Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

T0byJug

Quality Poster
  • Content Сount

    5,358
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    25531
  • Clan

    [SCRUB]

Everything posted by T0byJug

  1. T0byJug

    WG Economy

    Your missing an important picture.. The detailed report. If your damage was all against Tier VIII and IX you will get credit return.
  2. T0byJug

    Exeter's Last Stand. Part 3

    Not really ALL the mission can be done in Co-op/Ranked and Random. Its just a copy and paist for all missions.. Stage 4 has a mission that says it can be done in Co-op that's impossible (get 7 achievements) at least in this one the CA's secondaries can set a fire...
  3. T0byJug

    Money back for faulty advertisment

    with you old chap EVERYTHING
  4. T0byJug

    Money back for faulty advertisment

    EU has proven again and again THEY will take a company to court if its braking the LAW.. Simple fact is WG is not.
  5. T0byJug

    Money back for faulty advertisment

    @Aschwell UK LAW https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-rights-for-consumers-when-buying-digital-content a 30 day time period to return faulty goods and get a full refund, the law was previously unclear on how long this period should last so under UK Law if you have had it for 30 day you cant demand return..Simple fact is also this douse not effect ingame content in MMO's as the game company owns all content they can change it by law
  6. T0byJug

    Money back for faulty advertisment

    Good idea to check before you claim you know what your talking about... this took 20 seconds From https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/doing-business-eu/contract-rules/digital-contracts/digital-contract-rules_en#digital-contracts-for-europe Harmonising rules for purchasing digital content There are no EU-wide rules for faulty digital content. Some EU countries have already started designing their own legislation. We should avoid having 28 different sets of rules for digital content sold online. For a real digital single market to take root, a single set of rules would bring legal certainty and thus help businesses expand their activities to foreign markets while giving consumers trust to embrace the benefits of the digital single market. Harmonised rules for digital content products will reduce the costs for traders and encourage them to expand cross-border. They will no longer need to deal with contract law differences in each EU country they wish to sell to. Consumers will know what they can expect when they buy digital content online, and that they have rights if the product is faulty.
  7. T0byJug

    Money back for faulty advertisment

    Not this old hat again....Search is your friend. This law douse not effect digital goods. If in the EURL they say thay hold to right to change the digital product.. Guess what they can change it.. Do you REALLY think A company the size of WG dont have a fleet of lawyers checking this..... From https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/doing-business-eu/contract-rules/digital-contracts/digital-contract-rules_en#digital-contracts-for-europe Harmonising rules for purchasing digital content There are no EU-wide rules for faulty digital content. Some EU countries have already started designing their own legislation. We should avoid having 28 different sets of rules for digital content sold online. For a real digital single market to take root, a single set of rules would bring legal certainty and thus help businesses expand their activities to foreign markets while giving consumers trust to embrace the benefits of the digital single market. Harmonised rules for digital content products will reduce the costs for traders and encourage them to expand cross-border. They will no longer need to deal with contract law differences in each EU country they wish to sell to. Consumers will know what they can expect when they buy digital content online, and that they have rights if the product is faulty. You got to love Bedroom lawyers...
  8. T0byJug

    HMS Agincourt

    Maybe he OP ment the Battle class DD of 1943 stock...
  9. T0byJug

    HMS Agincourt

    hell yes.. we need to start a Super tester campaign to get this mode
  10. Belfast/Nelson/Duke of York.... did 100k fire damage in 4 random games.. Icarus got 20 Torp hits in 3 Coop.... Know tier 7 and 8 DD's + Cossack. for 1000 gun hits
  11. T0byJug

    Wargaming is doing bullshittery again

    Because people love an OP ship. IF IT IS IN THERE PORT. and no people did NOT massively want her to stay as she was 98 people wanted her to change For the record I voted for rebalance.. I own her at tier V and i played her as a tier VI ship. she was still very strong.. Personally I think this is a mistake. Many of use bought her knowing she was OP so we should have expected a Nerf at some time. I own and play Belfast/GC and kamikaze R and i truly believe its better for the game that they are rebalanced
  12. Im pretty sure that's going to become the standard way in the future... (if WG have any sense) As for Arsenal... the perfect way would be to offer a Doubloon OR Steel refund (Steel being convertable to Coal) But i'm not sure how easy that would be to implement
  13. I think all options should be on the table as all the options singly are not viable. Examples. Belfast Removing her was a bad idea she is the biggest and probably most famous Museum ship in Europe. renaming her or bringing a rebalanced prem of sister ship will not work. She won't be the belfast Making her tier 8 she would need buffs.. Simplest way to make her balanced in my opinion is just make her have choice of Hydro OR Radar Then i think she would be fine. Giulio Cesare is so OP i don't think there is any option but to remove or uptier without fundamentally changing her. She may need a few small buffs at tier VI (AA looking at you) Things to take in to account with up tier option in General You had the ship for a time when she was OP and got to play her You got her cheaper (new Higher tier ship will cost more) The Credit/XP rewards will be greater on higher tier ship. On subject of we all new the ship was OP before release.. Remember Kamikaze R for a long time was a carbon copy of the tech tree tier 5 IJN DD minakazee.. its not always easy to see how OP a ship is before release (OK some it was obvious) Money Refund.. it would be up to the player to prove how much they paid for her.. after all someone that got Belfast ina sale,with a voucher or from a crate douse not have the right to the full cash value.... This would be a huge overhead to sort out.. The current in game Dubloon option is really the only way in my opinion
  14. T0byJug

