RuruushuVuiBuritania

Because uniformity is important so that people from Asia can play on any version of WoWs that they like? Or do you think that countries like the PRC just let their citizens play on a game that uses such a symbol? The same reason why for the longest time, we did not have the Imperial Ensign for Germany: someone was opposed to it for long enough to not include it. The Nazi flag is banned by law in most countries in Europe or at least heavily frowned upon, so a stylised version has to be used for German ships.

Slight correction: That is the JMSDF flag, not the national flag. The IJN flag has a darker shade of red. But we can assume that a Japanese military flag is rather acceptable on a non-Asian forum about warships.

That was last auction, which ended up selling for about 25 million credits.

This alone proves that the containers are not rigged... So where are your arguments now?

Would you ever doubt WG?

WG marketing and monetization is definitely devious as always, no doubt about that. I think you could get up to Chumphon perma camo and then Chumphon via the missions, so pretty meagre unless you really want to grind out a line that looks balanced (by that I mean lackluster and bland compared to the common hypebeast lines and premiums of the last couple years)

I would only consider it shady if you could never get these grind ships outside of the event, like the Dockyard. I believe we went from ''play/whale for containers maybe dropping a T8 future tech tree ship'' to ''Get all T5-T7 ships in early access just by playing the game normally''. Was there any situation in the new format where you could get the T8 for free too? Perma camos certainly. The clue is in ''early access'': you are technically not supposed to have them for a while still. You grind the super easy missions? Either play the ships you earned or sell them. You win! Don't spend money on the early access? You win more! Luckily most of the Dockyard ships are not worth the investment and Pan-Asian cruisers look decidedly mediocre enough to ignore. Whales will keep whaling and WG will keep milking, early access buy-ins or not. All WG is doing now is just expanding means of monetization to make them more appealing (or is it appalling?)

What do you expect from a Youtuber who only posts about this because of clicks, not because he wants to inform WG and his playerbase? Would you say that volley firing is always superior to sequential firing because of the bug? Is there a tangible benefit to sequential firing it this worked properly? What can be done to fix this?

Your best is obviously not enough when you are dragging your team down. Paying does not help. I am (was?) a regularly paying customer and my winrate is declining recently despite stats going up overall.

So once again OP makes good his reputation of just shouting bloody murder and making claims that are not true. What a surprise. With such a flair for drama, he puts the ''Greek'' in ''Greek tragedy''.

Why would anyone buy a ship because they specifically have that camo? I have a lot of camos I earned or got from containers belonging to ships I do not have. The only reason you should be able to sell perma camos is to exchange them for a perma camo of the same tier or to get your doubloons refunded. And Fen Yang is in the Premium Shop, but I do not see why anyone would buy it.

You get Research Bureau points for playing T5-10 ships in the line. You lose all ships and research progress in the line and get the sale value of the ships back in credits when you reset a line. You only need to research GK and Khaba once, not even buy them, to get them when the swap happens. You will have to research Preussen and Delny if you want to get those two, though.

If I was such a fanboy, I would not be constantly doubtful and critical of WG.. Bottom tier gives you extra XP and credits. Play well and earn them.

Maybe you should be the top tier BB, then. Although I wouldn't like to have a top tier BB with 148 battles in random...

DDs are OP, naturally. The DD Mafia is real and intentionally holding back the ''real'' good players from excelling in their BBs. So the MM has to be rigged as well.

This is a very nice joke. A CV that cannot hunt DDs might as well be dead weight unless he can use the rest of his damage effectively. Damage against larger ships alone does not equal a win, so the teamplay between the two best players is what carried it.

I'm pretty sure a forum is a place where everyone can have a say. Imagine if I were to ban you from saying something because you are a terrible player. That would not be very nice, would it? So treat others like you wish to be treated yourself. Italian BBs are not bad per se, but there are a lot better battleships in the game. They are not overly concerning unless you get caught off-guard.

Didn't you quit the game in November? Why are you still here to tell us a ship is bad when a good player can make any ship work (unless it is Strasbourg )

We already have those. They are called ''Random Battle teams''.

The game is pay to progress, there is a difference. Maybe the problem is between chair and keyboard?

There is only one CV that works properly against a DD with more than one braincell, and that is Midway. The easiest counter to a DD is staying alert and planning your moves ahead of time, you don't even need a cruiser to neutralise them. WG does everything to protect CVs (because someone has their career staked on them) and BBs (because BaBBies are their largest playerbase). Cruisers are absolutely not unplayable when a BB will eat the damage they dish out but there is a large chance that the cruiser simply dodges the return fire if well-played and positioned.

Just sealclub harder, lmao. What do you think will scare new players off more: MM that they do not get to see until a good amount of wins and tiers in or people that can start to sealclub them as soon as the noob protection wears off?

I'm pretty sure at least one of them did on one of the threads that was posted not too long. Are you running out of arguments are do you genuinely not know?

Yeah, WG will get a lot of new players if you play sealclubbing ships and still fail to carry your team...

Well, I reserve the right to lecture you, because if I were present evidence the same way as you do, I can use the 1200 coal in a single container as proof that it has not been nerfed... You see how circumstantial any bit of evidence is here. You cannot proof it unless you keep a tally of all your containers for the rest of the year. Which someone did and spoiler alert: there were no changes... You would do well to listen more and take advice from other people.