Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

T0byJug

Quality Poster
  • Content Сount

    5,358
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    25524
  • Clan

    [SCRUB]

Everything posted by T0byJug

  1. T0byJug

    If you wanna grind Benham...

    Benham is Great... ok i never played Black buit i Reckon Benham is much better
  2. There is a daily mission for Hill with 3 fuel..makes getting Benham easier. for information according to https://gamemodels3d.com/games/worldofwarships/vehicles/pasd505 Dubloon Value is 3500 or 13,57Euro
  3. T0byJug

    HMS Rodney.....

    LOL do they.. I forgot.. show how much i know......
  4. T0byJug

    HMS Rodney.....

    If i remember correctly WG have issue modeling spotter plane on top of turrets.
  5. T0byJug

    When will Siegfried etc arrive?

    OWWWW if the Slava won the fight... It was DEFIANTLY ME.....
  6. T0byJug

    When will Siegfried etc arrive?

    Maybe...
  7. T0byJug

    When will Siegfried etc arrive?

    No idea at all.. I don't get any more information than you.
  8. T0byJug

    When will Siegfried etc arrive?

    I ment Darling or would you prefer honey?? or Schatz,chéri,tesoro,querido.....
  9. T0byJug

    When will Siegfried etc arrive?

    Im Spelling or Lack off, is here to Entertain you darling
  10. T0byJug

    When will Siegfried etc arrive?

    We have to test her first.. Depending on that test.. I've tested ships just once before release. Some ships have been through as much as 4 test iterations to get them to a balance that War-gaming want. Its just two Early to tell. Could be one patch it could be half a year. @NoobySkooby Indomitable.. The last round of testing in that CV the stats stayed on ST accounts in the stats (dont judge her by my stats I struggled with her) something that douse not usually happen with test ships. This would suggest in game files she has status of released.. even though you cant buy her. So i would surmise she will be here soon. @piet11111 I'm exited about the Friesland as well and am stoked about getting her to test tomorrow.. We ST's will endeavor (corrected) to get here ready for release ASAP.. EDIT FTFY
  11. T0byJug

    ranked battle ship experience LOST!!!

    A hint then mate.. The forum will help you.. But come to the forum and say i'm confused. Wargaming make a lot of mistakes and this forum is full of threads with many long term and high throughput forum contributes complaining. But we will tend to defend WG when something is clear. Where the XP went is clear to the vast majority of the forum and indeed the community. come and polity ask a question the this forum is FULL of people that will be very helpfull. come and blame and complain your likely to get a more hostile response. your comment in the post above is what you need to do Simple words. I'm confused or I misunderstood Also WELCOME TO THE FORUM
  12. T0byJug

    ranked battle ship experience LOST!!!

    All Ship XP will be on. following ships
  13. I would say defiantly no.. If you play a lot and have Prem time yes you credit surplus can be huge.. But if your a non prem player its already a struggle I know many players that have unlocked ships they cant afford to buy. Me im very much ok.. I run prem consumables on ALL my ships even LOW tier. I have over 60 AA modules in my stores removed from CV rework i cant be bothered to sell and have 452,249,224. credits But its only really players like the old hats that have almost always been Prem time that have that sort of funds.
  14. T0byJug

    Submarines

    Accept there slow so not good at scouting and at periscope depth you would have to limit there spoting range. Somewhat like being in a storm
  15. T0byJug

    Submarines

    Your trolling right? Radar Rocket planes Dive bomber that still take half the health of a DD Hydro to detect Torpedoes Removal of stealth Fire. DD players have had to adjust there game play SOOOO many times when changes were made that effected DD players more than any other class. This is the last 2 months but it has been pretty much the same since Launch. DD's are the hardest Ships to do well in.. There is a reason why at both Low and High tier Number of games played in BB or CA/CL outstrip DDs brought to battle by a large margin. I noticed in a thread from a few weeks ago you stated SO MANY DD's Around.. Sorry but this is just not the case from the numbers above at high tiers BB=41% of ships in battle CA=33% CV=6% A HUGE increase from before rework where it was around 2% DD=19% Out of interest Ships tier VI to X BBs make up 28.5% CA/CL 35% CV 7% DD 29% so if all ships had Equal difficulty we would expect DD/BB to have about the same representation in the game and CA/CL to be a higher. but this is not the case. Im intrigued. Un hide you account lets see how much DD gameplay experience you have.?
  16. T0byJug

    Submarines

    First Welcome to the forum Ok submarines. Most players don't want them.. (ok ok many don't want CV ether). Did submarines alter the war at sea. Yes Did they Alter naval warfare in this time period. I would say no not really. This is a game about Fleet actions Submarines were to slow to take part if fleet action. They were just not used. Submarines did get some notable Warship kills in WW1 and WW2 but they were ships sunk in transit NOT in battle Other reasons not to have them. Destroyers in game already have too many roles they are expected to perform with out adding anti submarine to that as well. submarine warfare is slow and time consuming.. I don't think it would work in a fast paced arcade. Submarines is a lone player game not a team game.. Even the WW2 Wolfpacks Subs still acted alone.. They were just Vectored in to at target area infront of the convoy an dthey attacked when the convoy came past. But they still conducted there fight alone. I can only really think of one role where Subs effectively worked with a fleet.. and that was when US navy sent them off the cost of islands the fleet were going to do an air strike on. The subs were used to recover shot down pilots. Submarines are cool for events and would be interesting in Operations (on the AI side).
  17. It was a good game and we did well.. I took one for the team....
  18. T0byJug

    Georgia/Ohio topkek thread

    I Can confirm this from my testing/playing.. one warning.... 6 barrels of very accurate guns can hurt if you mess up you aiming... there is no dispersion to give you some hits when your aim is off..
  19. T0byJug

    Georgia/Ohio topkek thread

    If you want anything that is there at the moment use the coupon.. you lose it in a week.. Or rather a new one is issued on the 23 of this month.. BUT you can only have one at a time...
  20. T0byJug

    Georgia/Ohio topkek thread

    thats the point steel/Free XP ships tend to ignore class and cost about the same for as the other ships for the tier.. look at Kronstadt/Missouri Mushi all 750k free XP (if i remember correctly)
  21. T0byJug

    Georgia/Ohio topkek thread

    I think the mistake for Neustrashimy is people compared her to Black.... we cant really do this as Black was steel costed in accordance to the steel they give from Ranked battles. Neustrashimy steel cost was more inline with the other tier IX steel ships
  22. T0byJug

    Georgia/Ohio topkek thread

    With the 6 test ships i mentioned Odds should be at least 1 or 2 will be coal.. (and no my supertester and quality poster status douse not give me any inside info on this)
  23. T0byJug

    Georgia/Ohio topkek thread

    She is not a bad ship.. I quit enjoyed testing her.. (in the last iteration) will i get her.. not at the moment. Im a DD man We have Benham/Somers/Friesland and Hayate in the pipe line and 2 Cruisers that play like DD (or have DD guns) Colbert and Smolensk.. untill i know what the payment method for them is my Coal stays where it is
  24. T0byJug

    Hacks destroying the game

    OK just checked OPs forum profile.. comes to forum posts a whine thread. douse not respond to any of the responses... I detect TROLL.. Lets not feed him
  25. T0byJug

    Hacks destroying the game

    No information no back ground no situations..... Meaningless thread.
×