    Cloned (and similar) ships: too many!

    @Midway67 1. Arkansas Beta & Wyoming AB was one of Beta tester Reward ship (Ark is basically same with basic hull but more secondaries, without any AA and with slower rudder shift time, is Arkansas Beta in fact the "Dreadnought"-version / hull A of Wyoming?) 3. Wickes & Campbeltown Same class CT was given because people were crying out for RN ships also completely different ships armament wise Wiks 4 guns 12 short range torps CT 3 guns and 6 long range torps (one is American, the other English, yet to me they look like the same ship with different camo's and, okay, different torpedo range)... 4. ARP Takao & Atago Ignore anime ship for campaign that was part of cartoon so multiple ships in cartoon featured 5. ARP Kongo & Kongo Ignore anime ship for campaign that was part of cartoon so multiple ships in cartoon featured 6. ARP Haruna & Kongo Ignore anime ship for campaign that was part of cartoon so multiple ships in cartoon featured 7. ARP Hiei & Kongo Ignore anime ship for campaign that was part of cartoon so multiple ships in cartoon featured 8. ARP Kirishima & Kongo Ignore anime ship for campain that was part of cartoon so multiple ships in cartoon featured 9. ARP Myoko & Myoko Ignore anime ship for campain that was part of cartoon so multiple ships in cartoon featured 10. ARP Ashigara & Myoko Ignore anime ship for campain that was part of cartoon so multiple ships in cartoon featured 11. ARP Haguro & Myoko Ignore anime ship for campain that was part of cartoon so multiple ships in cartoon featured 12. ARP Nachi & Myoko Ignore anime ship for campain that was part of cartoon so multiple ships in cartoon featured 13. Eastern Dragon & Myoko Ignore anime ship for campain that was part of cartoon so multiple ships in cartoon featured 14. Southern Dragon & Myoko Ignore anime ship for campain that was part of cartoon so multiple ships in cartoon featured 15. Iowa & Missouri (no radar vs. radar, one has spotter plane, the other doesn't; and different camo's, but essentially the same ship, right?) Give you this very similar 16. Ashitaka & Amagi (basically, the former is the A-hull version of the latter, with some minor differences and another camo) 17. Vampire & Valkyrie (one is regular, the other premium) Let the Australians have a ship or two 18. V-25 & Longjiang (only difference: torpedoes) and guns completely different ships play wise 19. Admiral Hipper & Prinz Eugen (one is regular, the other premium) Both real.. not many high tier REAL german ships to choose from 20. West Virginia & Colorado (WeeVee = basic hull of Colorado) People screaming out for West Virginia in USA 21. Atago & Atago B Black ships a black friday gimmick 22. Massachusetts & Massachusetts B black friday gimmick 24. Tirpitz & Bismarck (highly similar, except for torpedoes and some other minor differences) Both real.. not many high tier REAL german ships to choose from 25. Tirpitz & Tirpitz B black friday gimmick 26. Asashio & Asashio B black friday gimmick 27. Kagero & HSF Harekaze (minor differences and other camo's, yet otherwise the same ship) Completely DIFFERENT due to gun choices on HSF Harekaze also cartoon tie in 30. Helena & Nueve de Julio correction: Boise & Nueve de Julio Because they wanted South american ship for players there but US players wanted US version (note one came with not so difficult mission to get other free) 31. Omaha & Murmansk To get Russian ships in game early on with minimal Development (Russia WG biggest player group) 37. Leander & Huanghe (ditto) MMMM?????? Different class of ship.. Huanghe 6x2 main guns Leander 4x2 main guns know if you had said Leander and Perth..... 40. Warspite & Queen Elizabeth (one is premium, the other isn't) and very different secondary and AA armament. There interwar modifications were quit different also Warspite has more battle honners than any other steel warship built apart from maybe USS Enterprise so was bound to be a prem 42. Graf Spee & HSF Graf Spee cartoon tie in 49. Nassau & König Albert (they are different but look alike in quite a few ways) They look nothing like each other apart from the similarity you might expect for ships built by the same nation 50. Scharnhorst & Gneisenau (ditto) Very different Armement 51. Emden & Dresden (one is premium, the other regular tree) Go read the story of the Emden its amazing she SOOOOO deserved to be a prem and is a german ship with no Nazi connotations so is all positive 55. St. Louis & Charleston (this one is literally the same ship, only with another color... come on!!!! One regular, one premium... totally identical!) Ok will give you that blatant clone to allow seal clubbing with high point commanders 57. Mutsu & Nagato (former has original hull of latter, and is premium whereas latter is not) 58. Alabama & Alabama ST ST bragging ship nothing more 60. Krasny Krym & Svietlana (sisterships) But represented in game in modes about 20 years apart. Just being pedantic but they are not sister ships.. There the same ship renamed 62. Belfast & Edinburgh (sisterships, ok one has HE and AP, the other only AP) Again not many RN cruiser classes and as biggest museum ship in europe Belfast was so going to be a prem 63. Bellerophon & Dreadnought (again, regular versus premium, the rest appears as good as identical) Nope actually different classes of ship Dreadnought being a test bed the Bellerophon class derived from lessens learned also Dreadnought as first all big gun BB the created the hole ship type of battleship so deserved to be a prem 64. Benson & Loyang Ok will tie in all pan Asian ships here.. WG wanted nation non IJN for Asian market not surprisingly the IJN is not popular in many areas there. Asia did not have much of a ship building industry in time span of this game.. There navies we ships given or bought from other nations 65. Wichita & Baltimore Actually different classes with very different secondary armaments 69. Yahagi, I'm not sure but... doesn't she look a bit like Furutaka with some differences? Or is this actually a totally different ship?) one is a light cruiser with 15cm guns one is a heavy cruiser with 203mm guns and were built 20 years appart 70. To close this long list off: the planned T7 premium RU BB Lenin looks like an almost exact copy of T7 RN Premium HMS Nelson! Both have all guns located forward, both with 406mm caliber... both desighned by Basically yes there are a lot of closes but many of those you say are not.. As others have said prem ships is how WG make there money but they still need that class for the tech tree lines
  15. T0byJug

