22cm

The feed is: We dont care about your feedback, we do what we want anyway. MM is just fine. CVs are fun and engaging. Just dodge. Loot boxes are the best. Russian ships are the cream. We dont play our own game.

You know, this probably means that the amount of active players and money spent in game must be decreasing. The rewards are meant to atract or to retain players.

You don t get it... to get the anniversay containers on my CVs, I equip ramming flag and go for ramming....

Easy, create a independent statistic parameter that adds damage, spotting, capping and defending, and use that instead of experience that relies too much on your team performance

From a tier 10 I have recently unlocked, I got the second premium ship, after Champagne: Ark Royal... and I don t play carriers... I d prefered any other tier 5 crapship, but no, seems like I m collecting all premium CVs...

Except that you would not expect to win with a random team, while WG insists on it.

Best QP was Skybuck Flying...

Not really, WG takes care of it.

Sorry, but lately the winner team is decided by where MM puts less idiots.

No, it is not random at all. WG MM is designed to try to carry all the nubs to high tiers by being carried by decent players, hoping that some of the nubs will pay for content at some point. This is why you never see players under 40% WR, no matter how bad they are. It is much worse after the cost of playing high tiers was reduced. The reward system is flawed.

Very easy to fix this stupid CV class. Remove spotting for the team. A CV only spots for himself. Also, has to burn like normal ships.

You can check my stats in CVs, and those are from before the rework, when CVs were not OP as now and behaved like normal ships. I stopped at lower tiers because it felt like dirty sealclubbing and crap gameplay. I had a game in Mutsuki when it was the tier 6 Jap DD, where all my torp tubes were destroyed early in the game, and it was not a domination game, so no cap zones. So for the rest of the game I could only spot for the team. What kind of plane factory has a CV onboard that can regenerate its planes, while a poor DD has no way to repair its launchtubes (which are, like the name suggests, just some simple tubes, nothing as complicate as a plane, that has to fly) ? Why are CVs more equal than other ships? They dont burn, dont flood, dont lose weapon systems, as in why damaged bombers dont temporary or permanently lose torp tubes like a damaged DD? WG, fix this crapp.

Cant figure out if you re joking or being serious...

No. This was done when the enemy had no CV/airplanes, if he he had, they would protect the bombers against the enemy fighters or the ships against enemy bombers (at Midway bombers were sent without fighter escort, fighters were defending the CVs). And in game is always CV against CV.

Maybe play some games. You talk too much and useless. 9 k posts, 6 k battles.

Those 2 are fine, CCs are wrong.

Maybe wg finally understands: no CV fixed = no money.

Just a friendly reminder to keep your money safe.

Exactly. At least before this, some premiums like Atlanta, Texas, Kii, etc, coud defend against CV.

Please read in history CVs is the most flammable ship. Carries 2 types of fuel, naval and aviation fuel, more fuel than any other type of ship. Aviation fuel burns the best.

Please buy a premium only to be crapped on by tier 6 or 8 CV. Luckily, does not meet tier 10 CV.

Nope. I dont pay money anymore. No more spending from me to fund a game that has an invulnerable class. Fix CVs if you need money.

You still don t get it? The problem of this game is the endless of noobs in your team that you have to carry. If a decent player feels the need to buy a ship for historical reason or because he is an anime fan, fine. I prefer him in my team than a potato in Kamikaze or Genova.

In my team I prefer a decent player in Viribus or Yahagi to a random player in Konig or Furutaka. Case closed.

Nah. You missed the point. Maybe it dont like it personally, but you d rather have a Viribus or Yahagi in your team than another one.