1MajorKoenig

Valider Einwand und ein wirklich guter Kompromiss in meinen Augen. Ich kann gern etwas vorbereiten - allerdings nur “frei Hand” basierend auf Take’s Konstruktion. Aber: was brauchst du genau? Eine Draufsicht? Irgendwelche Detailansichten? Ansicht von vorn?

Hamburg als T9 oder 10 gern mit 4 autogeladenen 10cm Rohren

wenn diese alten Eimer noch kommen gibt‘s ne halbe Flasche Bier für jeden von der Mannschaft!

Ich denke das ist keiner der WW1 Träger (Ausonia, etc.) sondern eine WW2 Studie? Aber richtige Doppeldecker (also nicht diese Fi 167 Ratten) hätte ich aber schon gern! Am besten Fokker D XIII (notfalls auch D XVII). Aber wie ich WG kenne wird es eher in Richtung Arado 65 und He 50 gehen. PS: ich liiiiiiiieeeeeeebe faqn Wackeltopfs!!!!

Thx — Understood about the stats — but can you already share any info on the aircrafts on these ships? Like this...?

A–L–L–E–R–D–I–N–G–S !!! Hoffe außerdem, dass sie den Namen auf „Richthofen“ kürzen — alternativ „Le Diable Rouge“ Btw. sind das etwa wieder Focke Wulf TAs..? Come on WG – Traut euch und rückt die Me 262 raus! Ihr wollt es doch auch

Are you seriously implying that only the German Tree gets a Fantasy Fleet? Heck this game lost contact with realism with the second tree introduced after launch, some semi credible Russian super DDs. Even if there are real ships - WeeeGeee goes for Fantasy these days. Look at French BBs Mondieu! T6/7 are pure BS even if Strasbourg would have been a real ship contender for these spots. It’s not about “Wehraboo” - dreams. All Navies get this questionable treatment of WG Fantasy. I would’ve preferred a more realistic direction for the game but hey - the majority seems to be demanding these things. Hence why we will see Z-Plan ships galore (= excellent business) and full Fantasy stuff like GK, Republique and the likes. With the former out of the way I fully agree on that one. I would like to see one or even two more IJN CV lines but it is rather obvious why the next line isn’t another IJN line: 1) trouble to differentiate within a “Nation’s flavour” unless going full steam gimmicky or for new concept such as these dubious Support CVs (not gonna happen right now) and 2) German CVs will be good business as the German market is relatively large and well paying by WG’s own statements

I like CVs yes. But I don’t like the current rocket fighters as they are too much of a shotgun and honestly I would have just removed them and have only AP+ HE DBs and TBs instead. But as you know WG won’t tailor the game just for some personal preference such as mine. I am not sure if these CVs will be UP. I mean — weak vs DDs wouldn’t be a terrible thing as you can still teamwork against these little buggers through spotting which should be it really. Whether these CVs are strong or not will probably depend on their AP DBs. GZ‘s are useless — but from the text the line CVs‘ DBs are different. TBs will probably be low DMG like all German Torps in the game. As for the AP rocket fighters — I don’t agree that angling against these will be useless knowing how nicely experienced DesMoines can manoeuvre under attack. And going by GZ planes‘ squishiness a second attack run is rather unlikely unless endgame against isolated targets. But let’s see how they play out — but I sincerely hope these AP fighters won’t be OP. That would be the last thing we need

Richtig, der Name ist Richthofen. Traditionell wurde das „von“ meist weggelassen (Fürst Bismarck, Mackensen, Derfflinger, Roon, etc.). Viel komischer ist die Einbindung des Vornamens. Nur „Richthofen“ wäre am passendsten aus meiner Sicht. Btw. Das „von“ wegzulassen wird übrigens nur dann als unhöflich empfunden, wenn es von nicht–Adligen so verwendet wird.