    New Błyskawica camo

    No one else has done it yet so i thought i would share... @Pecztery1337 Bloody well done mate........... she looks beautiful...
  16. T0byJug

    New Błyskawica camo

    PM sent.. for any others wondering what the good man @eliastion ment. Its the Polish Eagle shield on the port side of the funnel
  17. T0byJug

    New Błyskawica camo

    New Year camo for Dallas/Nuremberg Available as a reward during New Year's events in December 2016 and January 2017. Snowy Camo for New Mex Alternate permanent camouflage available through the New Year's Raid Type 12 for Bayer and Leander Alternate permanent camouflage available through the Santa's Christmas Convoys campaign for
  18. T0byJug

    New Błyskawica camo

    Well Spotted The design would have only been submitted on one side... so I guess its a mistake @MrConway Can this be fixed... shame to mess up a beautiful camo.. Its worth noting WG did not make the same mistake with the flag.....
  19. T0byJug

    New Błyskawica camo

    LOL I just wanted to show people what they were working to wards and Credit the designer for a bloody good job.......
  20. T0byJug

    New Błyskawica camo

    For F##k sake WG can never do a good thing for some people.... They had a competition to design a camo for a historical museum ship that is in game ..... They gave prizes to the finalists. Instead of selling the camo (and i would have paid the normal tier VII camo price for this) and thus monetizing the competition. They give it away as a simple mission... This is wargaming engaging the community and still people [edited]....... For the record i have well over 10+ tech tree ships with free prem Permo camo that we got for missions Hatsuharu Faragut Dallas New Mexico Badyonney Gaede Nuremberg Bayern Icarus Leander Fushun Normandie Just to name the tier VI and i have a number or Tier VIII as well and even some tier X.. And im not even counting the steam punk and halloween camos we have been given EDIT Just checked my invatery i have 35 free gifted camos that I got in missions or campaigns for Tech tree ships. + a number of others for Prem ships
  21. T0byJug

    New Błyskawica camo

    you need 20 of a possible 64 mission chains completed.. you may have already done some if you played much i the last 11 days.. Check combat missions in game
  22. T0byJug

    New Błyskawica camo

    complete 20 daily mission chains (there are 2 a day) this month
  23. T0byJug

    New Błyskawica camo

    The north where this ship is is great amazing beaches and a lot of history
  24. T0byJug

    Spotters are breaking cyclones... Again

    on that your wrong.. Recovery very much true.. ships often had to spread fuel oil on the sea to calm it down so they could recover there plane.. But a catapult launch could be done in almost any conditions. And lets remember Cyclone in the game is only a name , It means a storm or just bad weather. In a real cyclone fleets would not engage in any type of battle. apart from staying afloat. What we have in game is more a Rain squall.. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squall The name hardly has the same effect though
×