Miragetank90

You guys are not very server-patriotic. Very problematic indeed! Everyone knows EU is the best, and come KOTS we will show the world, again. ALL WILL PERISH. THIS MEANS YOU, SMILE!!!!

Khaba doesn't really care about radar because of the way it plays and its already high detectability. The torps are also only really useful at near point blank, when you rush a guy or maybe if you manage to catch him round an island. It's not a torp DD and never will be. If we're talking about range increase, however, imo 8km would be just right, 10 is too much. IIRC it used to be 10km actually, before they nerfed it years back.

Part of the problem is only 2 DBs for that crap circle reticle. If it we're 3 or maybe even 4, it wouldn't be perfect but it would be a vast improvement, even if everything else stayed the same.

For a 10 pointer, this is fine. Imo the best starting choices for most BBs. But don't bother getting DE, waste of 3 points for minimal percentage gain. For example, Smolensk loves DE, because it stands to make a great gain from it in terms of percentage increase in fire chance. Smolensk base fire chance is 8(w/o flags) per shell. With DE, it becomes 10. That represents a 25% increase in fire chance per shell. Meanwhile, a BB, say Conq has 48 baked in. With DE, it becomes 50... a minuscule percentage increase for 3 points. See what I mean? Skip DE for BBs, always. ^ My brit BB build.

The main thing for me is that FDR is here, since I am a fan of the Midways. With Skypirates!(Added bonus for me). I'm also happy to finally have a special/prem(?) TierX CV, though some are understandably not feeling it. The rest is... 'interesting'. I'll be watching it closely.

Vanguard is love... Vanguard is life... One of my all time favourite ships but not what I would call the best tier for tier. Among the 3 you guys are talking about, it's Warspite imo. Vanguard is also not a good ship for newbies, and I'm not saying this because it's tier 8. I don't mean anything bad about anyone, it's just the way she is and the way she plays. Sexy as hell though.

Also a sexy plane for me. I guess something about Contra-Rotating Propellers makes me happy

Check the captain skill tree in game when he's in a Techtree i.e. silver ship he's not trained for. The skills skills he has appear orange, and it'll tell you these skills are working at reduced effectiveness if you mouse over them. In some cases, they don't work entirely.

I actually like the look of the Skypirate, I've been hoping to see it in game, so I'm happy.

So, I've been thinking about the little nerfs accumulating on Kremlin. It's good that it's getting attention, but what if curbing Kremlin was approached in a different way? What if, in addition to the next nerf which lowers the sigma, we raise the model? At the moment, Kremlin's model sits very low in the water at the midsection, and is not in line with most other BBs at this tier. Only Kurfurst is comparable, and even then its higher up than Kremlin. Yama GK Conq Repu Monty Krem and GK from another angle Not perfect screens, but I tried to get them right. You get the idea and you can also view the same in port. Right now, People complain about not being able to punish Kremlin in the side properly. If we raise the model, it should make the citadel and upper armour belt even more accessible, which would be emphasising the weakness of Kremlin to damage from the flanks, like other RU BBs. In this way, the ship keeps what is strong about it, while magnifying it's weaknesses and making it less forgiving to bad plays. It becomes easier to punish. After this and the sigma nerf, we sit on it for a while and see what happens. Though, a concealment nerf to at least 14, maybe 14.1km with full concealment build I would not be opposed to on top of these as well. Thoughts?

Shima model is also wrong if you compare the bow to historical photographs. I guess we just have to wait till they update the models. Tirp, Gearing and Shima are all among the very oldest. They did fix Yama up, give it some more time I guess.

You will still get this steel even if you play in a higher league. For example: Your clan is in Hurricane, but you haven't played a single battle this season. Let's say both alpha and bravo are hurricane. If you join them in CB now, you will gain not only the Hurricane steel but also gain progress in all previous missions for all previous leagues. So, it's not lost to you.

