T0byJug

Ok lets look at RN ships from Leander Upp (no one argues that the lower tier RN ships are a little crap) You can Filter by different stats but for this example i will filter by XP and I will filter by last 2 weeks and by class Warspite 2nd of 7 Leander 7th of 10 Fiji 5th of 15 Edinburgh 5th of 10 Neptune 1st of 5 Minotaur 1st of 5 RN ships are solid performers. So please where is this Anti RN bias

delaci76, on 25 April 2017 - 09:15 AM, said: "Why does WG seem to ignore certain Historical facts about RN ships i.e gun range in lieu of things like health buffs/smoke" (again some people care about Hist accuracy etc. I think it ties in with immersion.) Again showing you lack of knowledge. RN ships used a Optical Range finder in WW2 where you had 2 images of the target that you allined over each other to make one image. This was extremely accurate at short and mid ranges, however it suffered at longer ranges or in bad conditions The stereoscopic system used by the Germans was better at longer ranges. In WW2 German Naval Gunnary was better at longer ranges than the RN could manage.

This statement alone shows you have no idea what you are talking about. 1 she was released to commemorate one of the most epic sea born attacks of WW2. 2 yes she is not British. this enabled WG to give us a ship quickly and easly. 3, Cambeltown is the best DD at tier 3 bar non outperforming the other tier 3 DDs in EVERY stat. Guns are not the best for the tier but she is defiantly not the worst. The Long range and HUGE launch ark of the torpedoes make her an epic torpedo Boat way outperforming the Wakitaki. If you struggle with the Cambeltown its all you mate not the ship. The ship is a beast. As for the Leander. She is a solid Middle of the road Ship. As for Hood Yes she is bad.. But I have been saying for a long time if they make her factually correct. She would be very hard to balance and make a good ship as she did not have any of the refits she so sorely needed. Personaly I was never realy thrilled with the idea of HMS HOOD being in the game.

Dont use an All time Rate use the shorter period if you want to make this type of comparison.. Tirpitz when released suffered from low commander skill points as she was the only German ship in game. Look at 2 weeks and those %s drop down by half. I think some sort of buff was needed for the Tirpitz. But is should have been Done Gradually. As if this makes Tirpitz OP there is very little they can do as she is a Prem ship,

I think it was me that got Blues in trouble in the first place. My average XP tell you I was pretty high or top of my team most games. But Easter weekend could i get a win? could I buggery. Saturday/Sunday i dropped to 30%.

LOL in in game mission Please how is it braking any EULA laws. Blimey school playground lawyers.. As for the jump in wins.. Its all match rigging mate. After a abysmal weekend Blue team got placed in winning teams last night. Note last 7 day win rate and then look at last night

swap out skills.. come on how many players have a dedicated Tirpitz commander.. Most will be using a commander from another German BB Hydro is so amazing. Gives you a few seconds extra torp notice for about 1/3 Of the match. As for you last comment. I have said AGAIN AND AGAIN a buff was warranted. But not such a large buff in one go. Because unlike a non prem ship they can't take it away again if it proves to be to much as she is a prem ship and nerfing prem ships is a problem. ​People have been keen to point out if you are within torp range of a Tirpitz you have messed up. Well if you are 4.4 km from a DD smoke cloud in a BB it could be said you have realy realy messed up.

No one is saying she is OP at the moment.. What makes the Bismark so great is her secondary's. This buff makes the secondary's the same. + torps.

Good point I forgot the 37mm on Tirpitz are single shot guns.. On the Bismark they are a later hopper fed 37mm gun with a LOT higher rate of fire. As I said the secondery's needed a buff. But i truly believe it was to much to fast. Problem is if its to much of a buff (and i think it is) they cant reverse it as she is a prem. A gradual increase over a few patches would have been a much better idea.

