T0byJug

ok correct i looked at wrong column!

Go Lok here. http://maplesyrup.sweet.coocan.jp/wows/ranking/20160416/eu_week/average_class.html This is last week, high tier is 6+ and BB are most played by over 60%. Also remember there are know 4 CA lines to 2 BB and there are more CA prem ships than BB prem at 6+ so with these newlines and more prem I would expect there to be a few less BB than let's say 4 months ago. Sorry on train and tablet puntuation is lacking I would try DD at max 5 if there are still issues then maybe 4 but defiantly no less. Less than 4 you will see a huge jump in damage and XP avarages by DD's

well you win more in you Yamato!! ........ First Please dont get me wrong when i say arrogant i mean about Dismissing players that dont have Tier 10 ships!! tier 8 is high tier. For you playing skill be as arrogant as you like you are very good so you have every right to be arrogant. Now lets talk about your comment in Bold!! In the context of what I was saying. Restrict DD to 3 a team will make the 9 ships be BB/CA (I say this because CV's are very under played at top tiers). I said CA's will disapier as Players get fed up of being killed by Crits from the higher volume of big gun BB's in game so will stop playing CA and play BB instead! making BB the most played Ships by a long way in game. Well it will be those average pleb drags that make up a the vast majority of the player base that will go to BB. So i believe my statement will stay true. DD's will stay at max number (3 per team)! as limiting the number of DD's in a match is better for the DD player. The Good Players that like CA will stay playing CA (how many Good players are there out there?) The rest will levitate to BB. so we will go to games with a very high BB count! so World of battleships. I want what is good for the game not what is good for me. Limiting DD's to 3 is way to small. That would be great for me as a DD player. Im more scarred of DD's finding me than almost any other class, CVs are a pain but there are just not many out there. I will say it again! what needs to be done is fix the issue of Variance. 2 DD on one team and 6 on the other is wrong and makes for a very imbalanced match. especially in dominations games. another thing they should do is restrict DD's in a division no more than 2 DD and maybe force them to be iferent Classes of DD (so no division with 2 Shimakazies) This veriance should be about 30%-50% so if a team has 6 DD the other team will have at least 4. A Team has 4 DD other team has 2 or 3 at a minimum

God you are an arrogant person. We have worked out you don't like stats. But the stats do not support you here. and sorry mate but due to lack of players playing tier ten! tier 8 ships are often in matches with tier 9 and 10 ships! Very often. What is fact! YOU dominate BBs in high tiers because you are a CA player and you are very good at them! but the overall stats show a different story. Also unless a CA gets a torp strike! (so only jap CA) there is very little chance of a CA getting a devastating strike on a BB. The reverse is not the same. Good players will stay with there CA's the average Joe will go BB as its the easiest ship to do ok in! more so if there are Less DD. I like the way no one pics up on the main issue with DD in matches at tier 7+. Its when one team has 1 or 2 DD and the other team have 5 or 6. when DD's on both teams are approx the same you have a DD skirmish at the start! and the team that Supports its DD's tend to win this fight.

Yep 3 DD per team great idea! Max 2 CV average at moment in tier ten is inder 0.5 per match. so you will be effectively getting 9 ships made up of BB and CA. Very Very quickly CA's will disapeir. As BB's will own the CA's so People will stop playing Cruesers as they will be fed up of BB's citadeling him. Also most DD players will love Low DD count! as they will be in a low risk high target environment. sorry you have not though this through. The main issue with DD's is the team Disparity! matches where there is 1 DD on 1 team and 4 or 5 on there other! Then there is a problem

ment tier 4 commander skill not tier 4 ship

Fire starter is good for CA at tier 4 and ok Fro a BB but yes AAand secondary range increases 1st choice

Not all skills are supposed to be good for all types of ship! yiu have multiple skills for BB and CA at tier 4. OK DD commanders the skills make more impact than any other class

But ist a DD skill! BBs and CA use AA or secondary or Firestarting skill

Skills are not supposed to be for all class of ship! s Expert is a DD skill! on a BB it wouldbe OP if it gave like 20% more XP

Thisis a game matric in ships and tanks! If they allowed you to do this. There would be to many low tier ships with uber high commanders

Now thats taking border HUGGING to a hole new level.....

Let me be you first subcriber!! good luck with your channal

MMMM unrealistic is not quite true! German airforce (Luftwaffe) used a tacktick like it, Late WWII against US bomber formations A US President has also used it to great effect to kill large formations of alien Fighters...

Mate stop being so argumentative! there will be good and bad players playing this ship so the stats after a week or 2 will give a faily good idea of what the ship will be like. I am not saying she is good or bad i am waiting till next week. Personally i hope she is good i want a US CV with torp planes and fighters. the only ship i will buy the second she is out is HMS Cambeltown

Look again at my earler comment I said before we all judge the ship wait till at least next week before we condemn her and then have a look at the stats 15JG52Adler, on 14 April 2016 - 01:45 PM, said: And stats are herehttp://warships.today/vehicle/3763320816/eu/SaipanSmall sample. 1700 games.But it is holding very good. So even after such a short time she is holding out well

But this is not the issue in the Siapan! Its available to all in the shop... so if the stats are comparable to other tier 7 CV we can be pretty sure she is ok

But in doing that she kept a huge amount of the Royal navy out of the pacific ocean assisting the USN. A fleet in being can still be dangerous. A few years ago i went Portsmouth Historic naval dockyard was on HMS Warrier and there was a group asking what the point of such a ship was since she never fired her guns in anger. I heard this and answered. For teh bulk of her carrier there was no other ship in teh world capable of facing her or her sister ship in battle.

Here's a Noval Idea!! why dont we wait till next week before we condem the ship! Personally Its in the shop for 17 days! I will wait till next week when she will be stats! take a look and see how she douse

Ok i am surprised that HE caused that Detonation But saying that my statement holds. those Shells landed in a the area of the Forwould turrets and whats directly under the turrets! the Magazine. I would guess in the instance of that Gif The Udaloi had the luck of Finding some Error in the ships armour module. Patch notes for World of tanks are full of fixes to armour models where the left a location with 0 armour by mistake. So why not ships as I guess there armour models are a lot more complicated That said why should there not be a Vary small chance of a detonation. after all it can happen that AA shells on deck or something causes a chain reactions The most obviase answer to that gif any way is some Sprit(ly) Turret crewman left the turret door open and a shell passed through the open hatch. Hit a byte of the cordite bag that fell down the ammo hoist in to the Magazine!!

LOL you think you lower MTM78 win rate!!!! You still in traing after me old chap!!! Looking forwould to seeing you after those RL issues are sorted! we will troll MTM together

MTM78 often plays Higher teirs with the rest of us but if you are with EsaTuunanen its tier5 and the gremmy!

well Ammo racks happen in world of tanks and that seems to do ok in E sports. Also detonations are not random.you must hit the area of the magazine. then there is a chance of a Detonation.

LOL. Was just about to say she looks british

Sorry Mate but I had to giggle reading this and looking at you profile name!!!!