1MajorKoenig

I meant DD spotting would also be just visible on the minimap? Either way - all pros and cons have been exchanged. I don’t like the idea at all and I am aware there are much better option. However we both know WG will do their thing anyway - no matter how often we go through this

And I am sure you demand the same spiffing idea for DDs as well?

I absolutely LOVE Gascogne. In my opinion she is what Battlecruisers should have been in this game. I find her guns to do extremely well uptiers (well without overmatch but that’s really it). Aren’t JB’s guns the same btw...?

Fiji won’t go to kill it as it can’t see it

See that is a different discussion. I never understood why we need rocket fighters to begin with. Many players - mostly “pro-Cv” if you want to call gem that - proposed to replace RFs by the missing DB type and you can obviously scale AP citadel damage up and down until it is somewhat balanced (between effort to drop, having a counter to island huggers and the prize you pay in casualties). All of that would be a reasonable discussion to have and worth testing. But just adding and adding AA keeps the original problems but makes it a very unfun experience at the same time

Not sure if you misunderstand intentionally. Elazer was always very open about his motivation. Nothing wrong about that. But he certainly doesn’t want to fix the rework. We wants to break it - ask him if you don’t believe it. Of course I want a balanced game - I play and want to play all classes. Three are fine (well more or less) and one loses your planes automatically so you just kamikaze in over and over again. Tell me Mr. I want good for all mankind: how is that fun for a CV? And are you even remotely scared when a CV attacks you? Or are you laughing hard?

Delay would be fine, minimap spotting just removes another gameplay element and reduces the CV’s role further into the damage dealer niche. Better in my opinion is the “transmit Recon” function so you can give spotting for the team from time to time but more controlled

Kein Problem - ist auf dem Weg

That would be the worst possible solution

Er parkt irgendwo, wo er nicht gebraucht wird Solange Flak durch Insel schießt und meie AA keine LoS zum Ziel braucht bringt mir als Flieger auch das Verstecken nichts. Die genannten beiden Punkte zu fixen würde schonmal etwas bringen

Doch das stimmt sehr wohl. Einzige Alternative: wegbleiben (was du ja in epischer Breite ausgewalzt hast). Sich diese verkorkste einseitige AA “Balans” noch schönreden zu wollen, zeigt ein ungesundes Maß an Desinteresse an der gesamten Balance

Gascogne uptiers quite well. The guns are amazing - pen and accuracy - and she is extremely mobile. An amazing ship really

Convince about what? All you have been doing since the rework is bad mouthing the rework with varying degrees of honesty. Your sole driver is to damage the rework in the hope to get your broken and inherently unattractive detached RTS mini game back. And while you keep repeating that rework player numbers keep dropping after 6 month of constant nerf-drumfire, you are missing the essential point: that pre-rework there were these few players because of a lack of attractiveness not because of a lack of impact and fun. Therefore no: WG shouldn’t be listening to your suggestions indeed. Not because of knowledge but because of the intentions. You don’t want a balanced healthy game. You want an as much as possible broken game. See above. Plus: the rework could indeed easily be improved to a degree where one could call it satisfactory. However you - along with the rest of the CV hater group for which you seem to become some kind of mascot - are throwing enough smoke to make any meaningful discussion on improvements more difficult. Unfortunately WG sometimes even listens at the bull- - that’s when it becomes a prob. On the other hand all discussions here are largely irrelevant to WG anyway as the only feedback they take is from their home market. Which is the least enthusiastic about CVs in general and pretty BB-heavy. Guess why the CV curve goes where it goes...? I am slowly getting tired of this discussion so: @Ev1n / @MrConway / @Crysantos / @Sub_Octavian : Playing CVs after 0.8.5 is unfun and pretty pointless. It’s reduced to a kamikaze mini game. You didn’t give a statement here but here is the my request again: Please offer full refund for all CVs and give anyone the choice - either continue this bumpy balancing ride or call it a day and leave That is something you should offer Thx for an official statement EDIT: slightly altered the wording

That one on the BBs was hilarious. I don’t remember any better one-liner from WeeGee.

Not „take over“ but „don’t worry“? Hell yes. Or Gascogne. Or Kii. It’s no issue whatsoever to play T10 in these. Because - simply - you are not locked out of the battle

Dann werden wieder drei Optionen, deren Grundzüge ja bereits veröffentlicht wurden, zur Mehrheitsentscheidung gestellt. Aber natürlich wäre eine Einigung im Plenum vorzuziehen falls das möglich ist uns sich die Delegationen entsprechend aufeinander zubewegen. Ich lausche da einfach mal interessiert

Nun, das kommt dem französischen Kompromiss schon sehr nah @quash Das wäre also: - Bestandsschutz - Allgemeines Limit deutlich unter 1.000 ts - Ersatzbauten ausschließlich im Limit Können sich die anderen Delegationen mit diesem US-Französischen Kompromiss anfreunden?

Not a gigantic surprise. WG fudged around with the fundamentals of the rework and the result is a shitty little kamikaze game. It’s unfun and stupid so the decline in players isn‘t surprising. I played one game yesterday - was crap. Forced myself to do a second. Was even worse. Switched off the game afterwards.

This one made my day

Your world is simple. “I don’t have to worry and my AA shoots everything done while I am on the phone so that must be balans!” What a bull- sorry. Plane losse are beyond stupidly excessive. If you are seriously calling that balans you can’t be interested in anything even close to it.

She is - just on display right now

OoR: alle wichtigen Typen liegen bei 500-650 ts

Und es ist auch nicht schwierig 6 zusätzliche Rohre einzubauen und die beim Bau vorzusehen