T0byJug

Well you have a lot but no where close to all..Not counting French CA/CL there are 188 ships in game +12 ARP/Dragon ships so that makes 200. You have about half. Do I like the changes from last patch NO. Do I think it was necessary NO and do they need to buff DD's in some way to Compensate Yes But DDs are still competitive dispite the change you just have to adapt 8 games in DDs today 7 wins 1 game detonated by enemy DD was place 11 in team tier 3 5 games were tier 8+ all were wins with 10 kills in those 5 games 1 time top of team 1 time 2nd and 3 times 3rd! Had over 475(OK 230 was Gearing) main battery gun hits 18 torp hits. I did about 375k damage.Played Gearing/Fletcher/Udaloi/Yugamo/Z23 Ok i died in 3 of those games Games are harder know in DDs But DD players are Better players we adapt and overcome.. Let the BBabies have there whine.. We feast on there tiers... 4 of the 9 kills were BBs The 2 most important skills now for a DD commander is Last stand and Priority target. Dont lose your engines/Stearing and know how many ships are looking at you so you know when to run.... AFT is useless But the fire gun control systems are still important to mount.. you want to be firing on the big ships at long range. They will still struggle to hit. Some of those tier 8+ games at time i was being targeted by 7 ships

Hope so.. I'm short in German commanders. Russian and IJN I have them clogging up hammocks. After DD split

Most of the missions that needed ramming in the past could be played in Coop. So did it there. Easer to succeed and its PvE so I am being detrimental to the team

I dont see the issue. This time WG have been very clever... Before we had mission that were Kill ships of X nation or y Nation or class of ship.. so people avoid that nation/ship. The mission for the Yamato only is a great Idea. After all getting 2 kills in a Yamato is much easier than the mission to kill the Yamato. Only mistake I think they made is the mission in the Yamato should be repeatable more than 1 time a day. To encourage Players to play there YAmato

No it din not. It said a 12 point captain TRAINED for the Gneisenau. Even the announcement thread says CAPTAIN FOR http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/77160-event-calendar-for-april/ And no mention of a ship. And that post is time stamped Event Calendar for April Started by Tuccy, Mar 31 2017 01:12 PM with no edit stamp

I do all that.. I just do it better in ALL my other DDs and those Sneaky Sea Mines do bugger all when they do hit.... 3 hist on a Warspite 13k damage or today 2 hits on Tier 5 CL Emerald 14K..... 14K MY god a single hit from most of my tier 5 DD do that. Same battle 4k damage on a Fiji with a torp hit

I need some lessens from U cant get sims to work.Guns are pretty good but the TORPS GOD suicide ones or ones that are so slow a non moving BB can start his engines and avoid most of the spread.... and GOD they are weak.. they do less than 2/3 the damage of a tier 5 DD

you leave DDs alone thay have been crapped on enough with out CV joining in

What do you expect.. She was Flagship at Battle of Tsushima where the IJN beat the Russian Fleet that had travelled from St Petersburg .... Where is World of warships Dev Office again....

Logged a ticket.. WG responded they are aware and working on it

Here https://gamemodels3d.com You have to Subscibe to get stats but it only cost about 2 Euro for life.. Well worth it

Katori is a beast. Only thing that stops her being OP is her speed

I bought a Regular Forum contribute the Cambeltown as a gift as he was mad about her.. And Kept on and on about her history. It was so entertaining i said i would gift him her when she came out.. The Boy was proud and said he could not accept the gift unless he bought me something... Guess what he got me ........ Taken her out 4 times a wopping 12k average damage

Here it is From here http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/31444-some-interesting-info-from-ru/page__st__4740__p__1739919#entry1739919

Im sure i read on a thread yesterday that there is an event that should be announced this week for a new Campaign that will cover ALL servers. AS people were asking if the current ones for the Shinonome would stay up.. Maybe this is it. Will have a quick look to see if i can find the post

EsaTuunanen this thread is about should we be offered refunds for ALL prem ships because of this change. Which i say no as its a global change. It effects all DD non prem and prem alike. Do i agree with the change NO I think this Sledgehammer change they have done is completely wrong. at the same time as Nurfing almost every DD in game both prem and non prem to fix what was essentially a non issue to any one but a few loud BBabies.. Its nothing but a significant Nerf to DDs while yet again Buffing what is already the easiest to play and strongest class in the game the Battleship. DD's should definitely have been compensated and BBs Nurfed to correspond to this. The most popular suggestion seems to be a reduction in DD bloom time and an increase in BB bloom time. The fact that a ship that rely's on stealth to survive spend so long spotted after firing while a BB can actualy stealth up between shots is just stupid. What I am saying is this scream of I want a refund on Ship X or Y every time they make a change to the game will stifle the game development. God we even get people demanding refunds for NON prem ships because the idiots Free XP to tier X with Dubloons and then realise the ship is not as good as it was when reviewed (before Release) by some youtuber

And if wargaming tried this and called it a Global change. I would be calling out Wargaming as much as the rest of you.

Niibler I have liked our Sparing as we have kept it civil.... If you are ever in Germany and Close to Frankfurt let me know i will buy you a good German beer.. I will also Agree to Disagree...

But again BOTH your examples mean nothing as they are changes to 1 ship NOT A GLOBAL CHANGE THAT EFFECTS ALL SHIPS IN GAME..... Do i think the change is wrong Yes. Do wargaming have the right to do this YES, are the legally Wrong, NO. Is it morally wrong not to offer use a refund.. MMM thats a little Gray.. But i cant see how they can offer refunds and still develop/Improve the game. Only possible way is as i said before. Give matches a value so players like me that played the Blys to death have no refund. and if they do give refunds Block players from buying the ship again.(to protect from opportunistic Exploitation)

well if i am so wrong.. take them to court.. See how well you do.

so what ship do you want a refund on your Gremyashchy.??... Simple fact is this is a game. WG own the intellectual Property of that game. IF you had paid for the game or ships in the game and then they made it pay to play.THEN you would legally be able to claim a refund as they have fundamentally changed how you can access your Purchase. But there is no Law that says WG have to give you a refund if they change game mechanics As the owner of the property they are well within the LAW. Also if what you are saying is correct Microsoft/Apple cant make changes to there OS No company can make changes to there software.. Really MMMMM dont think so

But also As A Blys player.. 340 games in her.. The lack of invise fire I dont think is a big change.. Ok i still need to take her out and yes i removed AFT from her I think the change is wrong believe me. I truly think it should have been counted with a reduction in DD bloom time. to lets say 10 secs.. We should be concentrating on convincing WG that DDs need some sort of Buff to counter this change that is a huge buff to BBs in every way. Not screaming for refunds or saying WG should make this bloom change not effect prem DD. God they did that with the E25 in Tanks. I love my E25 but doing that is just wrong. This change effects ALL dds and should effect Prem and non prem alike

Even if it is game braking???? And no you know me I don't think Invise fire was in any way game braking. All I am saying is Globel changes to game do not warrant Refunds. I believe this change was bad. But wargaming cant develop the game if they have to fear any change will result in them giving money back to players. The only solution would be to stop developing the game. Do ANY of use want that? despite the changes to DDs i am still primarily a DD player