Improved the heal. It's now the same as the other higher tier US mainline BBs, it heals for more total and more per tick than a standard heal. IIRC

PEF is Mackensen-class no? She was given a name and launched, just not finished and then scrapped. It's the right period - WW1 Battlecruiser. So it's not pure fantasy after all. Just the AA and DP guns. And then we have the Queen Elizabeths and their refits. Not fantasy, but obviously not period accurate if you want WW1 battles. It would be nice.

They are right? But while on paper one or two designs are close enough to Montana, some of these designs are too crazy to be considered for addition I think. Maybe in some special mode? Never say never, anyway. Super Yamato is coming after all. Maybe we will get a Tillman design someday. Just leave out the 24 16inch gun and the 13 and 15 18inch gun designs plox

I think there can still be meaningful WW1 action at low tier, but the issue is the apparent volume of CVs, or so I am told. Not very WW1. We actually have plenty of WW1 era ships in the game, though. It's just that many exist in here with upgraded hulls or fictional refits, like Prinz Eitel Fredrich. Referring to the AA guns and DP armament in this case.

Sure, for lower tiers But let's leave out the Tillmans mkay

The bull I am referring to is the illusion that the USSR navy is somehow never nerfed and the subject of bias. I would say you are the one who already made up his mind, and is unable to even entertain this thought, since you just ignored my arguments on the matter and claim I ''don't want to discuss it'' And it's not that I don't respect other people's opinions, on the contrary. What I don't respect was the post that is now deleted. But what can I do. Shrug. Good day.

I'm REALLY looking forward to the Italian BB line. Imo It can't come soon enough

All this based on the fact that I got miffed at the nonsense of the guy above. You must be an oracle or mind reader, you know me so well already. The truth is, you agree with him - and that's fine, but I don't sweetpea, and you just couldn't take it. So you claimed I am not interested in discussion and left. Now here you are again! I'm evil, but I'm not that evil Besides, your posts appear to be doing that for me. Woe is me, I'm so evil to be calling out bull

I'm all for moar ships as long as they fit within the confines of the game and can be balanced I don't care what nation it is.

I discussed plenty. Perhaps you should take a look at the rest of the thread rather than chickening out of my arguments. You didn't even address a single point. Can you not counter-argue? I believe I am done with you. Come back if you actually want to talk, and not act like a indignant kid who spilled his milk

Now it's maybe not overpowered. Just a post above you cited it as an example of an ''OP / Clearly unbalanced ship'' Make up your mind?

OP is very clearly subjective in this game because everyone has a different view. If that isn't the case, there must be some statistical threshold you cross where it's OP confirmed. What is it, I wonder? My own view I have already made clear. I'll add to that and say, as I have said before, some people in here need to learn the difference between Very strong/OP and also Annoying/OP. Intriguing also, how you conveniently forget that RU ships have been nerfed in the past - and hard. We're you playing this game when Khabarovsk came out? Or the then lackluster Grozo? What about the little nerfs accumulating on Kremlin right now? People complain, WG uses the sledgehammer when nerfing ships. So now that they do it carefully, it's not? Is it 'cause Kremlin is an RU ship? Such double standards. Honestly with the sometimes nonsensical, cherry-picked bull I see in here you'll have to forgive me if I call Russophobia. Take this guy I responded to, for example. He doesn't even talk about Kremlin balance or lack thereof at all. His whole post is a diatribe of venom filled nonsense attacking the USSR navy. That's fine, he can say what he wants. So can I. And these designs, if they truly are too strong, as you apparently believe, can be made balanced. That guy above is not discussing balance. He just doesn't want USSR navy ships at all, and I am contesting that. If you want a design that is truly not OK, you should look up the Tillman BBs. and, BTW, Kremlin and Yama have the same number of guns.......

Peter the great called, he said you have no idea what you are talking about. So much of what you appear to take as fact is also plain wrong. Not to mention, you think ship designs are fine as long as they come from any other place except the USSR. Designs are designs. Why are some OK and others aren't? If they all fit within the confines of this game then I see no issues. Honestly, this Russophobia is so funny. You'd think these players are constantly tuned in to CNN.