Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

1MajorKoenig

Players
  • Content Сount

    13,110
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    7885
  • Clan

    [DREAD]

Everything posted by 1MajorKoenig

  1. 1MajorKoenig

    Maybe put a limit on amount on BBs in a match WG?

    4 would be enough. No need to blow up waiting times. Same for DDs and voila.
  2. 1MajorKoenig

    Maybe put a limit on amount on BBs in a match WG?

    Are you trolling? If you build a class based game all classes need to be a viable choice. That should be obvious to you. Same if you make a PvP shooter game and everyone plays only snipers. It is bad. At the moment it is a lot of fun driving BBs - but the other classes struggle and it can be frustrating/hard work to achieve anything significant in them. Of course releasing a highly anticipated line lets the player numbers peak. But this is now not a peak anymore it is a permanent situation. And a significant imbalance in class share that needs to be corrected either through making other classes more attractive, BBs less attractive or through hard caps.
  3. 1MajorKoenig

    Maybe put a limit on amount on BBs in a match WG?

    You are right - problem is mostly related to overboarding versatility. Ideally WG would cut AA on BBs down to half and remove hydro etc. plus reduce spotting ability on them. But they won't so a hard cap seems all we can wish for for now.
  4. 1MajorKoenig

    Maybe put a limit on amount on BBs in a match WG?

    Yes. In the beginning the concept was slot based: 1 CV = 1 BB = 2 CA = 4 DD This was put in for a reason but abandoned for the max 2 CV per side rule. Point is that an overboarding BB population is just bad for the game. Even if you abandon any slot thinking some limits would help the game a lot. Having 5 BBs in each Team camping is just silly and a reason why WG needs to put up so many incentives to play high tier at all. A reasonable frame would be (per team): - max 2 CV - max 4 BBs - max 4 DD And it is not the best way but the only way. WG clearly proved that they won't balance the classes in a way they achieve a reasonable share. Don't get me wrong I like BBs but the current state is harming the game .
  5. 1MajorKoenig

    Maybe put a limit on amount on BBs in a match WG?

    The limit should be 4 BBs per side!
  6. 1MajorKoenig

    British Battleship line for 2017?

    Well - once this happens the game will be 2 full years out. If you think of a reasonable cycle it might not be off far. But that doesn't mean the game dies afterwards. There is content easily until 2020 - not counting "filler" stuff like the Russians.
  7. 1MajorKoenig

    British Battleship line for 2017?

    Their main advantage was numerical superiority which won't be the case in WOWS. Knowing WG's track record for anything Brit and their love for gimmicks this release has all components for a major disaster :-) *grabs popcorn*
  8. But exactly THIS would be a good idea!!!
  9. 1MajorKoenig

    British Battleship line for 2017?

    Yea like Battlecruisers in general and it is a truely British thingy. I am not hyped about Renown though. The only thing remarkable about Repulse is that she proved that Battleships were obsolete in WW2. I am not hyped about Hood either but I am kind of looking forward to the impressive money grab weekend she appears in the shop. This will make the Scharnhorst sale look like nothing. @VC: yes, BCs would be a unique BB line and a perfect fit for the RN BB debut. But I agree with you that WG will probably go the "normal" way with battleships. However, what would be uniqu about them other than they would please the RN fanboys? Probably nothing :-)
  10. 1MajorKoenig

    British Battleship line for 2017?

