1MajorKoenig

Ignorieren eher nicht, da sie Feedback ja brauchen. Aber immer etwas damit machen sicher nicht. Manche Leute vergessen hier, dass wir über die Arbeit von einer ganzen Menge Leute sprechen, die Herzblut darein stecken und davon leben. Klar interessiert die, wie Dinge aufgenommen werden. Was natürlich nicht bedeutet, dass immer alle einer Meinung sind.

Of course mechanics are designed with something in mind. But balancing is done on actual results not on potential.

I am not sure if you are serious about this or if you just have an incredible boring sense of humour. The numbers are averages and averages tend to get higher throughout the tiers. You are comparing some T7 ships to T8 ships and say: „look how OP these T8 ships are compare to the T7 ships! They have higher average damage!” Comparing these adds absolutely NO value to the discussion whatsoever. It is just a waste of time and server space (and your life time for that matter but that is obviously your own business). I am not interested in your pointless and contentfree texts but I had to point out what a bull- nonsense you post here for the others just in case someone doesn’t notice himself So long

Mehr Flieger geht nur wieder in Richtung “Kamikaze-Meta” - das kann nicht die Lösung sein. Das Problem an den Bomben ist der Winkel. Vor dem Change konnte man damit ganz ok Zitadellen droppen aber WeeGee hat den Winkel deutlich flacher gemacht, dadurch geht das nicht mehr. Plus: der Nerf der Bombergenauigkeit, der für HE Bomber (vor allem wegen Midway vs DDs) kommen sollte, wurde klammheimlich auch auf die GZ AP Bomber angewandt. Eine weitere von vielen Lügen

I would be curious to see this statistics as I am not aware it is captured when damage is inflicted. That is simply not possible as you never know how the players will use or even misuse mechanics. Of course players comes into the mix. Or are you measuring performance without the players?

It isn’t dishonest - there is more useful and less useful damage. But it is dishonest to present screwed averages that tell absolutely Nothing to “prove” CVs are OP. Your wrong assumption btw is that you assume that all CVs play perfectly and always to the ship’s full potential. You should know better. Balancing is about averages not a few exceptions (if you really think all player always play brilliant - play a game right now. It’s weekend )

I did. But you are going off the wrong assumptions.

All of them

Dear Mr. @Sunleader! While you are fortunately on my igno list for a while so I won’t bother with your walls of content-free text I feel I need to call you out on this one. Either you don’t understand the numbers you are throwing around or you are straight up lying. I am not even sure what is worse. Higher tiers in maple Syrup is T7+. As you might know there are no T7+9 CVs so you are comparing T8 with T7+T8 and T10 with T9+10. Naturally these numbers are therefore inflated and have literally ZERO added value or information because of that. This comparison can’t be used for anything else then cleaning a dark place where the sun never shines. Plus: CV damage is for a significant part done after the game is already decided - unfortunately we don’t have the ratio available yet. And I hope I don’t need to explain that the XP figure is completely irrelevant as the modifiers are pulled out of blue air by WG. Same with lower tiers btw but the CV numbers there are already pitiful. SO: for the love of god, stop spreading your nonsense please. thx

Schön wär‘s wenn das eine Lösung wäre. Aber die AI verliert alle deine Flieger, ohne dass man das groß verhindern kann. Das hat nicht viel mit Hirn zu tun

Make the AA progression flatter / less steep would be an excellent start (but requires some effort - something WeeGee tries to avoid by seamingly simple but at the end disastrous quick shot solutions of which they have no clue what they will do )

Because in return the alpha gets reduced drastically. See - either you play “all or nothing” like in RTS - meaning you strike a target and nuke or mission kill it in case you get through. In that scenario no-fly-zones are needed as a counter. Or: you make aerial torpedos do a meager 2.5 k damage which is less than a BB normal pen and you acknowledge that striking needs to be possible with very few exception. WeeGee tried to go from 1) to 2) with the rework but start building in no-fly-zones now - based on feelings - mind you - as S_O even admitted (!) not actual needs. That is a problem

But these changes are outright stupid as they contradict the purpose of the rework. If you do something - do it. A man’s gotta do what a man’s gotta do. But don’t change your direction 360 degrees while doing so. Never ends well If they continue like that we end up in the exact same shitty little situation we were coming from

- no-fly-zones are not really compatible with the rework itself - I am not aware of any T7 CVs. Just for my understanding - do you mean these ships should be an auto win button against T6 or even against T8 CVs?

I know what it’s for but the fact it is almost mandatory shows that the whole thing is broken

The fact you have to bomb open water tells you how the current “balans” is WeeGee panic’d and screw over the system rather than adjust it. The changes of 0.8.5 were not needed and are completely against the concept of the rework. What a surprise the result is bull-

No you said Flak clouds can be dodged and therefor don’t count in the overall AA equation. And I am highly doubtful about that if you look at ALL players (not the top 100) and I am challenging this on the broader perspective.

Cheers mate just checked the clock.... kids

You state this as a given. I would be highly curious what the global ratio between Flak cloud damage to DPS is. I don’t think it is as insignificant as you assume. You are again trying to balance a class based on the best players - what is bull- and would take us to a very dark place we have been before.

What’s on the menu today?

So isses

Genau alle anderen Klassen sind einfacher und belohnender. Und die Hater fordern weitere CV Nerfs - befeuert von einigen wenigen, die CVs sehr gut spielen aber eigentlich ihrem WOW für Arme honterhertrauern und immer wieder zeigen „seht her, so OP ist das neue System, (gebt uns das alte zurück)“. Was hier passiert ist eine einzige Shitshow und ein Armutszeugnis für diese Community (von der ich vorher eigentlich einen verhältnismäßig guten Eindruck hatte).

Howdy, anyone else having a problem with the activity stream being empty? Anybody knows how to fix it? Cheers + Thanks

Was genau schlägt Frankreich vor?