Good news! Maybe even a good reason to get into the game again

Just like Prinz Eitel Friedrich. Started great and ended up as a stinker. Even more disappointing as the ship is a Mackensen class - one of the most beautiful ship classes. But yea - not interested in Mainz or Odin. Will watch out what happens to Siegfried - but yea.... Excitement- it’s not

Well yea ok. Learning the game would be desirable to make the experience better for everyone. However that is something different than “balancing by absolute potential”.

Which is to a degree true for all classes and a very strange definition of balancing by numbers. I still find this “muh all the players are sooo incompetent and I am the only smart chicken here” extremely annoying and in fact quite out of place for such a product. We are not talking about the premier league but about a simplistic and very slow HP bag shooter for old farts. Maybe your expectations are slightly inflated

While I didn’t check the numbers - don’t you think it is much more related to the lower player count on CVs...?

1. Applies to any Class and ship in the game 2. You still don’t seem to understand that WG Doesn’t only look at overall averages but builds multiple averages across groups to understand performance among weak/average/good players. Fortunately WG isn’t as stupid as to balance only on absolute potential of any given ship/class like some here suggested but is in fact much much better than that. But this has been explained a million time and discussed to death. So.. I leave it at that even if it seems particularly difficult for whatever reasons. 3. Average player = abysmal is based on what facts? What should the average player be in your opinion? Should everyone have a 65% Winrate and 200k Dmg average? Ah wait - probably not gonna work like that?

Das kannst du noch hundertmal wiederholen - aber das Schiff ist nun mal nicht so geplant worden. Das wäre ungefähr so als ob du sagen würdest die Scheer MUSS aber einen Scharnhorst-Turm haben weil das ja die Scharnhorst auch hatte. Hatte sie aber nicht. Und hat auch keinen bekommen. Oder die Königsberg. Oder die Nürnberg. Oder die anderen Panzerschiffe. Aber wie gesagt - es wird mir echt zu blöd mit deinem Scharnhorst-Wahn.

Nö das hat nix mit den 1920ern zu tun aber ich habe auch absolut keine Lust mehr das immer wieder zu wiederholen. So langsam nervt es einfach unfassbar. Die Falkenhayn ist ganz bewusst im Stile der frühen 1930ern gestaltet. Mit dem schmalen runden Röhrenmast den niedrigen / schmalen Aufbauten. Auf dem Bild sehe ich einen weiteren Scharnhorst Abklatsch. Kann er ja gern machen aber dann hat es halt mit der Falkenhayn nix mehr zu tun.

Nicht falsch verstehen – du machst da sehr coole Sachen. Bloß sieht das Schiff mit diesen Aufbauten in meinen Augen nun aus wie eine weitere Scharnhorst–Kopie – halt nur mit zwei Schornsteinen und vier Türmen. Der „eigene“ Charakter des Schiffs ist dabei leider verloren gegangen für mich. Und es hat mit der Falkenhayn für mich leider auch nicht mehr viel zu tun.

42cm Monster–Siegfried...?

Kognak ist nicht tageszeitgebunden :–)

Good bye Blixies!

Out of curiosity: is this to test changes to these two lines or are these actual ships intended for players later on?

Intern WG oder ist der Test Server zurück?

In wie fern? Hat die Scheer doch auch? Die ist auch “3D” :-)

Not saying she‘s inaccurate and hit rate percentage is decent but the difference to Kongo, König and PVelyky isn’t huge (and these are a tier lower). König has two more shells in the air and while her percentage may be lower the actual hits per salvo are similar somewhat. I don’t like PEF’s game design but any experienced player obviously will make her work at these lower tiers. And that is the problem. She is mostly played by - at least somewhat experienced - players (not really a noob magnet). But she doesn’t allow the player to pull off amazing stunts either. She is lacking firepower for that - something Gascogne or Dunkerque have. PEF relies on supporting and dealing damage over the course of the game - something you don’t really fancy considering your comments in the CV section The most spectecular you will see about PEF is blapping T5+6 cruisers. Woooooowww...