    Bottlecruisers please! That would be more intriguing!
  11. 1MajorKoenig

    Flags on ships in battle

    No. Nope. Nopers.
  12. Saw Babykim in his Shimakaze on the enemy team. It was a rather unremarkable game - rather campy. He got deleted by one of our DDs and we won it but nothing fancy. However always nice to meet a forumite
  13. 1MajorKoenig

    Vorschau 2017

    Die Antwort auf alle Fragen
  14. 1MajorKoenig

    Vorschau 2017

    47 :-)
  15. 1MajorKoenig

    Vorschau 2017

    Diese 41 Zoll Kanonen machen jetzt aber rasant die Runde... :-) Habe ich das richtig verstanden: RN BrancheS? Und 2 Lines für eine Fraktion die bereits ein Premium Schiff hat? Das wären ja schon die 4 die für 2017 angekündigt waren (plus Soviet DD Split)? Was wird es wohl? - RN BBs - RN DDs - MN DDs - MN CL/CA!
  16. Missiles sounds fancy but wouldn't do the game any good I fear. Or maybe it depends on how WG would implement them. T10 is actually the transition into the 50s so simple single launched AA missiles could even work? Mines would be awful as they would discourage movement even further. They might be interesting for a different game but not for this one. Just imagine 10 Yammys/Kurfursts not moving a single centimetre because of imminent mine danger....? Oh wait we already have that minus the mines :-) New ammo type? Hmmm... Hopefully not gold ammo. Don't like that concept at all
  17. 1MajorKoenig

    Vorschau 2017

    @Wade: Ohgottogott!!! Bloß keine Minen!!! Dann stellen auch noch die letzten Beckenrand-Schnarchies die Bewegung ein! Es droht ja "Minengefahr". Zu deiner Lanze, die du durchbrechen willst: ich glaube alle hier im Forum (ich eingeschlossen) sind der Meinung, dass zum Wohle des allgemeinen Spielspaßes Schlachtschiffe aus Sicherheitsgründen hinter der A-Linie auf- und abfahren sollten. Ab und zu die Hauptgeschütze auf 97km entfernte Ziele abzufeuern wird im allgemeinen als ausreichend angesehen. In diesem Sinne - viel Spaß und ich freue mich auf die Franzosen!
  18. 1MajorKoenig

    Dreadnought Era Appreciation Thread

    Looks like Amagi looses her beautiful stock hull with 0.6.0 and is left with this ugly, topheavy and uninspired fantasy hull some pulled out of a very dark place. However there is hope: apparently WG considers bringing tha A-Hull back as a T7 premium ship ASHITAKA with single 610mm torp launchers. HELL, THAT WOULD BE AWESOME!!!
  19. 1MajorKoenig

    Aoba

    AP wurde soweit ich weiß nicht geändert. Aber Aoba soll ja nun eine Permanente Tarnung bekommen. Liebe die Myoko aber habe Aruba behalten - sie macht Spaß bis auf die idiotischen WG-Geradeaus-Torpedowerfer. Hat jemand einen Screenshot von der neuen Tarnung und was die bringt?
  20. 1MajorKoenig

    Dmitriy-Donskoy

    Genau was du gerade beschreibst passiert gerade. Versuche immer noch, die Shinonome Mission zu machen und brauche daher die Module der DDs. Ist für das eigentliche Spiel eher kontraproduktiv aber das ist bei den Missionen halt häufiger der Fall. Das Module /DDs jagen geht ganz gut aber dann feuern halt 6 oder 7 Schlachtschiffe auf einen. In der Regel Kurfürsten und Yammys. Spaß ist was anderes aber die Chappy hat mich eh nicht gepackt und wird demnächst gegen den Donkey getauscht.
  21. 1MajorKoenig

    Permanente Tarnung für Amagi

    Gibt's einen Screenshot von Amagi mit der Tarnung? Sie verliert ja leider den richtigen Rumpf - aber trotzdem?
  22. 1MajorKoenig

    Permanente Tarnung für Amagi

    Auf Mutsu freue ich mich!
  23. SMS DERFFLINGER In her 1918 configuration with tripod foremast as premium. 1) to test the waters for the rest of the German Battlecruisers 2) to see her in her actual configuration without being ruined with fantasy modifications (WG has proven that they can't make proper what ifs so I hope for a historical premium instead!) 3) to save her from reshuffles
  24. 1MajorKoenig

    Ship you have grown to like

    Karlsruhe
×