22cm

You do realise these 2 sentences contradict each other?!

There is also the 3rd group, who wants CVs to be buffed, to be again on the 1st place out of all 4 ships classes, which is also wrong. I am tired of repeating this over and over, it is bad for the game and the gameplay to have an OP class who can dominate all classes. It does not matter which one is the dominant class, CVs or BBs or whatever, it s just bad.

I think there was a gun called Big Bertha, so why not?

That would be my guess too, something like 79.99 and 99.99.

He provided more than enough, he had 2 premium tanks that he bought : "asking me to give them the info of my card transactions, which I provided"

I have the screenshots of 2 6 kills games: And a crazy Mutsuki (crappy ship) game, the XP is obviously a x3 multipliyer, but check the creds (300 k creds, 9k exp with the crappy Mutsuki):

Lol.

Lol, the same scrooges who bundled a tier 6 ship for 50 euros? No way, it will be more.

To remove the mirror MM and the other restrictions, CVs need to be made DD weak, but they re still stronger than CA and DDs.

Then allow that class to play only team or clan battles, because you ll only get team work there. Edit: And how exactly would you choose that OP class? CV, BB, DD players all would like that their class to be the OP one.

If it comes in a bundle, Atago will win

What I have always said is that a class of ship being dominant over the others is bad for the gameplay and for the game in general. I does not matter if that class is CV or BB or CA. it s just bad.

What I meant is if you think your pictures are funny, don t. So, not over-nerfing CV meant them being still on the 1st place?!

Well, then we can oficially declare WG EU as the crappiest server.

Funny picture,[edited] So 2nd place out of 4 is overnerf now?!

At least they could make it available to buy in a bundle for EU.

You re right, but you re wasting your time. What you have here are some CV players unhappy that their OP ship was nerfed, so it s no longer on the 1st place. The funny thing is that it s now on the 2nd place out of 4, but they re not happy until it s again on the 1st place, which will probably never happen again.

Actually it was more because of this.

It s not only the nerf, it s also the mirorred MM, at least for high tiers. Before, the higher the tier, the bigger the chance for a CV to be the only CV in the game. Now you must wait until MM has another carrier same tier for ballance.

It feels like the Beta test was the real game, and this is a sort on improvised "give me all your money fast" sequel.

Nope, the rock-paper-scissor thing was designed and it worked when there were no carriers in the game, before carriers were even introduced. So carriers only complicated the rock-paper-scissors idea, because they could sink all the 3 other classes, even full AA CA if they could afford to loose many planes, and high tier carriers not only could, but would prefer to do it( because it was faster to launch new planes) Thats why CVs were OP. And even after the nerfs they still perform better than CCs and DDs. Wake up, CVs were not over-nerfed and stop dreaming they will ever again be brought to the same OP level they enjoyed in the past.

It was designed like That s exactly why it was designed like this by WoWs developpers.

Why would you say that? The recent Warspite bundle is anything but decent.

Actually in WoWs you experience more BS coming from WG. Fixed your -1.