Miragetank90

And yet so many people complain about Kremlins' ''insane accuracy''. With the nerfs now it's much better compared to when it first came out. Derpy is a good descriptor, unless the enemy is less than mid-range. Armour and tankiness is not a problem, especially given Kremlin is supposed to be a frontliner. In the past however I've advocated for making the citadel more easy to pen. In any case, I feel it's OK for now. And Kuznetsov was a mistake, but this is not an issue with Kremlin per se. I hope they never add something like that ever again.

I wouldn't go so far as to ignore it, but it has it's problems. Case in point which hasn't been brought up yet: Skewing. We got a well known example in Bourg for instance.

Hey, I like that... I'll use it next time I'm in a div and my div mates farm all the damage and yoink all the kills Joking aside, I think it's more complicated than that. But at the end of the day, wouldn't you rather have a Unicum DD on your side than a potato one?

bump

Given that Jss checked and found these to be solo stats, these are better answers than mine. @Profilus That was an interesting example indeed.

If a W/R is disproportionately high after all those battles, It kinda does though. For all we know, the better W/R on the bottom one could have been the result of divving. Some people spend a lot of the time in divs, some most of the time, even. What that screen shows, at least to me, is two players of very similar level over the same number of battles, with one winning more often likely as a result of divving, given the closeness of their PR I'd hesitate to attach the greater number of wins too strongly to superior skills on the part of the bigger winner.

Er... sure... You lost more in one than the other? I mean, what would you like me to say? I can't tell you why you've lost more games in one Fletcher-class ship compared to the other. It could be anything. Not just because you were or were not carried.

Yes. At the same time, if he wants to get his PR up, for better or for worse it is important in this case. I wouldn't disregard PR, ever. As others have said in many threads before, it's not perfect but a pretty good representation of how well you handle yourself in your ships, especially when paired with W/R. There is a reason why so much emphasis is placed on these stats when you try to join a competitive clan. It's not just for show, or that they like to have their clan profiles looking all purple. It's because they are quite representative of you as a player, and shows what level of plays they can expect of you.

Not always. You gave an example of such. But if it's low PR paired with decent W/R as in the OPs case, happening consistently in his recents as he says, then chances are that it is.

Just focus on improving your play without fussing too much over the numbers, and your PR will pick up. Sounds very general and kinda vague, but it's the best advice I can offer. And you're absolutely right. A dead ship can no longer contribute. If you find yourself dying too quickly too often, that will translate to low PR.

PR takes these into consideration, in order of importance: Dmg, Kills, W/R. So to boost PR, damage and Kills matter most. So if your PR is low, but your winrate is good, you are not contributing enough in the aforementioned areas and are most probably being carried most of the time.

You mean you don't know? Matches are decided before the game starts. Everyone is outbidding each other before the loading timer reaches zero to decide who is going to win. Try it and you'll win more.

Yes. Yes they can. Kurfurst is actually much, much better at not getting Yamatoed through the bow, though it's still possible. I honestly don't get why people are still clamouring for Kremlin nerfs. With the alpha and sigma nerfs it's in a better spot now. And even if it's AA was the least of everyone's concerns, it's now worthless, thanks to the fragility of the mounts. I don't get why they are actually planning on nerfing it's AA further. For now I find it OK. What you propose would just kill the ship for what it is intended to do.

I started playing WoT back when M6 could still meet Maus in normal MM. But, I quit a long time ago. Retired as almost unicum in overalls, which I'm OK with, given I played with constant 300ms. Never looked back since. I sometimes miss my M48 Patton, T110E5, Maus, 113. Or my Chinese lights. The rest of the game though can suck it, as far as I'm concerned. Not worth my time anymore. Although, I might consider testing the waters a little again, if they had a server transfer event from NA(My account location) to EU. But in all these years I played, they have never shown any interest in doing so. All NA had was a SEA transfer event window once IIRC and that's it.

And so, Metal Gods brought forth \m/ ''Metal Gods'' \m/ JUDAS PRIEST - METAL GODS(1980)

bump

Really confused in the end about the directives and grinding, what you have to pay for, and what you don't, at what stage you have to pay if at all, etc. Based on this discussion looks like I'm not alone either.

Erasure of Smolensk alone = +1 in my book. Good job.

No doubt. Knowing what to do when, and how to do it is not always straightforward, and needs experience. It's not easy, but doable. Just pushing without taking everything into consideration though is a recipe for disaster, which is what the majority of random BB pushers are doing. About Kremlin, personally I still enjoy it in randoms occasionally.

Yamato is a goddess among ships. I'm not even joking. Bismarck might suit your playstyle more, hence why you like it more. I also like Bismarck a lot. And Kurfurst.

Maybe to offset this, they'll go the way of WoT and introduce gold shells. Joking aside, this is perhaps the one thing that would make me leave this game. For good.

Bump

It was interesting in the beginning, and it was different. Now it's just sad. Playing this season has become a chore.