Miragetank90

That's good. I don't particularly mind either Still quietly waiting for Massa <3

Works no problem. Done that since day one. Would make things much easier for you. Just put shortcuts on each PC, connect your drive and you're good to go. Easy updates and no need for an instance on each anymore.

Why not save space on both and install it to an external instead? This way also simplifies updates as you'll only need to update the one copy which you can then use on both PCs.

Sovetskaya Rossiya huh... looking forward to it. I feel for her though. Gigantomastia is a serious medical condition that many shipgirls suffer from.

Starbound I don't really bother with the mount licences personally, to the point I even forgot about that system lol. The ones I do have I got from straight from the storefront - the Skyscale ones. Starbound would look great with my Astralaria though I think we've gone off-topic Nice to see another GW2 player in here o7

In 7 years of playing I almost forgot about Black Lion Chests. In any case, I don't consider these or mount adoption licenses worthy of any scorn or lootbox backlash a la Battlefront EA. I'll try to explain. As you know BL chests drop randomly from enemies and/or can be bought dirt cheap for in game currency as well. When opening them, you're provided with a preview of what you can get and their droprates, common to rare, along with some guaranteed drops and currencies. The boxes only contain boosters(like XP, crafting) convenience items you can also get elsewhere or straight up buy from the store, or cosmetics like weap. skins(with some exclusive to the chests). That's it. You can play the whole game without bothering with BL boxes at all. It has zero effect on gameplay, progression, or anything else. Lastly, the keys you need to open them can be obtained for free by by converting in-game currency to gems, and then bought. You can quite easily buy a quite lot of keys if you play the game frequently. Or you can straight up buy them with gems from your credit card in bundles of 1,5,10, or 25 and IIRC it's very cheap, among the cheapest things in the store. So yeah. I guess technically they have lootboxes, but it's really not oppressive as a system and not as bad as the name has come to imply, at least in this case.

bump

Arenanet https://www.guildwars2.com/en-gb/ And still top tier in terms of earnings among MMOs. It was not far behind WoT at one point. Idk the very latest figures though. I'll always respect this dev for their actions and transparent business model.

So, trash was the prediction, and trash remains the consensus huh? ... I want it.

Mine doesn't. I call hax.

Like I said, we need a sticky thread explaining the hows and whys of bans at this point.

Nah. If anything the game has been dumbed down somewhat over the years, especially considering CV rework as a whole - imo the most glaring example of dumbing down in WoWs yet.

AFAIK yes. I mean, they proc in randoms and ranked, so I don't see why not. Reminder to anyone else reading this and who might not know - no captain exclusive legendary abilities proc in CBs.

I really liked her outfit. Rugged, yet stylish. I feel like drawing now.

Good choice. And Aigle is a good pick. Out of the ones you listed above(I have them all, save Agir), I'd pick Georgia for pure fun and hilarity. She's also really, really strong. Just a personal recommendation from me w/o thinking too hard.

Guys please

Don't forget Marceau. And Charleston, if you're into kicking seals Also for coal - Admiral Lutjens - for an amazing 175,000 coal.

bump

If you mean the AA/air conceal change, no one knows yet. It's just an idea that's still due to be tested. And I'd hesitate to call it a ''buff''.

LM/UU is supposed to be a sidegrade, they have said so since the beginning. Some of these are legitimate sidegrades. Yamato for instance, now you choose DPM or accuracy. That's good, a clear choice and definitely a sidegrade with pros and cons. Then you look at Kremlin and you see something you may as well not think about choosing. It's objectively worse than the best option, reload mod. For gaining 2 seconds of reload over the latter you lose big time in other areas. With Reload mod, you're still at a comfortable 29 sec salvo cycle without losing anything(turret traverse penalty doesn't count. 30 sec with that mod is still a dream for a BB). It's not a sidegrade at all. It doesn't offer a new playstyle and it's not on par with the best mods for this ship. Some people will complain about anything, yes. But we shouldn't dismiss all complaints out of hand. There are legitimate criticisms to be made. If WGs vision for UUs is to make sidegrades, some of them need more tweaks and/or concept changes to bring them in line or at least make them interesting. We'll see what changes the next tests bring.

@CptMinia Legit question. Why make a new thread about this and ''split the discussion and feedback'' when we have the previous officially posted thread to discuss it in? Just saying, you guys close down other similar duplicate threads all the time.

Kremlin UU is utter , useful only in very choice situations, basically no reason to mount it otherwise over reload mod. Good luck gimping your frontline BBs' survivability and range in WoWs tier 10 meta. I hate it when they reduce an already low range even further. Just why. Kurfurst UU comes to mind, but at least she can use a spotter.

The entire month of June for me in a nutshell. I lost 0.07% off my W/R actually

bump