22cm
-
Content Сount
6,377 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
36662 -
Clan
[RONIN]
Everything posted by 22cm
-
Poll about bundles, player spending and the reputation of Wargaming EU.
22cm replied to MrFingers's topic in General Discussion
Nah, check my topic, you can t really pretend you did not see it. Oh, but i dont play the game anymore, except a few PvE, so you may rejoice, your wish is fullfilled. But your dear WG still sends me emails (I blocked them btw), because I was a big spender. How do you dare to go against your master s wish and wish me gone? Maybe if WG, whom you so dearly defend, did more polls like this one, those players would not have left -
Also, like in WoT, I m afraid you will not see any bad Russian ship in this game, even if they did not really have a navy.
-
Poll about bundles, player spending and the reputation of Wargaming EU.
22cm replied to MrFingers's topic in General Discussion
May I remind you that half of the initial playerbase already vanished? Do you have any ideas why? -
Any ship sucks when stock. Play a few PvE to familiarize with the ship and get some exp to unlock some modules, or use some free exp for modules. Edit: and there is a section called "Ships" on this forum, where at "Cruisers" you should have opened this topic, or find old topics about Furutaka.
-
A bit strange, 24 k, a bigger number today, Sunday. Well, I m gonna make an average and say over 22 k maximum active players for this weekend
-
Well, if you guys did not notice the new pay to win WG policy regarding premium ships (or tanks, too)... The "weaker than its non-premium counterpart" rule is long gone, now premium ships are stronger than the ones normally available in game, but sold only in expensive bundles.
-
Well, as a RU training ship you also had the option to buy Murmansk, which is better, cheaper and unbundled.
-
Poll about bundles, player spending and the reputation of Wargaming EU.
22cm replied to MrFingers's topic in General Discussion
You re funny, google NEP, New Economic Policy, to see what Lenin what forced to do to foster the economy of the country, which was almost ruined, and you ll be amazed. The minuscule % of players who actually attend the forums, a large proportion of whom, are negative in general about WG products, actually like this game and come here to voice their opinions. The majority % of players who do not attend the forums and dont like WG products just leave the game to play better games. -
Hmm... youre on the right path to be offered the much envied position of super tester.
-
Yes, that s true, the super testers are the closest resembling thing to a WG EU staff that actually discuss with the players, so they are also paying for someone else mistakes
-
Well, it says that the person in charge of wargaming EU's marketing department worked for EA before, which explains everything. And also explains the risk for WoWs to share the same fate as some of the EA online games.
-
Not yet, I woke up late this Sunday. But frankly I don t understand why some supertesters feel that they have to defend WG every time. Make no confusion, you can defend the game if you enjoy it, without defending the WG company, because it s two different things.
-
Nice. How s Yubari these days? Still like a fragile old lady?
-
CV gameplay geting a tad rediculess.(T6-7)
22cm replied to Spellfire40's topic in General Discussion
I m afraid that can t be dropped unless their damage is nerfed to DD level. Even in WoT arty has mirrored MM. -
Agreed, for RU DD line and for the next RU line, which I understood will be CC, Murmansk is a much better training ship than the BB Nikolai, and you can also buy it with dubloons in the in game-tech tree, not in an inflated bundle. Now, of course, it s possible that some super testers to argue the contrary, how good a trainer this Nikolai is for DD captains. .
-
The bearing market is down to 21 k maximum online players, this Friday and Saturday.
-
Actually Blyss is just a ridiculous attempt from WG to milk the Polish players, because there was no intention to introduce the Polish Navy. It s the less recommended premium ship to buy.
-
WG EU should not let it drop below 20k.
-
CV gameplay geting a tad rediculess.(T6-7)
22cm replied to Spellfire40's topic in General Discussion
Don t even get started about real life, in real life navies had like 20-30 DDs for a capital ship (CV or BB), so if you want this game to be close to reality, then give a DD 20-30 lifes and see what happens, or allow in game only 1 CV or BB for 20 DDs. In real life a pack of 20-30 DDs will absolutely wreck any capital ship without escort. Right now, the classes that deserve a buff are CC and DD, not CVs, and maybe a nerf for BB (maybe reduce the citadel hit chance). CVs only need their gameplay redesigned to be made more attractive to play, because their gameplay was always boring. -
CV gameplay geting a tad rediculess.(T6-7)
22cm replied to Spellfire40's topic in General Discussion
Can you answer to a simple question, where is the CV captain location? And what is his qualification, navy captain or airforce pilot? The answer at these 2 simple questions is the major cause of the bad gameplay design for CVs. -
How about don t buy it becausen it s bundled? At the rate this game is loosing players, next year it will be sold at half-price discount.
- 231 replies
-
- 11
-
-
Again, 21 k max number of players yesterday, Friday, and again 21k, almost 22k (21.9k) today, Saturday. I would say the max is around this hour, 08 PM forum time.
-
CCs and DDs are under performing, and it gets worse in higher tiers.
-
Are you guys planning to do something to stop EU being the worst server?!
-
Funny.