come on 7km Secondaries was unnecessary..Normal WG approach Use a sledgehammer when a chisel was needed. A secondary Buff was needed but to same as Bismark in 1 stop was not. they could have gone to 5.5 or 6, see how it goes and then Buff again if still needed. Bismark is a very very powerfull ship. Bismark/Tirpitz Same main armament Secondary know the same. AA Unless i am mistaken Long range AA Aura Tirpitz is actually slightly better over Bismark (Slightly better DPM) if not its the same Mid range Bismark a little better and close range Bismark stomps on Tirpitz. But Close range AA is good to kill planes after they have dropped but generally not before. Rest of stats pretty much the same.. Bismark has Hydro and Tirpitz has Torps. People say Torps are very situational but so is the Hydro. Hydro helps you see those Enamy Torps a little earlier But the Torps give the Tirpitz a Huge Alpha Strike at close range,. Funny thing is the Huge buff to secondary's douse Negate the Torps somewhat as know the Enemy Ship is likely to have died to the secondary's before she is in torp range. And to save your time checking my profile Tirpitz is my most played BB after the Arkansas Beta. I like the Tirpitz and will benefit a lot from this buff.. But it was to much to fast. @valrond "Only in these forums whiners would whine for a LOGICAL, REALISTIC and HISTORICAL change. ." This is irrelevant. Being a Prem Tirpitz is modeled at a POINT IN TIME. I believe in some research i did a while ago to a state she was just before she was deployed to Norway in 1942. Bismark However is configured in game as a tier 8 and as such they have Buffed her AA to a state that she probably would have had Late war if she had survived(Pretty Much the same as Tirpitz had by 1944) this could also count for the higher Secondary range due to more advanced Gun direction by late war. Prem Ships are Generally Made Historically correct (if they existed) Would they have been better making Bismark a Prem. Probably. BUT making her authentic for a point in time would have made her Close range AA Aura very very weak for a tier 8 BB (only 12 single 20mm mounts compared to Tirpitz in game 44 20mm in varies mounts)

5.5 or 6 KM would have been good But tend to agree 7km is too much

well its the same as the French light Cruiser Gloire WW2 Dazzle paint I guess thats where it comes from. But yes its not nice

Ok But what tier do you put the Launched ship? tier 9+ prem ships/Tanks are reward vehicles. Yes Missouri was a reward ship.. Ok some idiots spent what was it 100 Euro to get her but if they Did.... As for the Kutuzov. she was indeed a 1950s ship but here main armament is 1938 vintage not some Auto loader. Her AA/Secondaries are Late guns but there not the main armament so its not so much of an issue, The Main armament on the De Grasse are firmly placed in the 50s to late for a tier 8 prem.

thats the issue.. I think they should have 1 separate slot per ship for modifications. Then it would be nice. But for most of them it's not worth it for what you must give up

your lucky almost put my fist through screen.. Just got a SC tonight. I tend to get a few a week.. I got to rank 7 in Ranked last season so got 3 Modifications there... (rank 9-8-7). I have sold 2 modification i put on ships and decided i did not want. I have 1 fitted to Shimakazee. In my inventory I have

Ow she is OP. Ok the guns are not that good and she will lose a gun fight. but as a torpedo boat she is in a class of her own PS all go here to MaxxyNLs thread and vote for the camo to be available alone http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/78057-clash-of-the-elements-kamikaze-r-camo/ This kind of thing has worked before lets see if it will work again

New Ships take time to develop.. I have no issue with ships reterning again and again... lets new players get them.However if there is new nice camo's for them let the players that have her already obtain the camo for less

look atthe picture it has only 1 set

Well I hope its good German Beer you are drinking.

To many Bloody Germans in game i say!! All Germans do is eat sausages, Drink beer and play German Battleships

Maybe not but in a kamakazee its at least consistent. I agree WG Please allow us that already have Kamakazee R to buy the Camo

Yaskaraxx was going to lay in to you for you Thread but you genuinely seem to want to learn.. In game there is a chat channel called Forumites. Log in to it and ask for a division stating you want to learn more about DD play. If i see you there will happily take you out for a few low/mid tier games. IF i am not there are many others there as well. I have over 25DD in port from every nation and every tier 2-10 so I am pretty sure I can find a DD to pair up with you. I am no great player But in last 30days i have had a 60% winrate in DDs over 250 games so i must be doing something right PS you will need some software called team speak and a Microphone and headset

With no water there is also no steam!!!!!

Dont play with SCRUBS we are DD scum.. means u end up in teams with DD

Its nothing to do with being one sided its just competition. Look at a football match 11 v 11. 1 player gets sent of the advantage goes heavily to the team with 11 players still. Each time the team with a less ships losses a boat the advantage goes heavily to the team with the greater numbers. this is why we all remember those epic battles where our team had a 4 or 5 deficit in ship numbers than the enemy and we went on to win Its the nature of team play