1MajorKoenig

A Million +1 !!!!

Uuuuuund: Gewinner ist Walther‘s Design „E“! Herzlichen Glückwunsch! @DeadMemories & @Walther_K_Nehring immer ruhig mit den wilden Pferden

Das würde mich auch interessieren !

It would be good to replace the horseshit the fantasy refits on Kaiser, König and Bayern are at the same time with anything remotely credible. I would appreciate if WG keeps improving also the older stuff Cheers

Hast du denn versucht, letzten Freitag zu spielen ..?

Questionable. I own most of these ships and would have bought - say - two black camos. But a duplicate ship? Naaaah... that is a bit too much to ask for. (My guess: WG farms all the “new” buyers now and puts the camos on sale for the normal ships later. Best of both worlds)

Haha touché :-) N.B. even without adding Tosa (it later for that matter) you could easily readjust the current KII with slightly longer ranged secondary guns. It would certainly change her playstyle but I would be all in for it. I love brawling and KII isn’t terrible as is at it. Angled she is quite tankt and the -0.1 sigma shows compared to Amagi - encouraging closing the distance a lot of times (against TX BBs .... :-(

These were Nelson‘s 40.6cm guns which were particularly bad. Essentially a very poor copy of Baden’s guns but without her strengths. The RN considered these guns a failure themselves and reverted back to heavier slow shells with Lion’s 40.6cm guns. And YES, the G3s were considered Battlecruisers and are pretty much the follow up design to the Admirals. There was even a Battleship version of this design called “N3” - but rumour has it that these N3s only purpose was to scare other nations into a naval treaty as the worn out British postwar economy wasn’t even remotely able to build both the G3s and N3s in a reasonable time frame. It is widely considered a clever bluff.

Maybe a new niche for her once long range AA gets slaughtered :-)

Also die Hoffnung auf eine realistische Tarnung für die PEF hatte ich nie zumal es ja eine fiktive 1930er PEF ist. In sofern finde ich jede weitere alternative Tarnung erstmal interessant für die Abwechslung. Eine vernünftige Hochseeflotte-Tarnung wäre natürlich die Königsklasse aber WG interessiert sich im allgemeinen nicht besonders für historisch korrekte Tarnungen irgendwelcher Art, bzw. man kann die historisch korrekten oder inspirierten Tarnung an wenigen Fingern abzählen. Zum Glück gibt es dafür ja noch Mods Andere Frage: gibt es irgendwelche neuen Testberichte? Sie ist formal noch im Test meine ich aber ich habe keinerlei Tests mehr gesehen und demnächst soll sie ja veröffentlicht werden ?

Yea J3 would be a solid alternative to Admiral at T8 - you are right. I like G3 somehow but “fun” playing her would certainly depend on turret traverse...

Or Queen Mary - due to her tragic fate

I didn’t mean to implement the Incomparable (whether that was a real design or just a sketchy joke is debatable). I was much rather proposing to take G3 for T8 (she has Nelson’s guns) and Name her “Incomparable” - since I love these RN-over-the-top names ;-) Proposed names for the actual G3s are eg. Invincible but as I would prefer that name on the very first Battlecruiser I was making up a name. Other hilarious names are: “Terror”, “Magnificent”, “Inflexible”

Könnt ihr historische Skins als alternative Premium-Tarnungen anbieten, wie die schwarzen Tarnungen der Kaiserlichen Torpedoboote?

Wird es nach 2,5 Jahren endlich ein vernünftiges 3D Modell für Kaiser, König und Bayern geben? Vernünftig = glaubhaft (evtl in Richtung Yavuz von den Modernisierungen) (Vorschlag: macht doch einen Community-Wettbewerb wie bei den Tarnungen draus)

They should be added and will be eventually but hopefully as Battleships with regards to Matchmaking. There is no Battlecruiser type in WOWS so either the ships are BB or CAs - and these ships are better off as BBs. Line proposal: T3: Indefatigable T4: Lion T5: Tiger T6: Renown T7: Admiral T8: G3 (Incomparable) T9/10: Either one of the paper projects or just merge back at T8/9 to main line

