I fall back to what you said an hour ago because THAT is my point of contention. Don't mistake what I am arguing. And again I state, right or wrong, ''accurate'' observation of the playerbase with the first battle is something very easy to throw out. The observation may be correct, or otherwise, but its still flawed. Say you have a worker of a species of ant. Do you observe and therefore know, accurately, the ants of this species for observing just the one worker ant, or do you look at more and more over time, and in different situations and environments, different times of year, etc. and build a clearer picture of this type of ant from time and further study? Say the worker ant is 1 battle. Is ONE worker ant, pretty much identical to every other worker in the colony, enough to tell you all you need to know then and there? Highly doubtful.

Fiiiiine. See what you've done? Even my cold, dead heart feels bad now. Don't ever say Mirage never listens. I feel like you're missing the point. To get an accurate idea of the playerbase would need far more than 1 battle as you previously claimed(Let's not shift the goalposts, now). That's just science. There are so many players on EU, that to claim such a thing is ludicrous. idk why you're bringing skill levels into this, when this was not part of the original observation of Mr.Chiv. He noted the differences between NA and EU not in skill colour, for lack of a better word... but rather mannerism/playstyle, which you then claimed was possible to ascertain in the FIRST battle. It doesn't matter if he is correct or not in the assumptions, because to assume such a thing from 1 game is in itself, flawed. That's all.

Looks like all those Scientists and surveys were wrong all along! The ideal sample size for accurate results is 1!(Or 5)

I think It's less about you, and more about your claims.

He's either trolling or an idiot(No offence) The first battle is going to provide all the info needed, and accurately... really. One battle(and at any tier, I guess?) is going to tell you everything you need to know to make accurate observation of the entire playerbase? The quality of battles will always stay roughly the same as they currently are, i.e. as you just experienced it in that first game. Really. Gaining more experience through more battles does not give you better understanding and is flawed logically. Really. Megathonk.

Not enough Pantera in this thread. PANTERA - MOUTH FOR WAR(VULGAR DISPLAY OF POWER) - 1992 Is everyone feeling motivated?

Ship building tokens. Let us know how it works out for you!

Good for you. Opinions are nice. You are of course, free to do what you want, in much the same way as people are allowed to speak up when they think something stinks.

Same here, but I just don't know anymore.

I honestly don't even remember... maybe I didn't after all, hence the issue? There were 2 days last week where I didn't log-in, I think... It's OK. I don't want to waste anyone's time. Thanks anyway Crysantos