22cm

If you put that game in the topic title that way, it s to be expected.

Agreed. Murmansk is better, cheaper, funnier. It is the worst performing premium ship available. All the newest premium ships are for nations with a single class ingame, while US with 4 classes only has Atlanta as a trainer.

When you re looking forward, port is the left side of the ship, while starboard is the right side of the ship. The meaning of the names: Starboard means steering board, because old ships were steered with a hand-held steering oar, and because most people are right handed, this oar was on the right side of the ship because it was used with th right hand. Larboard was used before for port, it means loading board, because when the ship was moored/docked it was with the left side to the dock, in order not to crush the helm, which was on the right side, so the ship was loaded through the left side. However, at some point in the 19th century the Royal Navy considered that the names were too similar and sounded too much alike, so decided that port should be used instead, as the side of the ship that faces the port. Hope you find this interesting.

Sorry, no more bundles, and nerf carriers more!

Not really worth it, I would sell you mine for 20 euros. Can be made to work, if you already have a well-trained captain, which kinda defies its purpose.

Backboard was also used in Old English.

Ships like Atlanta or Yubari should have mirrorred MM, like CVs.

Only 44k in Cleveland, maybe I ll get a better result:

Any cruiser shooting AP also needs seconds to finish off Atlanta, too. Including the tier 5 ones.

Dude, I did good in Furutaka or Mutsuki before they were buffed, but to buy this?! Or Mikasa in a bundle?! Rofl.

Too hard to do good in it, too map dependent (a lot of islands needed), too team dependent (enemy team should have enough DDs or CVs), and on top of this you have to pay for it.?! Lol!

Nah, just bad marketing... Best milking ships are definitely Bismarck and Yamato, unfortunately Yamato is tier 10....

Being a premium ship collector on EU is not a reasonable thing, the bundles will milk you dry.

My record is 140k damage in Arkansas Beta.

Exactly. I mean, for a bundle to have some succes, you need a famous ship to attract people. Why was Krapuzov famous?

I went back to stock torps on Hatsu, even if they are slower, because of the slighly faster reload and because I got the strange feeling those are stealthier than the upgraded ones...

Well, according to the maplesyrup database, last week on EU, 1.2 k+ players played Kutuzov. How is this popular enough?

Are you eating 60 euros burgers?! http://www.telegraph.co.uk/foodanddrink/foodanddrinknews/11143554/Chef-creates-worlds-most-expensive-burger-cost-1100.html

They stack. If 10 as you asked (not in game though) it gets 14.

^ Maybe the reviewers are from Asia or NA and they did not buy it in a bundle?!

I think I can officially declare that the Kutuzov bundle was a huge fiasco for WG EU, last week Kutuzov was played only by 1200 players (according to the maplesyrup database), so WG EU cashed only 72 k euros from this ship. Guess what, Kutuzov ain t Tirpitz, and nobody ever heard of it.The noobs from the WG EU marketing should learn to play.

I think I can officially declare that the Kutuzov bundle was a huge fiasco for WG EU, last week Kutuzov was played only by 1200 players, so WG EU cashed only 72 k euros from this ship. Guess what, Kutuzov ain t Tirpitz, and nobody ever heard of it.The noobs from the WG EU marketing should learn to play.

It will be bundled anyway on EU.

I played a lot of PvE because I was pissed because of WG EU, and I can confirm, 100% WR in PvE is not possible. Sometimes your team is worse than the bots.

Yes, you ll probably also be able to buy them in a bundle, it s EU after all.