1MajorKoenig

Yes of course

...and 1 vs 1 is also largely irrelevant in a team game. Especially one with a distinct class system. An Asashio will always win against a Kremlin 1 vs 1 but that doesn’t mean she is a stronger ship. Your only point is your personal preference - or better dislike for a class which is better at scouting than your precious favourite class.

Your statement: CV = autowin Pull any number you like - it won’t show a win rate of 100% In fact numbers for CV indicate that CVs are relatively balanced. Your personal disapproval of the class is not relevant for balancing really.

Auf Reddit hat S_O wohl kundgetan, dass Siegfried nicht mehr lange “shelved” bleiben soll. Man darf gespannt sein

This statement either shows a stunning lack of capabilities to read numbers or is completely dishonest. Why am I not surprised

OMG - yea of course and you can get detonated unluckily. However if you don’t play your DD like a *** you won’t get torped or at least almost never. Rocket fighters I never liked to be honest and I agree that this shotgun style attack pattern is a terrible idea.

And there MUSTN’D be one! Why keep people demanding “Autowin” Balance? Do you get killed in one attack by a CV?! NO!

Interessanter ist der Airdrag. Das ist ja seit jeher eine Spielwiese für Russia-stronk-Softstatbalancing.

Err nope. There are certainly issues with most classes in the game but the stuff you describe - nope. However - apart from all the mimimi - T4 CVs are indeed out of place. Best solution would be to bump them up to T5 as they are

Ist ja kein Problem. Gut, wenn an der letzten Iteration ausgiebig gewerkelt wird. Das „nicht-auftauchen-können“ ist hoffentlich bald Geschichte. Ich meine Wabos sind ja endlich manuell - das ist doch schon am was! Jetzt bitte noch: Möglichkeit zum Auftauchen, Deckgun-Secondaries, glaubwürdige Geschwindigkeiten pro Tauchtiefe und weg mit den Pings und Lenktorpedos!

Wir sind gespannt

Ist ja eher eine Störmchen

Sowas finden die meisten eklig

Weißt du schon wann?

Ja genau.

What is this screenshot supposed to tell me? CVs have comparable damage to Cruisers at T10? Ian that what you wanted to show? Where are the BBs??? oh boy... And no. Not the “whole community” is complaining. Only some very few and very vocal dudes here. And if you take Jingles as your reference .... oh boy

A lot of people were salty that Ashitaka and Mutsu were A-Hulls in their prior life. I for one love Dreadnoughts and don’t mind weak AA. Both are more or less glass cannons and indeed a little special. Certainly not the all-around-comfy boats but great fun if you get used to them. Kii is basically an Amagi which just looks better

No? I love then all three tbh Ashitaka is one of my overall favourites

Würde ich 1:1 unterschreiben und Aigle dazupacken. Die Moonraker-Shells sind zwar nervig aber trotzdem macht sie Spaß

We have been talking about 0.8.5 - now these ships are fine (apart from GZ’s DBs which still suck)

Ah look who’s back :-) Said balanced was absolutely garbage and unbalanced. Some CVs were still strong (Enterprise) and some were close to useless such as Kaga and GZ. Furthermore CVs were strong as top tier and almost useless when lowtier. Calling this state “balanced” is either a lie on purpose or a highly strange perception of the word “balance”. Have a read of the statistics at your leisure. Numbers are better than your questionable claims

Ein Mann muss tun, was ein Mann tun muss - alles Gute Aber ich werde dich weiter anmorsen - ab und zu schaut er doch bestimmt mal rein :-) Bisschen OT: hatte zwar auch gerade ein paar Monate Pause aber die letzten Tage habe ich mal wieder gezockt - und hatte eigentlich recht viel Spaß. Vielleicht war die Pause genau das was ich brauchte

Well „no-fly-zones“ are completely contradictory to the rework itself and pretty stupid by themselves. Be 100% immune to some players „just because“?! That was bad design to begin with - partially offset by gigantic alpha strikes so it came down to „all or nothing“. Which led to the class acceptance and skill difference impact WG wanted to get rid of. Where I agree is btw that some AP bomber wings are too consistent to fit into the „a strike gets through“ meta. Especially Enterprise‘s - these are stupid

@Parasitkaffee - gute Frage aber Walther’s Antwort interpretiere ich als “mehr wie Scharnhorst” EDIT: zum Thema „geneigt oder nicht“

Crap to play is certainly subjective. Numbers can be compared Playing against - well don’t have a problem with that either but I understand the criticism. Also - T4 CVs should be bumped up to T4 as they are