Jupp: - WOWS-Yorck -> Entwurf I/10 (Panzerschiffe-Vorläufer-Studie) - WG hat hier einfach einen „klassischen“ (schweren) Kreuzernamen verwendet - Ersatz-Yorck -> verbesserter Mackensen-Schlachtkreuzer - HMS York (ohne C) -> abgesteckte County-Klasse der Royal Navy - SMS Yorck - Deutscher Panzerkreuzer, benannt nach Ludwig Yorck, versank 1914 in einem eigenen Minenfeld nach Navigationsfehler

You wrote: 213 responses 129 voted against, Mr Rabbit And 213 responses don’t give any meaningful picture and therefore your post is just another whine thread. Your reaction emphasizes that unfortunately. cheers

You do realize that 129 votes is nothing - and statistically completely irrelevant? If your intention really was to gather the playerbase’s opinion (which I would question given your comments on the other thread) you would have needed a much larger sample. Anyway - I can see why the rework creates such emotional reactions. But I don’t think this will change anything

Design "E" (Walther No.2b) Vote here !

Design "D" (Walther No.2a) Vote here !

Design "C" (Walther No.1) Vote here !

Design "B" (DeadMemories) Vote here !

Design "A" (Exzession) Vote here !

So liebe Freunde - ich denke, die Zeit ist reif für eine weitere Abstimmung! Heute steht zur Wahl: das Eskalations-Schlachtschiff für die Zeit, wenn alle Dämme brechen und die lieben Flottenverträge über Bord gekippt werden. Ins Rennen geschickt wurden die folgenden fünf Designs: Design "A" ( @eXzession ) - LINK: 54.300t STD / 269,9m x 38m x 12,8m / 16 x V12Z 42/58 Diesel / 33,1kn / 12.500sm bei 18kn / 3 x 3 42cm L/48 SK / 14 x 2 12.8cm L/45 DP / 12 x 4 4cm L/56 Bofors / 12 x 2 2cm L/65 Design "B" ( @DeadMemories ) - LINK: 51.200t STD / 278m x 37m x 11,4m / 16 x V12Z 42/58 Diesel / 31kn / 21.000sm bei 18kn / 3 x 3 42cm L/48 SK / 11 x 2 12.8cm L/45 DP / 20 x 2 4cm L/56 Bofors / 8 x 4 2cm L/65 Design "C" ( @Walther_K_Nehring ) - LINK: 47.300t STD / 259,55m x 36m x 10,2m / 12 x V12Z 42/58 Diesel / 31,1kn / 12.000sm bei 18kn / 4 x 2 40.6cm L/52 SK / 10 x 2 12.8cm L/45 DP / 20 x 2 4cm L/56 Bofors / 8 x 4 2cm L/65 / 2 x 4 53.3cm TW für G7 Typ Torpedos (z.B. G7d) Design "D" ( @Walther_K_Nehring ) - LINK: 48.400t STD / 259,55m x 36m x 10,2m / 16 x V12Z 42/58 Diesel / 33,3kn / 12.000sm bei 18kn / 4 x 2 40.6cm L/52 SK / 10 x 2 12.8cm L/45 DP / 20 x 2 4cm L/56 Bofors / 8 x 4 2cm L/65 / 2 x 4 53.3cm TW für G7 Typ Torpedos (z.B. G7d) Design "E" ( @Walther_K_Nehring ) - LINK: 49.300t STD / 259,55m x 36m x 10,2m / 16 x V12Z 42/58 Diesel / 33,2kn / 12.000sm bei 18kn / 4 x 2 40.6cm L/52 SK / 10 x 2 12.8cm L/45 DP / 20 x 2 4cm L/56 Bofors / 8 x 4 2cm L/65 / 2 x 4 53.3cm TW für G7 Typ Torpedos (z.B. G7d) - etwas stärkere Panzerung als Typ "D" -> 330mm statt 310mm Gürtel Bitte voted wie üblich auf die Posts unten - diese Abstimmung läuft bis Mittwoch 12.12.2018 / 18:00 CET Happy voting !