1MajorKoenig

Easy VC. Firstly these guns are exactly the same as Nagato’s guns. And secondly these guns are overkill against T5 anyway. Even the old Type 88 where more than sufficient at T5 so that hasn’t changed. She is just more useful in T7 and above matches. You are an experienced player - you can easily pull of the same and better results in Nagato, Nelson and what not.

Now that would be nice !

England hatte vor allem VIELE Schiffe, was bei den absolut gesehen geringen Leistungsunterschieden ein riesiger Vorteil war. Die RN hatte bis Jutland allerdings ein extremes Problem - nutzlose AP Granaten. Und obwohl das Problem durchaus bekannt war, hat die Organisation versagt es zu ändern. Wäre es zu einer wirklichen Flottenschlacht gekommen hätte die Grandfleet möglicherweise ein Debakel erlebt. Mit den neuen Granaten hatte die Flotte ihre Überlegenheit zurück. Es gab durchaus bemerkenswerte Entwürfe, vor allem die Queen Elizabeth. Die übrigen sind eher unscheinbar.

WG interpretiert zwar frei aber die Panzerungslayouts sind größtenteils historisch sofern es sich um echte Schiffe handelt. Genau wie die Kanonen & Kaliber.

Haven’t noticed but possibly. She feels so much more consistent now. If you play well you do well and you have an impact on the game. Especially these RN BBs are extremely tasty now.

Mich wundert die fehlende Böschung bei der Mackensen sehr da die Schiffe praktisch leicht verbesserte Derfflingers waren. Auch blieben Turtlebacks bei folgenden deutschen Designs in Mode. Ohne es belegen zu können würde ich von einem Irrtum oder unvollständigen Informationen ausgehen. RE: Spielstil - mein Vorschlag: T3-6: Turtleback-Brauler T7-10: whatever WG wants - Unsinn wird‘s ja doch :-)

Mir gefallen schnelle Brawler

I took the opportunity to take her out yesterday with the brand new shells. The ship is now a pleasure to use. - she has finally very good striking power, just as she should as a glass BC. Damage and impact on the game got up by quite a margin - she is still highly vulnerable which offsets her striking power and gives her a unique flavour / character - the shells allow her to damage even T9s now - not that it is fun to be uptiered to T9 - still not - but at least you can play the game (with the old shells AFK was more dangerous...) All in all - GREAT CHANGE! The ship is great fun now without being OP. THANK YOU :-)

She was very competitive but I don’t understand the nerf either. At T3 balance is kind of ok either way as the absolute differences in capabilities are extremely small. All BBs get the job done. My candidates for a buff: 1) Mogami with 20cm guns to make this version of the ship viable again. 2) Kolberg

Good news for Dreadnought fans: Ashitaka - one of the most elegant of the mighty Battlecruisers received brand new Type 91 AP shells with update 0.7.7! She is now a pleasure to take out :-)

A huge +1 for the new Ashitaka AP shells!!!! I LOVE IT! It makes the ship really fun without making it OP or unfair of any sorts THANK YOU

I just dislike this overall attitude displayed here by some fellows. It makes online communities less enjoyable. Especially these laughable “would-be-smart-boys” who like to pick on everyone and try to make themselves look smarter. I would be curious if these ppl act like this in reality as well? If so they probably don’t have many friends. Anyway - the review by LWM is funny. Not new but still addressing an unsolved issue with the game.

Der russische Heimmarkt hat in der Tat die lauteste Stimme. Da ist nochmal eine ganz andere Nähe zwischen Basis und Devs. Aber danach geht es ganz simpel nach Größe & Zahlungsbereitschaft des Marktes. Und der Deutsche Markt ist tatsächlich einer der größten und ergiebigsten. In sofern versucht WG durchaus die Wünsche der Community umzusetzen (= mehr Geld in die Kasse)

This. How refreshing to see a forumite who is not a socially awkward douche bag.

While there is certainly kind of a peak it is undeniable that a lot more ships have Radar these days. And that is the problem. I think it started with The Radar BB and now entire lines have it. Atlanta got it added, even some other T7s. And all US and Russian cruisers from T8 on.

While I am not a big fan of how Radar got implemented either main main problem are sheer numbers. It wasn’t terrible until you have 4-6 Radar ships against you in each battle. That just sucks. It’s a matter of ruined by overdoing. Heck you even put it on T7..???

Was aber komplett dem Geschäftsmodell widerspricht.

Richtig dicker schwarzer Rauch für die alten Kohle-Eimer!!! Ja zu SMS irgendwas Und: Weltfrieden!

Read it before :-) Very important to read to the end - I was pretty triggered half way through

Indeed. It is the right change for her - really excited to see how that will play out :-)

Hmm komisch. Ich dachte auch, dass Mackensen und Derfflinger das gleiche Panzerungsschema gehabt hätten. Und letztere hatte meines Wissens eine 50mm starke Böschung / Turtelback

I am really happy to see that the announced changes are mentioned in the patch notes for 0.7.7 on the WOWS page !!! Looks like it’s time to dust off the game and get Ashitaka finally going :-)

Sind beide super aber ich mag Gascogne als Schiff noch lieber. Allerdings landest du damit halt permanent als Füller in T10 Campfests. Daher spiele ich sie zur Zeit kaum

This! The whole Tiering / power progression is messed up and I fully agree on Iowa being T10. T9 is an artificial tier.

Not expecting anything. Just telling that this would have been the price for me. Not gonna pay 30€ for that thing.