22cm

Then what is the point of buying premium time? Good players should break even without premium time even on a defeat, while bad players should break even on a defeat using premium time. Also, this is what WG wants: more cretins to buy bundles (nobody should be offended here, I bought bundles too).

The game was rushed, it was not ready for launch and we can all see that. My feeling is that someone from WGs management decided it s about time to cash in WoWS, and it is in line with the milking, bundling, not-unifying the accounts and all the other crap WG is serving to their players. On the long run, it was a bad decision, WG is acting as if it was decided that this game will not last more than 1-2 years.

Last minute update: for EU, it will come with bundles.

That s nothing, but they already got Marblehead for free, and Murmansk for 1 dollar, which are good ships.

Lol. so now EU is truly the worst server.

You re probably right, don t expect Warspite ot Tirpitz in bundles cheaper than 50 euros, guys, not even on Christmas.

You don t understand, people want to buy the premium ships, but not in ripp-off bundles. The Mikasa bundle was a slap in the face for EU, because NA gets it for free/stamps.

I am afraid the biggest competition and threat for WoWs is it s own marketing department, at least for EU. Nope, because I never had any proposition on how exactly to nerf CVs, never played them enough for that, too boring and with a Civilisation 3 - like graphic. When I was playing CVs late at night, I was faling asleep, FFS! I was only showing, using statistics, that they were OP as hell and needed to be nerfed.. CVs were always boring, people were playing them because they were OP.

What you ll get is more bundles for Christmas.

Do you rememember when we were arguing about carriers and I said WG will nerf the crap out of carriers, because not only they were OP as hell, but they were ruining the gameplay for all other classes?! I was proven right.

It would be hard to explain how you sell on EU for 20 euros what you give away on NA....

Looks like I was not making up those numbers, as it was suggested.

Does not matter what the price are, they are force feeding them dubloons and other useless crap in bundles with Murmansk, Atlanta and Atago!

KM and RN are at disadvantage here in this game because their main effort was on the submarine/anti-submarine warfare.

Being a ST matters not. What it matters is that you attack the person, not his arguments. Someone here mentioned "ad hominem", it s in Latin, google it up to see what it means. Basically, when you can not counter someone s arguments, you attack him as a person. "You re right, but you re fat/ugly/noob/badplayer/sealclubber/walletwarrior/whatever" It just happens that the 2 persons that went "ad hominem" in this discussion were both supertesters.

No, he s probably just a uninformed new player, probably the main target lately of the WG bundle rip-offs. I was thinking WG will not sell even a single Mikasa bundle, but they sold at least one,

Again, supertesters attacking the person and not his arguments. That just sucks, but you guys don t get it.

And the ones who s job it is, don t do their job.

You do have a point, but he is playing on premium time, that is the major concern. For example, even if you loose a battle on tier 10, with premium time you should break even, no gain, no loss of credits. On tier 10, premium time only influences the credits, not the XP because there are no more ships to research (only some modules on some ships). What s the point of buying premium time when you reach tier 10, then?

Who ever this is about, is very simple: when you can not counter his arguments, counter him as a person. Breaking the no naming and shaming rule, also. Supertest coordinator, even.

Lol, you have gone this low? Thats a lowest low, lol. To dig my stats in order to combat me as a person because you can not not combat the arguments? Naming and shaming when you have no other arguments? You suck. A lot. Big time. If you re talking about me, because I m not even going to take the effort to count my battles in a ship, Umikaze was one of my favorite ships, and I played it a lot in the OBT and the first month of the release, because, in my opinion, Umikaze is stll the best torp destroyer in game due to the lack of CV and planes at low tiers. And at that time, everytime you went higher (higher meant tiers 4-5 then, lol) there was already one CV (many guys were powerleveling CVs back then). And because those were experienced alfa/beta CV captains and usually one vs zero or two vs one, on tiers with no AA to speak off, game sucked hard for non CV players. But let me state again: you suck.

Maybe I was misunderstood, so that is why I am quoting myself now. I am not enjoying the continuous decline of this game. Unlike WoWp, this game still has good chances to succeed, if WG changes its policy: - Unify the bloody accounts. If players from WoT switch to WoWS, they will still be WG customers, and you don t want to loose them to other companies games. - Equal treatment with NA server at least. - Campaigns to attract new players and to retain the veteran players.. - Fix the economy on higher tiers and the impact of premium time: when using premium time, even if u play like an [edited], you should not loose money even on tier 10. - Too many changes on the game meta that are annoying the players, the game is already launched, you should not have rushed the launch if the game was not ready. - Stop the damn bundles.

You do realize that going from 40k to 23k in 2 months is even worse than going from 45 k to 23k in 5 months?!

Same.