Cpt_Aries

Agreed, some things must be earned not bought.

Is there any way to activate DX12 in the game?

I think that it will be a great idea to implement some kind of roster for containers (daily or mission containers). So that people (like me) who don't want to open their containers instantly will have a roster of containers and choose randomly which one to open. What do you think?

I cannot recall how I got that RN DD Campbeltown and that ship rusted in port for a long time until 5 Year Epoch campaign didn't come out. I have found that this Destroyer is pretty nasty Destroyer for its tier, and really fun to play.

The same issue as with artillery in WoT, everybody hates it... until you start playing with it. CV play can be pretty fun until you realize that your squadron is wiped out by Bayern's AA And we all know that Bayern have supreme AA It's just a game mechanics, it will stick forever.

Does this mean that I can play on other servers (regions) with an EU account, or I must create a new acc for the NA server but not install a separate game. I don't fully get it, please advise.

I think this system is much better https://eu.wargaming.net/support/en/products/wotb/article/10278/

You need Kurfurst, Kremlin, and Montana researched to gain access to submarines. If you want to gain nuclear capability, you have to build uranium mine in your base.

Hello, I wonder why Account leveling is forgotten and left out from any change? It should be rearranged and expanded, especially now when we have a much larger player pool then in the beginning. It could solve many problems with newcomers who screaming about battling with much more experienced players. That could also deflate that balloon of everpresent MM issues about "disbalance".

I have Dragon (Myoko) and I can tell it is much harder to play then Algerie... those gun arcs are awful... LOL

I don't know if they ever gonna do that, but if they do, it will be more complex marks to achieve. I personally believe that if one has 1000 battles, one will surely know how game works. Everything above is simple details in gameplay. And there is a question, what comes next? Captain skills, upgrades mounted, flags... a more complex algorithm is prone to fail and queue time will be much prolonged. Anyway, my question is based on Account Level, and why it's neglected. It could be an answer to balancing players.

Right, that's a bummer. I don't know about him but I'll use speed and range to burn them down as much as possible. Same as with Martel vs tier X, it's hard but manageable. You must exploit all your ship's pros in those situations... and a little bit of luck.

True, but that's not the only reason why account leveling shouldn't be exploited much further. It has huge potential as an organizing tool. It's funny that you need only 200 battles to acquire level 15 and unlock everything. And that's it.

Agreed. Especially those high tier premiums who doesn't know how to exploit their ship properly. Personally, when I see more than 2 high tier premium ships in my team I know that it gonna be a hard game.

I guess that it should be arranged +/-1 till tier VI and from there it is manageable to play against 2 tiers higher ships.

True. Everybody was in training mode (except testers) back in the day. Nowadays, is much more challenging. Reality is that one cannot pick hard or easy mode, that is why it's random. I guess that one must know the pros & cons of a ship and to exploit that in some hard situations. This is one way to react to a bad MM setup.

Rank in Ranked Battles doesn't mean anything. One can have rank 1 with a gold star in Rank Sprint with tier VII in 6 hours or not play standard Ranked Battles at all. Does that gold star define a player's experience? Not at all.

Let's take just a difference between 10 skill Captain and 19 skill Captain... huge difference

You have a good idea with Account Level, why stop at level 15. I suggest some rearrangement, it is funny that you need only 200 battles to reach level 15 and unlock everything. It should be arranged differently so it could protect new players and provide a solution for some MM disbalance.

It is good so far, pretty much fair. Except for one tiny & nasty bummer. It appears that sometimes the algorithm manages to sort experienced players in one team and inexperienced players in other (high tiers mostly), and no divisions involved. At first, I assume that I'm tripping but after close inspection of team-ups after the battle, it appears that I'm not. One can only imagine how these matches end up, the quick and utter destruction of underdogs.

Agreed. For all the time, stress and money invested in this event, one will surely expect one really OP cruiser, but in reality, it is mediocre. Nothing special about it. I have encountered a few, and from my experience, it is killable as most US cruisers...even with tier VIII. Which proves your point, and show us that WG setup this event to target greedy whales for a ripoff. Easy money for WG and mediocre cruiser for some, with a big target on their ship. But, someone will disagree.

I have noticed in the past 2-3 weeks that matchmaker acts differently, it is fine by sorting tiers and classes but sorting players is awkward. I am an average player and the odd thing is when end up in the top 3 players as the lowest tier in the team (mostly losing). When I examine the team setup I can see that most experienced players are set in the winning team and most of the inexperienced players are set in the other. I believe that balancing this is an easy fix for you.

I can see this situation in 2 ways, as an average player who spends some time playing in spare time after work and as a greedy spoiled crybaby. For me, as an average player, this Puerto Rico event is optional because I don't have the amount of time needed to grind this ship. Frankly, this is fine by me, I am satisfied with grinding Gorizia and I think it is a very good ship for a New Year event, tier VII premium cruiser for an easy grind. On the other hand, if one wants more then that and wants to get a tier X premium cruiser it should invest more time and effort to grind it, and it shouldn't be easy. As a crybaby, who wants easy grind and free stuff, I can see why all the fuss is about. Anyway, I think that this kind of grinding is very interesting as a new feature in the game. I will like to see it becoming a permanent feature, and maybe you can introduce new (or old) ships of lower tiers for an appropriate time for building it.

Yeah, big issue. But this Ranked session was purely Advertisement for Tier IX Premium ships. Good revenue from that for the WG, and it's OK. But then we should have PREMIUM Ranked session and STANDARD Ranked session, there so in premium session, buffed premiums can radar each other as they like...but in standard session, you need to play Seattle or Buffalo for that trait and we know how they react to AP from tier IX BB...not like Kronshtadt or Alaska I guess...

Honestly, I stuck on a 10/9 level (as shown in graph) mostly because of premiums like JB and Musashi who ruined this ranked (just my thought). One step forward, one step backward, I don't think premium ships should be implemented in ranked battles. Standard researchable ships of any tier are fine enough.